User Controls
Pedo appreciation thread
-
2019-05-14 at 2:48 PM UTCI'd smoke a blunt with an hebephile
-
2019-05-14 at 2:50 PM UTCIf you are attracted to girls under the age of consent, you deserve to have your nuts cut off with hedge trimmers.
-
2019-05-14 at 2:56 PM UTCThey keep raising the age lol how is that my fault.
-
2019-05-14 at 2:56 PM UTClike 6 months ago SWIM fucked a teenager in the ass for her first time but she was 19 and didn't have a good support system so it's cool
-
2019-05-14 at 3 PM UTCHedge trimmers.
-
2019-05-14 at 3:47 PM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 1:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Ghost I'd smoke a blunt with an hebephile
hebephiles prove my point completely. because with 13 to 15 year old girls there is really very little difference physically to 16 and 17 year olds. so if you are specifically targeting girls between 13 and 15 then the attraction cannot be physical. if it was the physical look that you was attracted to then why not just go for 16 and 17 year olds and save yourself a whole shitload of problems, like your whole life being completely destroyed by the state for ever. that means guys who specifically target 13 to 15 year olds are doing so for the risk and the added excitement they get from that risk.
. -
2019-05-17 at 2:18 AM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 2:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc hebephiles prove my point completely. because with 13 to 15 year old girls there is really very little difference physically to 16 and 17 year olds. so if you are specifically targeting girls between 13 and 15 then the attraction cannot be physical. if it was the physical look that you was attracted to then why not just go for 16 and 17 year olds and save yourself a whole shitload of problems, like your whole life being completely destroyed by the state for ever. that means guys who specifically target 13 to 15 year olds are doing so for the risk and the added excitement they get from that risk.
.
if they're more or less the same then theres really no rational reason to prefer one ober another other than be cucked by some arbitrary, man-made stupid laws. -
2019-05-17 at 2:26 AM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 2:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL If you can force sex onto a young child, or even find a young child sexually attractive, there's already no hope for you. Your heart is already rotten. You can't make a good heart out of a rotten heart, no matter how hard you try; ain't never gonna happen. The only real solution is the death penalty. Most preferably with lots of torture just before.
but ... but what if it was the childrens that started it ?
like ... so one day your just going about your day minding your own business and then they came and say hi to you in the playground and asked if you'd like to be their friend amd watch them dance ? -
2019-05-17 at 2:56 AM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 3:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc The point I was getting at last night was that we as humans view sex as being something you do behind closed doors, hiding it away, a little bit naughty. And that then in our minds creates an added layer of excitement. The whole dodging around and risk of getting found out is what makes a new relationship interesting, we get a buzz from it all.
Thats all instilled into our minds as kids when were taught to hide our nudity and scorned for letting it slip. Made to feel embarrassed bout our bodies. And then as teenagers its revealed to us about this whole sex thing that adults have been doing their utmost to hide from us at all costs for our entire childhood.
Then we start our sex lives usually keeping it pretty vanilla at first as we discover what its all about. This new exciting adult only world. But once thats gone on for so long it tends to lose its excitement a bit and gets boring and repetitive. So we look for ways to spice things up. We do that by adding more and more elements of risk, Making it more naughty.
The risk can come in the form of risk of being caught and/or humiliated. Think of people who have sex in public places, indulge in weird fetishes like tickling or adult baby shit. Or serial adulterers also fall into this catagory.
Then there is risk of physical harm. Bondage for example, autoerotic asphyxiation being an extreme. Adultery could also cross over here if there is a violent spouse involved. It also explains why many women go with the bad boys and will often keep returning to men who are violent towards them.
Then there is the risk of prosecution by the state which could involve any of the illegal activities in whichever location they happen to be in. Serial rapists like Bill Krozby and of course pedophillia being the most obvious and widespread now.
See as humans the risk/reward system in our brains gives us a hit of dopamine when we take a risk and pull it off. When that hit is combined with orgasm you get a real kickass high. People even get addicted to this and start seeking more and more extreme ways to get the same hit. Just like you see with drugs, gambling and other addictions.
Most people who do this don't even realize the reason they do it and will focus their attention more on the object of affection. Pedophiles are no different, despite many will deny it, this is what leads them into this extreme fetish. The ultimate risk makes it very exhillerating for them. If it was to go wrong they know full well that along with prosecution and jail time they'll also face public humiliation, scrutiny and hatred. Loss of employment, wealth and even physical attacks. So when they get away with it the buzz is equally extreme. This is why a death penalty rather than prevent the behavior will just feed it as it will serve to make it even more of a riskier practice which will then increase the reward when the risk is pulled off successfully.
Never used to be like that as society in previous centuries didn't view it with such disdain. In the late Victorian age the first age of consent law was passed in the UK making it an offence to have sexual relations with a girl below the age of 13. The reason for this law tho was only because it was being noted that young girls were being manipulated into prostitution by unscrupulous pimps and being badly taken advantage of as they were too young to stand up for themselves. After consideration lawmakers decided the best way to combat this was to ban all sexual relations with young girls as prostitution was already illegal. So making soliciting with a younger girl illegal wasn't going to make any difference.
Unfortunately all this law achieved over the continuing decades was to make the idea of sex with a very young child seem more appealing to many as its prohibition now made it a very risky venture. And only served to turn many on to the idea. As the age of consents were heightened and also applied to boys it just made more and more children become the target of thrill seeking horny men. Classic example of the Streisand effect where in trying to protect something they just made it into an even bigger target than it ever was to begin with.
Unfortunately now its likely too late to do anything about it. What can you do? Continue on the same path and we continue to make children the target of thrill seekers looking for an edgier high. Yet we drop the age of consent laws and those that have already crossed that line will continue having a field day. Maybe after a while that thrill will wear off and they go in search of more exciting ways to get off. Their mothers or a chicken maybe.
I think realisticly a world where zero children are sexually abused is never going to happen. But the current situation is clearly making it much more worse than it would have been. Especially nowadays where media hype and scaremongering make it seem an even riskier endeavor. Of course that suits the authorities because the more parents feel endangered through their children, the more they turn to the government for protection. And are more and more prepared to give up more in order to retain what is little more than the illusion of security anyway. But thats win/win for the authorities who don't actually give a fuck really if something bad happens to any of us. Certainly not if its lining their pockets and handing them more power and control in the process.
.
you only say this because the only reason you enjoy drugs is because they're illegal. -
2019-05-17 at 3:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny but … but what if it was the childrens that started it ?
like … so one day your just going about your day minding your own business and then they came and say hi to you in the playground and asked if you'd like to be their friend amd watch them dance ?
but that makes you a grown man who hangs out in kids playgrounds. only one reason why you're there, anybody can figure that out.
. -
2019-05-17 at 3:14 AM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 3:41 AM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 3:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc but that makes you a grown man who hangs out in kids playgrounds. only one reason why you're there, anybody can figure that out.
.
theres no law against hanging out @ childrens playground as an adult. in fact childrens are supposed to play at playgrounds under direct adult supervision. -
2019-05-17 at 3:56 AM UTCBurn pedophiles.
-
2019-05-17 at 8:51 AM UTC
-
2019-05-17 at 8:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny theres no law against hanging out @ childrens playground as an adult. in fact childrens are supposed to play at playgrounds under direct adult supervision.
you know i can't believe when i saw the good answer you gave in the other fred just now, that i actually entertained the idea that maybe banny was going to actually stop saying really dumb smartass comments like this all the time. da fuk was i thinking?
.
