User Controls

ATTN: Lanny

  1. #1
    http://niggasin.space/thread/5757?p=4 Give these 2 like a three day cool down ban. PLEASE

    Sincerely,
    Everyone else.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. #2
    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Calm down reject.
  3. #3


    The fuck....
  4. #4
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Meet me in Meadowhall Centre, i'll do ur nan in bruv.
  5. #5
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The spambots should have been deleted outright and their IP subset perma-banned. You see, Lanny is TOO liberal. That's his problem, and apparently ours as well. Some day, I'm going to sit that kid down and learn him the finer points of BBS ettiquite.
  6. #6
    Ajax African Astronaut [rumor the placative aphakia]
    Nobody can be banned from space.
  7. #7
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Ajax Nobody can be banned from space.

    Actually, that's not true. "The Outer Space Treaty", formally the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", bans harvesters from doing their thing in space. Yes, the Thought Police, or in this case, the Mineral Police, have already been there, too.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. #8
    Ajax African Astronaut [rumor the placative aphakia]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Actually, that's not true. "The Outer Space Treaty", formally the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", bans harvesters from doing their thing in space. Yes, the Thought Police, or in this case, the Mineral Police, have already been there, too.

    What happens to countries who are not parties to the treaty?

  9. #9
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The spambots should have been deleted outright and their IP subset perma-banned. You see, Lanny is TOO liberal. That's his problem, and apparently ours as well. Some day, I'm going to sit that kid down and learn him the finer points of BBS ettiquite.

    Blanket banning an IP subset/range is TOO harsh.
  10. #10
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Sophie Blanket banning an IP subset/range is TOO harsh.

    If, by some rare happenstance, someone is unrighteously banned, they can simply e-mail and have their IP subset cleared from the ban. It's not harsh. Spabots should be banned on sight, and they shouldn't have their shitdroppings sitting around for days, weeks and months stinking up the boards either.

    p.s You toddler molester.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. #11
    What if they're not spambots they're real people just trying to make a living and Lanny is banning them from earning a legitimate income
  12. #12
    By the power of -SpectraL! Vi veri universum vivus vici!
  13. #13
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The spambots should have been deleted outright and their IP subset perma-banned. You see, Lanny is TOO liberal. That's his problem, and apparently ours as well. Some day, I'm going to sit that kid down and learn him the finer points of BBS ettiquite.

    You are against freedom
  14. #14
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Freedom Fuckers Inc.
  15. #15
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump You are against freedom

    Spam isn't speech. Kidiot scribblings aren't speech. Speech is speech.
  16. #16
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by -SpectraL If, by some rare happenstance, someone is unrighteously banned, they can simply e-mail and have their IP subset cleared from the ban. It's not harsh. Spabots should be banned on sight, and they shouldn't have their shitdroppings sitting around for days, weeks and months stinking up the boards either.

    p.s You toddler molester.

    I agree that spambots should be banned on sight but blanket banning IP subsets/ranges is like taking a ten pound hammer to a 1 inch nail. It's a bit overkill.
  17. #17
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by reject What if they're not spambots they're real people just trying to make a living and Lanny is banning them from earning a legitimate income

    Then they should go into business with google, spambots are a blackhat advertising strategy.
  18. #18
    Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Spam isn't speech. Kidiot scribblings aren't speech. Speech is speech.

    Fuck you spectral, you've had this stupid double standard on what people are allowed to say or do for as long as I've know you. Freedom at all costs until someone does something you don't like, then it's 10 miles of bullshit about kidiot "spammers" (replace "kidiot" with "person who hurt my feelings" in every spectral post and it starts to make a lot more sense). If anyone ever gave you any actual power you'd be a tyrant, historically when people have made that mistake that's exactly what you've been.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. #19
    Yea guys, let's argue over -SpectraL's moderater activities from 20 years ago. I'll get my dragon dildo and we can start.
  20. #20
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by RisiR Yea guys, let's argue over -SpectraL's moderater activities from 20 years ago. I'll get my dragon dildo and we can start.

    My hate for Spectral runs deep like a ravine filled with BLOOD >:(
Jump to Top