User Controls
Cancer Free Cigarettes
-
2016-11-26 at 11:06 AM UTC
The idea is to use a enhancement with Palladium Nitrate that can be
activated by heat to trap 99.9% of emissions exactly the same way a catalytic converter works.
these are the most popular cancer causing chemicals in cigarette smoke. Tests can be done that prove these are enhancemented by the palladium.
Acrolein
Formaldehyde
Acrylonitrile
1,3-butadiene
Acetaldehyde
Ethylene oxide
IsopreneMold and other scientists in the tobacco industry were trying to
discourage this cancer triggering outcome by the addition of a catalyst (a substance that speeds up molecular reactions) to cigarettes
in order to achieve a move complete burn, cutting down on proliferation of free radicals,
just as catalytic converters were coming into use in automobiles to reduce pollutants emitted during incomplete gasoline combustion.
Over the years, Mold's department tested some 200 catalytic substances before hitting on the heavy metal Palladium, Added to tobacco
in microscopic amounts, palladium was found to reduce the crop of tumors on mouse back by 40 percent.
NO cancer causing smoke vs an extremely toxic enhancement. -
2016-11-26 at 11:06 AM UTCAlso you can turn regular cigarette butts into biofuel.
-
2016-11-26 at 7:13 PM UTCWhy not just use whole tobacco alkaloid e-juice?
-
2016-11-26 at 10:41 PM UTCnoob i smoke baccy nt fukin cIGS
-
2016-11-27 at 12:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by bling bling noob i smoke baccy nt fukin cIGS
The enhancements could be used on a rollie too and discarded like a battery or thermometer.
-
2016-11-27 at 1:02 AM UTCin a grav bong
-
2020-10-20 at 1:14 AM UTCThis is a good idea
-
2020-10-20 at 1:25 AM UTCI gotta stop smoking.
-
2020-10-20 at 1:26 AM UTCy not just walk around with a catalytic converter in ur posession at all times
-
2020-10-20 at 1:31 AM UTC
-
2020-10-20 at 2:17 AM UTC
-
2020-10-20 at 2:50 AM UTC
-
2020-10-20 at 3:56 AM UTCSorry, 99.99% reduced negative health benefits. the .01% is the palladium particles you inhale
-
2020-10-20 at 4:59 AM UTCill buy one for my onkle
-
2020-10-20 at 2:31 PM UTCdude people are overanalyzing the carcinogenic effects of cigarettes. you only live once, if you enjoy smoking, just dont do it in excess and limit yourself. for christsake. its not like some radiogenic isotope. its fucking tobacco.
-
2020-10-20 at 6:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by Dissociator dude people are overanalyzing the carcinogenic effects of cigarettes. you only live once, if you enjoy smoking, just dont do it in excess and limit yourself. for christsake. its not like some radiogenic isotope. its fucking tobacco.
Yeah, you only live once.
Some people just want to only live once to 80 instead of only living once to 45.
Want nicotine? Technology is great. Get a real device that will deliver it at 50mg/ml for less than 30 dollars a month, and no risk of cancer. Fuck your pussy ass MAOI's. You want to feel marginally better? Get some real drugs and stop smoking literal death sticks. They smell disgusting -
2021-11-21 at 5:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Yeah, you only live once.
Some people just want to only live once to 80 instead of only living once to 45.
Want nicotine? Technology is great. Get a real device that will deliver it at 50mg/ml for less than 30 dollars a month, and no risk of cancer. Fuck your pussy ass MAOI's. You want to feel marginally better? Get some real drugs and stop smoking literal death sticks. They smell disgusting
wow MMR , you told him! -
2021-12-29 at 2:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Dissociator dude people are overanalyzing the carcinogenic effects of cigarettes. you only live once, if you enjoy smoking, just dont do it in excess and limit yourself. for christsake. its not like some radiogenic isotope. its fucking tobacco.
I don't know about you but I feel pretty shitty when I smoke alot of cigarettes in a day. -
2021-12-29 at 3:05 PM UTCCandy cigarettes don’t cause cancer, or you could just eat the regular ones.