User Controls
Little girls are tight.
-
2019-03-10 at 2:59 PM UTC
-
2019-03-10 at 3:01 PM UTC
-
2019-03-10 at 3:03 PM UTC
-
2019-03-10 at 3:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist You know exactly what I mean. Just your way of denying the damage a person like you can do to a child.
I'm not denying anything.
Originally posted by WellHung Is being good is objective then what is the formula or equation to achieve it?
How should i know? All i know is that moral relativism is cancer. -
2019-03-10 at 3:05 PM UTCLA ROMA VICTORRRRRR!!!😁
-
2019-03-10 at 3:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Well I’m sorry that’s your struggle, it’s not mine.
Why breed? No one misses out on existence if they never were, and life is guaranteed suffering for no reason[other than selfish ones].
80ish years on a treadmill then you die.
I'm interested in what you have to say, don't just brush this off with "welp we disagree" you must have reasons? for rolling the dice with a persons life on the line.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-03-10 at 3:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung LA ROMA VICTORRRRRR!!!😁
Declare yourself victorious all you want. If being a good person is subjective you can't possibly punish anyone because all viewpoints would be valid. Ergo, i should just go out set buildings on fire, murder people, and rape children if that is my conception of what is good. -
2019-03-10 at 3:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Declare yourself victorious all you want. If being a good person is subjective you can't possibly punish anyone because all viewpoints would be valid. Ergo, i should just go out set buildings on fire, murder people, and rape children if that is my conception of what is good.
Not in a Democratic Society... the majority opinion usually ends up being the law... in theory everyone's viewpoint is equally valid.... but you can't effectively run a society that way... Pragmatically, societies have to make it objective, in the form of laws... or there would be Anarchy and chaos. -
2019-03-10 at 3:19 PM UTCSherri, get off Mats profile
-
2019-03-10 at 3:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by Krow I don't often say this but yes. I really was. the beatings were brutal. and people didn't want to get involved in domestic upbringing". "Spare the rod" but yeah.. it was huge sticks, cane, not the leather strap of a belt, but the leather strap of the belt with the metal buckle. getting punched in the nose by a full grown man, breaking it and blood splattering on the wall like a fucking mob hit just occurred.
Moms not calling 9-1-1. it's how it was dealt with. kicked into a closet or having your head slammed into a wall. sometimes in the garage with a nailhead sticking out. a closet with a sliding door.. no locks. "You pretend this is locked.. you come out you get to guess what will happen. then he leaves.
yea, using other commonly vilified minority groups as a surrogate for your abusive father and venting your angers on them isnt going to take away the pain you suffered as a child or are suffering now.
its ok now, your safe with us now. he cant hurt you anymore. -
2019-03-10 at 3:22 PM UTC
-
2019-03-10 at 3:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung Not in a Democratic Society… the majority opinion usually ends up being the law…
Cool, mob rule that seems fair. Aren't you an American, do i have to instruct on your own history? Remember you live in a constitutional republic for a reason.
Originally posted by WellHung in theory everyone's viewpoint is equally valid….
No it's not. Murder is never right, neither is child abuse.
Originally posted by WellHung but you can't effectively run a society that way… Pragmatically, societies have to make it objective, in the form of laws…
So you are saying a law is equivalent to a moral good. I don't think so.
Originally posted by WellHung or there would be Anarchy and chaos.
You haven't the slightest conception of what anarchy means. -
2019-03-10 at 3:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks Totse2k1/SpaceCakes/Krow is actually one of the more reasonable "anti-pedo" folks from what I can tell.
I've seen people advocate for much, much worse treatment.
He doesn't strike me as particularly sadistic and revenge driven compared to many out there.
hes just projecting and surrogating. -
2019-03-10 at 3:24 PM UTCI'm right and you're wrong, Sophie. You'll be best served to simply accept that and move on... there's no beating me...ever.👍
-
2019-03-10 at 3:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Sorry, but not sorry. The people in here that accept pedophiles and their proclivities, DO NOT HAVE CHILDREN. If ya had a child or children you would know the sickened feeling deep down in your gut, at the thought of someone sexually assaulting your child. Thank God it never happened to my son, but I started discussing what is “not ok” with him at a very early age. He’s told me he was never approached in such a manner. Thank God, I don’t want to go to jail for murder.
If my child came to me and said he had pedophilic tendencies, you can bank I’d get him continued psychiatric help. Accepting this as normal, is not normal.
So I don’t care if ya’ll wanna be pedo sympathizers. It sickens me, and if ya had a child it would sicken you too.
if your son confessed to you that he have had sex with a child will yiu take this 12gauge, stick it up his ass and pull the trigger ?
will you ? -
2019-03-10 at 3:26 PM UTC
-
2019-03-10 at 3:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Cool, mob rule that seems fair. Aren't you an American, do i have to instruct on your own history? Remember you live in a constitutional republic for a reason.
No it's not. Murder is never right, neither is child abuse.
So you are saying a law is equivalent to a moral good. I don't think so.
You haven't the slightest conception of what anarchy means.
I'll abuse the fuck out of your child... just let me baby-sit for a while.👍☺ -
2019-03-10 at 3:27 PM UTCI've provided all the arguing... and you've provided nothing. Son, you have no argument... you simply say mine isn't valid....lol. Don't you have any ideas of your own?👍
-
2019-03-10 at 3:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by WellHung I've provided all the arguing… and you've provided nothing. Son, you have no argument…👍
Get your glasses adjusted and re-read the thread then. Arguing for moral relativism is just arguing for exemption from the consequences of your actions. It's a weak position, and you cheerleading for it says more about you than it does about me. -
2019-03-10 at 3:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny if your son confessed to you that he have had sex with a child will yiu take this 12gauge, stick it up his ass and pull the trigger ?
will you ?
Did you miss this sick fuck?
Originally posted by Technologist If my child came to me and said he had pedophilic tendencies, you can bank I’d get him continued psychiatric help. Accepting this as normal, is not normal.
And this?
Originally posted by Technologist I can understand his point Specs. Any child can approach their parents and tell them they have pedophilic thoughts. Not sure, but they are probably born with these tendencies, similar to gays. And if anyone likens pedophiles to gays, there is a difference. What goes on between gays is consensual, child sexual assault is in no way consensual.
So any group of people, with any mental illness should be treated with compassion. Having said that, I don’t want or need to have it shoved in my face by Sophie or Benny/Vinny. Sophie seems intellectual, and seems to be able to carry a conversation without bringing his proclivities into it, but not Benny. He posts his sick thoughts all over this place, and you can bet I’m gonna take up for the victims.
Fuck off!
