Is cannibalism the easiest immoral deed to refute?

1. 2016-11-21 at 11:26 AM UTC

   #21
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   More importantly, is it morally ok to have sex with a dead chick?
2. 2016-11-21 at 11:29 AM UTC

   #22
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   Oh my god that faggot Lanny literally just edited his post:
   
   

   Originally posted by Lanny I don't think anyone really has an a priori moral objection cannibalism except on a like a scriptural level, in which case your "argument" is stupid and meaningless.

   
   Hahahahahahahahaha.
   
   Sophie, you're done.
3. 2016-11-21 at 11:31 AM UTC

   #23
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   >except on a like a scriptural level
4. 2016-11-21 at 11:32 AM UTC

   #24
   

   mmQ Lisa Turtle
   >the easiest immoral deed to refute
   
   No. Incest is.
5. 2016-11-21 at 11:37 AM UTC

   #25
   

   Sophie Pedophile Tech Support

   Originally posted by Enter Oh my god that faggot Lanny literally just edited his post:
   
   
   
   Hahahahahahahahaha.
   
   Sophie, you're done.

   
   I don't think you quite get it Enter, but that's ok.
6. 2016-11-21 at 11:39 AM UTC

   #26
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Sophie I am pretty sure that he meant that everyone that thinks about the issue from a logical philosophical standpoint doesn't think it is morally bad.

   
   Right, which is the point of my thread. That once you think about it from a philosophical standpoint, it isn't bad.
   
   

   Originally posted by Sophie You mistook Lanny for disagreeing with you.

   
   And he then goes on to say,
   
   

   Originally posted by Lanny your "argument" is stupid and meaningless.

   
   my argument being looking at it from a logical, philosophical standpoint.
   
   Get your nose out of Lanny's ass, you embarrassing fuck.
7. 2016-11-21 at 11:40 AM UTC

   #27
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Sophie I don't think you quite get it Enter, but that's ok.

   
   He's literally editing his originally post to save face. You really think there's anything left to defend? You can't even say what his original argument is anymore.
8. 2016-11-21 at 11:40 AM UTC

   #28
   

   Sophie Pedophile Tech Support

   Originally posted by Enter Right, which is the point of my thread. That once you think about it from a philosophical standpoint, it isn't bad.
   
   
   
   And he then goes on to say,
   
   
   
   my argument being looking at it from a logical, philosophical standpoint.
   
   Get your nose out of Lanny's ass, you embarrassing fuck.

   
   Again, disagreeing with your reasoning/argumentation is not the same as disagreeing with the point you make, idiot.
9. 2016-11-21 at 11:41 AM UTC

   #29
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Sophie Again, disagreeing with your reasoning/argumentation is not the same as disagreeing with the point you make, idiot.

   
   No calling Lanny out on editing his post, you four-eyed, brown skinned fuck?
10. 2016-11-21 at 11:43 AM UTC

    #30
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    The entire driving force behind your argument is "oh, Lanny could have meant the opposite of what he wrote".
11. 2016-11-21 at 11:44 AM UTC

    #31
    

    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support

    Originally posted by Enter No calling Lanny out on editing his post, you four-eyed, brown skinned fuck?

    
    
    
    You go on ahead and keep on calling me "brown-nosed suck up whatever the fuck" while ignoring my arguments bro. Dank debate.
12. 2016-11-21 at 11:45 AM UTC

    #32
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by Sophie
    
    You go on ahead and keep on calling me "brown-nosed suck up whatever the fuck" while ignoring my arguments bro. Dank debate.

    
    He wrote, in response to a post calling him out on ignoring an argument.
13. 2016-11-21 at 11:46 AM UTC

    #33
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    And that wasn't a brown-nosing comment.
14. 2016-11-21 at 11:47 AM UTC

    #34
    

    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support

    Originally posted by Enter He wrote, in response to a post calling him out on ignoring an argument.

    
    " No calling Lanny out on editing his post, you four-eyed, brown skinned fuck? "
    
    Is not an argument.
    
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument
15. 2016-11-21 at 11:51 AM UTC

    #35
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    He's literally editing his originally post to save face. You really think there's anything left to defend? You can't even say what his original argument is anymore.

    
    If that's not an argument, did it transcend into accepted truth?
16. 2016-11-21 at 11:52 AM UTC

    #36
    

    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Ignoring my posts doesn't make me any less right, baby entro.
17. 2016-11-21 at 11:53 AM UTC

    #37
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by mmQ Ignoring my posts doesn't make me any less right, baby entro.

    
    I only care about stef.
18. 2016-11-21 at 11:59 AM UTC

    #38
    

    mmQ Lisa Turtle

    Originally posted by Enter I only care about stef.

    
    Well, excUUUuuUUUuuUUUuuuUUUse ME! Here I thought you were genuinely interested in responses, I see now that it was a ploy to get into a pissing match with Sophie. You're no fun.
    
    
19. 2016-11-21 at 2:02 PM UTC

    #39
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    In the future you will be able to buy ground human from your butcher.
20. 2016-11-22 at 3:03 AM UTC

    #40
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Drinking breast milk probably easiest.