User Controls
If you could make $100,000 from a crime, would you?
-
2019-02-26 at 9:31 PM UTCThank you three for riding my joke tails.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-02-26 at 9:40 PM UTCJokes don’t have tails. I didn’t even see your post.
-
2019-02-26 at 9:40 PM UTCYou never heard the tail end of a joke before??
-
2019-02-26 at 9:42 PM UTCNo only the butt.
-
2019-02-26 at 10:01 PM UTC
-
2019-02-26 at 11:49 PM UTCYou guys know a hot dog stand up from the US and towards China in every thread about America that is in denial about living with his abusive boyfriend and his liberal goons will never feel as good as a meal of flesh and bone loss is not a good thing
-
2019-02-27 at 1:20 AM UTCI was trying to make it one of those conscience threads.
-
2019-02-27 at 6:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by GGG Its still decentralized. You don't know what that word means lol.
ok, if you insist that going to a center where IRS or whatever governmemt agency is laying in wait to cash out isnt a centralized thing
i guess it isnt then.
oh, did you mention registering thing where you have to put your information in a center ? -
2019-02-27 at 5:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ok, if you insist that going to a center where IRS or whatever governmemt agency is laying in wait to cash out isnt a centralized thing
i guess it isnt then.
oh, did you mention registering thing where you have to put your information in a center ?
You should google 'decentralized' because even if banks used it it would still be decentralized. The term refers to how blockchain works, not that there's no government involvement. It takes the creation and transfer of information out of the hands of banks and governments. That they tax or regulate it has no bearing on whether or not is decentralized.
Even xrapid is decentralized and its used exclusively by banks. Doesn't matter WHO uses it just that the power is not in a single entities control -
2019-02-27 at 5:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by GGG You should google 'decentralized' because even if banks used it it would still be decentralized. The term refers to how blockchain works, not that there's no government involvement. It takes the creation and transfer of information out of the hands of banks and governments. That they tax or regulate it has no bearing on whether or not is decentralized.
Even xrapid is decentralized and its used exclusively by banks. Doesn't matter WHO uses it just that the power is not in a single entities control
the intent for the desentralization seems to have escaped you. -
2019-02-28 at 7:06 AM UTCbenny's trolling you, he's not actually this stupid
-
2019-02-28 at 7:09 AM UTCOn the internet?
-
2019-02-28 at 7:09 AM UTCNah
-
2019-03-01 at 12:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny poor people who never had 100ks.
a hundred k is really easy to launder provided that you arent lazy. just invest in things like Bill Krozbydog food stand business and you can easily "earn" a few hundred dollars of income a day. and in a year you'd have earned yourself a clean 100k and more assuming people actually buy foods from you.
Any cash business really. Something where people pay in cash, private sales, barber shop, etc. Art is a great way to do it, although you have to have some way of explaining where you got your materials. If it's sculptures, you could just fire a bunch of clay art pieces and "sell" them to a lot of people. A clay statue, even a plaster one, can be hundreds of dollars.
Prices on buddhas and such. Painting is a good way but you have to be dealing with art supply places to get canvas, paint, etc.
Anything that basically comes from the ground works well because you don't have a paper trail for materials. That is also why selling plants, exotic herbs and such, can also work well for explaining income.
And anyone that thinks you can't retire on 100,000$ is fucking cray cray. Aldra usually makes sense....
Maybe 100,000 in new york won't get you very far, but in a lot of places that's enough to buy several houses or plots of land which you can definitely retire on. -
2019-03-01 at 12:31 AM UTCLaw Enforcement won't even get off their ass for 100k. It's a small sum of money, organised crime is $100k a week plus, because you have so many expenses in making that 100k you're lucky if you even have 10k of it left over for yourself by the time it's all over.
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers Maybe 100,000 in new york won't get you very far, but in a lot of places that's enough to buy several houses or plots of land which you can definitely retire on.
Have fun growing your own spuds in Rwanda. -
2019-03-01 at 12:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING V: A Cat-Girl/Boy Under Every Bed Law Enforcement won't even get off their ass for 100k. It's a small sum of money, organised crime is $100k a week plus, because you have so many expenses in making that 100k you're lucky if you even have 10k of it left over for yourself by the time it's all over.
Have fun growing your own spuds in Rwanda.
Or Texas... Not that I'd be growing potatoes, although they are piss easy and yield a shit-ton. Texas isn't the only state with cheap land or houses. Sure, if you want to live in a "nice" area, 100,000 isn't enough. Some of you are really picky. I've actually lived in the ghetto, where violent crimes and shootings are common. I actually don't mind it all that much, and places like that, or out in the desert, land and houses are cheap. -
2019-03-01 at 12:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers Or Texas… Not that I'd be growing potatoes, although they are piss easy and yield a shit-ton. Texas isn't the only state with cheap land or houses. Sure, if you want to live in a "nice" area, 100,000 isn't enough. Some of you are really picky. I've actually lived in the ghetto, where violent crimes and shootings are common. I actually don't mind it all that much, and places like that, or out in the desert, land and houses are cheap.
OK, so how do you expect to live ~50 years on ~$2k a year out in the desert?
You'd better get real good at hunting those liserds or something. -
2019-03-01 at 12:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING V: A Cat-Girl/Boy Under Every Bed OK, so how do you expect to live ~50 years on ~$2k a year out in the desert?
You'd better get real good at hunting those liserds or something.
Huh? Me personally, I wouldn't be spending the money on food and such. Just the land or house, possibly more than one since I'm not a dumbass that needs a 500,000$ house to feel content. I would rather have a big fucking yard than a big house, or a house in a "nice" area.
Most people are spoiled candy asses, so asking this question here even, is kinda stupid. It's not like any of these people would know what to do with that money. None of them have ever faced any real hardship, and chances are very few have any survival skills at all.... The thing that gets most people is rent or house payments. If you simply bought a couple acres of land or what would be cheaper even, a small house, you wouldn't need to worry about expenses. Your main expense would be gone forever. Then you can do whatever the fuck you want. That means if you have a job or other source of income, you get to keep most of it or spend it however you want. Obtaining wealth is a lot fucking easier when you no longer have to pay rent or make house payments. Most people will never own anything except a vehicle. And a lot of people are content with that too. To each their own. The government wouldn't like it very much if most people would be content simply having a couple acres of land to live on. They function by having people crave shit they don't need. That is also why they hate communists and made up an excuse to burn women and children alive in Waco, Texas. None of the people living there had to pay rent or taxes. -
2019-03-01 at 1 AM UTCTheoretically, if a person was ready to take the risk for 100K, best bet would be hit a few bingo parlors. Full of old people, maybe one person there is going to put up a fight. It's pretty well all cash. Cash room is usually in the back and the back door is often propped open for ventilation. Theoretically, closing time you could pull in about $30K-50K per parlor, if they are the larger kind that seat a couple hundred people.
-
2019-03-01 at 1:03 AM UTCI'm convinced this dude has never actually seen money
