2019-02-27 at 4:07 AM UTC
gadzooks
Dark Matter
[keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
Numbers are for lesser evolved individuals.
I refer to all things as subservient entities. The quantity in which they come is irrelevant.
2019-02-27 at 4:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ
two = several, few, a couple, dub
several = 2,3,4
few = 2,3
a couple = 2,3 (yep)
dub = 2, 20
no, 2 is not several. several implies at least 3+, and most likely 4+, since i would only use few to describe 3. a couple means 2, definitely not 3. the rest is alright but idk where the hell you learned that shit
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-02-27 at 4:22 AM UTC
So the divider seems to be SEVERAL . You fucking DOLTS think it means 3+. Are you SCARED that it could just mean 2? Does it FRIGHTEN YOU?
2019-02-27 at 4:39 AM UTC
You fuckers might be right. Maybe several does mean 3+. The more I think about, the more i think I'm wrong. I'm about ready to change my mind, just give me several more minutes to decide
2019-02-27 at 4:41 AM UTC
I decided I'm right. Several can mean two. Thank you.
2019-02-27 at 4:41 AM UTC
gadzooks
Dark Matter
[keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
Lol I don't even know.
Full disclosure, I didn't put much thought into it myself.
The only terms you used that kinda evoked somewhat of an opinion in me were COUPLE vs FEW.
COUPLE really should be reserved for a quantity of TWO.
A FEW is way harder to pin down, but it should reflect TWO OR MORE. Most often, more than two, but two is acceptable in some cases, IMO.
As far as the upper limits of "FEW" go... that's way trickier to define in a reliable and consistent manner.
2019-02-27 at 4:42 AM UTC
AND YES I STARED AT MY SCREEN WAITING FOR 2 MINUTES TO PASS BEFORE I DID THAT WHAT OF IT????? FITE ME IRL BITCH
