User Controls
Ann Coulter Fires Back at Trump: 'The Only National Emergency Is that Our President Is an Idiot'
-
2019-02-19 at 10:33 PM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 10:47 PM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 10:54 PM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 10:55 PM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 10:57 PM UTCThe simple explanation for race realism is that 86 IQ Cletus feels real good when it says white people have an average IQ of 103, cuz he's white and pretty average so that must mean he ain't as dumb as they say.
-
2019-02-19 at 11:03 PM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 11:06 PM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 11:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by omn5;pvl yep
people can ignore it at their peril and trot out the tired old pseudoscience lines but with all the new genomic data becoming available and new analytic techniques we're starting to gather good evidence of genetic mediation of trait differences in human populations
this analysis using intelligence related alleles identified through GWAS to compare jedis with non-jedis and test greg cochran's ashkenazi intelligence hypothesis was published a month ago and i've yet to see any valid critiques of it: https://rpubs.com/Jonatan/jedi_pgs
there are also lots of admixture studies coming out which demonstrate that cognitive ability can be predicted by percentage european ancestry: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317552097_Admixture_in_Argentina
fascinating stuff, the ability to follow the latest developments in pop genetics and differential psychology almost in real time is pretty much the only thing i like about the world in 2019
The question is whether or not they preserve any old intuition of race categorization, of the kind black and white.
You can't just change the subject, then expect that to establish a point. -
2019-02-20 at 2:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING V: A Cat-Girl/Boy Under Every Bed Don't we live in a world with 23 and Me, polygenic analysis, and CRISPR?
Geneticists are finding SNPs that are linked to intelligence, aggression, time preference and other traits constantly.
And then establishing the origins and estimating the prevalences of those same SNPs in ancestral groups.
I mean what the fuck?
I'm actually embarrassed that this is even a discussion we are having.
Listen dumbass, you've been attacking this same strawman this entire thread. Read this post carefully because you're clearly having a hard time.
No one has denied the effects of genetics on a broad range of traits, no one has even attempted to argue that traits aren't heritable or that there aren't significantly different phenotypic distributions of traits between genetic populations. You're not arguing against a position anyone actually holds.
The problem is when you pretend like "white" is a meaningful definition of a genetic population. It's not. It's a bag of phenotypes and social constructs. Again, see beauty. Genetics is part of what makes a person beautiful, but there is no beauty gene, beautiful people aren't a genetic population, and ideas about what counts as beauty change with time and place. I don't deny the existence of race or genetic populations, I just don't pretend like they're the same thing. -
2019-02-20 at 3:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Listen dumbass, you've been attacking this same strawman this entire thread. Read this post carefully because you're clearly having a hard time.
No one has denied the effects of genetics on a broad range of traits, no one has even attempted to argue that traits aren't heritable or that there aren't significantly different phenotypic distributions of traits between genetic populations. You're not arguing against a position anyone actually holds.
The problem is when you pretend like "white" is a meaningful definition of a genetic population. It's not. It's a bag of phenotypes and social constructs. Again, see beauty. Genetics is part of what makes a person beautiful, but there is no beauty gene, beautiful people aren't a genetic population, and ideas about what counts as beauty change with time and place. I don't deny the existence of race or genetic populations, I just don't pretend like they're the same thing.
again, what should 'race' define ? -
2019-02-20 at 4:09 AM UTC
-
2019-02-20 at 7:31 AM UTC
-
2019-02-20 at 7:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Not very well though. You know how much disgusting thai ladyboy porn I have to wade through when I search for laotian ladyboy porn? And how many ugly chinese hos be trying to pass for korean? Porn industry really is colorblind.
you only need korean when your looking for legal child porn. -
2019-02-20 at 9:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by Mahmoud The simple explanation for race realism is that 86 IQ Cletus feels real good when it says white people have an average IQ of 103, cuz he's white and pretty average so that must mean he ain't as dumb as they say.
Isn't 86 the average IQ of Pakistan?
Oh no wait it's 84.
https://photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html
Among UK immigrants it's 86 - even blacks score higher.
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/so-the-immigrants-that-have-been-flooding-into-the-uk-really-are-low-iq
LMAOR
Originally posted by Lanny I don't deny the existence of race or genetic populations
So basically you want to launch some sort of stupid semantic attack on the word itself, instead of arguing about facts. -
2019-02-20 at 10:18 AM UTC
-
2019-02-20 at 10:39 AM UTC
-
2019-02-20 at 11:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING V: A Cat-Girl/Boy Under Every Bed Isn't 86 the average IQ of Pakistan?
Oh no wait it's 84.
https://photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html
Among UK immigrants it's 86 - even blacks score higher.
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/so-the-immigrants-that-have-been-flooding-into-the-uk-really-are-low-iq
LMAOR
Mad white kid loses argument to apex intellect Paki, retreats to racial averages to make himself feel better.
Yeah, totally not exactly what I predicted. -
2019-02-20 at 11:58 AM UTC
-
2019-02-20 at 12:21 PM UTC
-
2019-02-20 at 12:28 PM UTC