User Controls
Ann Coulter Fires Back at Trump: 'The Only National Emergency Is that Our President Is an Idiot'
-
2019-02-19 at 11:17 AM UTCYeah, this shit is just too confusing for us, and we need to shut up and let the big brained people talk shite.
-
2019-02-19 at 11:26 AM UTCPlease refute this totally legit journal by reputable scientist who was ousted by "the man":
http://timecube.2enp.com -
2019-02-19 at 11:34 AM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 11:38 AM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 11:40 AM UTCHave you all ever stopped to consider that you're all fucking stupid as shit and nothing matters because I made you that way and everything you talk about is fodder for laughter BETWIXT ME AND MY DAD?
snowglobe discussion you're all fucking worthless -
2019-02-19 at 11:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jesus Have you all ever stopped to consider that you're all fucking stupid as shit and nothing matters because I made you that way and everything you talk about is fodder for laughter BETWIXT ME AND MY DAD?
snowglobe discussion you're all fucking worthless
jedis killed you though, my dude, so at least let us hate them. -
2019-02-19 at 11:44 AM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 11:51 AM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 12:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by omn5;pvl what facts? the only ones that matter are those directly relevant to his scientific claims. maybe he's an ethnonationalist, maybe he has indeed harassed jedis on twitter, doesn't change the fact that his arguments are substantive
So substantive that he has never been published anywhere but on a blog where there are a grand total of 31 "papers", 60% of which are authored by the guy who owns the site.my post is the only openpsych citation returned by the search function, but nice lie, it's okay to admit that you googled the author's name and followed the first link hoping to find some way to weasel out of having to address the paper itself
Lots of things don't come up in the search. Pretty much everything before the switch to ISS is gone AFAIK.you refuse to even give the paper a cursory glance so it's not surprising that you don't want to discuss it on here
It is a 100 page paper. Again, I have presented my arguments and you claim to have read the paper. If that's the case, quote exactly what is in the paper that objects to anything that I said. This is basic burden of proof on your side. That's why citations have page numbers.literally all of them, it's 100 pages long and covers every nuance and permutation of the race argument i've ever come across. i'm not going to spoonfeed you any further, i already pointed you to the resource which you can use to learn about something you obviously haven't researched beyond looking at irrational wiki pages. i know you have the iq of a toddler so it might be hard, but even a 3 year old can use a spoon
If it's everything then it a be pretty easy to pick out a couple and destroy me, right?
Wait, have YOU read the paper?
already familiar with it, in my experience it's often cited to handwave away detailed and potentially legitimate critiques of a position by someone who doesn't want to bother with stress testing their worldview, as you appear to be doing now
It's more that nobody is going to attack a 100 page blog just because you don't have any actual science. -
2019-02-19 at 12:22 PM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 12:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Mahmoud Please refute this totally legit journal by reputable scientist who was ousted by "the man":
http://timecube.2enp.com -
2019-02-19 at 12:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Mahmoud Niggers are humans with a black skin phenotype. I don't have a technical problem with that categorization. Just don't try to extend it beyond that, because you will lose.
I dunno, different nose, different coat, different average muscular and skeletal structure, sounds like a big difference to me. -
2019-02-19 at 12:43 PM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 12:51 PM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 12:51 PM UTCBlacks are literally not human and that can be genetically verified
-
2019-02-19 at 1:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Mahmoud Just don't try to extend it beyond that, because you will lose.
I genuinely want to understand this position.
So is your thesis that humans that evolve to live in different environments will wind up identical?
Mentally or physically or both?
Do you believe in evolution?
Do you believe that DNA encodes the brain?
Do you believe that the brain is the origin of the mind?
Do you believe two people can have different brain structures, but be the same mentally? -
2019-02-19 at 2:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Number13 I dunno, different nose, different coat, different average muscular and skeletal structure, sounds like a big difference to me.
Nope. There are millions of blacks (and whites, and azns) that form the phenotypic averages, who aren't accurately described by them. You could probably parse average differences in similar results by sorting for height, for example. -
2019-02-19 at 2:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING V: A Cat-Girl/Boy Under Every Bed I genuinely want to understand this position.
So is your thesis that humans that evolve to live in different environments will wind up identical?
Mentally or physically or both?
Do you believe in evolution?
Do you believe that DNA encodes the brain?
Do you believe that the brain is the origin of the mind?
Do you believe two people can have different brain structures, but be the same mentally?
If you genuinely wanted to understand the position, you would close your cockholster and read my previous posts.
I've never once taken an issue with genetics, evolution, nor claimed some sort of immaterial will.
My "thesis" is that genetics don't and will never validate categorization that remotely resembles anything like the concept of black, white, asian, jedi etc.
It's not a tough concept to grasp. -
2019-02-19 at 2:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by Mahmoud My "thesis" is that genetics don't and will never validate categorization that remotely resembles anything like the concept of black, white, asian, jedi etc.
Complex systems require judgements. If you aren't prepared to make judgements, then genetics don't define anything - human, dog, cat, etc. You can't define a company, or a house, or a computer, etc.
It obviously matters deeply to you that people not judge you. -
2019-02-19 at 3:17 PM UTCassholes arguing about races without first clearly define what race is.