User Controls
Ann Coulter Fires Back at Trump: 'The Only National Emergency Is that Our President Is an Idiot'
-
2019-02-19 at 12:58 AM UTC
Originally posted by omn5;pvl yes yes, don't even read the paper or consider its arguments, handwave it away because muh peer review and muh evil white nationalists
revel in your ignorance and toe the progressive social science establishment's line as they work to suppress open empirical study of race issues, but better hope you don't live long enough to see the consequences flawed egalitarian thinking will have on the future viability of civilization
That's what every crackpot who gets rejected by the people who know their shit says. -
2019-02-19 at 1:01 AM UTCWe should do a poll of how many Americans know that HPV and HIV aren't the same disease.
-
2019-02-19 at 1:10 AM UTCand people say Trump is an idiot lmao
-
2019-02-19 at 1:40 AM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 2:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by omn5;pvl true, but it's also possible for the academic establishment to leverage its hegemony and the blind trust laymen place in the peer review process to thwart researchers who can legitimately challenge the orthodoxy, labeling them crackpots and pseudoscientists and discrediting them in the public view
this is ostensibly what happened with fuerst given that all the attacks against him are focused on his politics and views on unrelated topics rather than his methodology
A lot of things are "possible".
Until you establish that it is the case, the null hypothesis is that they are rejected from science journals because... they aren't contributing legitimate scientific output, just like every other fucking crank.
The same reason why perpetual motion machines are denied patents, and it's not because the jedis and NWO want to keep free energy from the public.
The same reason why creationism isn't published, and it's not because "science" hates Christ.
John Fuerst is a nrckbeard who cannot get published so he posts on a forum. Just out of curiousity, what do you think his credentials are? -
2019-02-19 at 2:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by Mahmoud The offspring's reproductive viability is built into the definition of species.
Offspring from such interspecies breeding are called hybrids and are usually infertile.
Coydogs and coywolves are able to reproduce, wolfdogs too though that's different, so not in this case, nigger. -
2019-02-19 at 2:59 AM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 3:22 AM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 5:09 AM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 5:21 AM UTCZok is a nigger
-
2019-02-19 at 7:12 AM UTCDestroying the concepts of race, gender and species really seems to matter to these people on a deep emotional level, which is pathetic and pathological and requires an explanation in and of itself.
-
2019-02-19 at 8:05 AM UTCOk catboy lol
-
2019-02-19 at 8:30 AM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 9:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING V: A Cat-Girl/Boy Under Every Bed Destroying the concepts of race, gender and species really seems to matter to these people on a deep emotional level, which is pathetic and pathological and requires an explanation in and of itself.
"wrong"
Neither captain nor I deny that race is a very real thing, no one rejects race in concept. Some of us just don't have a vested ideological interest in pretending like race is equivalent to genetics. No one denies that populations have varying genetics, that's trivially obvious, the point is that race is a social notion that was formed prior to any genetic understanding, and so it's not a sufficient proxy for membership in a meaningful genetic population. -
2019-02-19 at 9:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny "wrong"
Neither captain nor I deny that race is a very real thing, no one rejects race in concept. Some of us just don't have a vested ideological interest in pretending like race is equivalent to genetics. No one denies that populations have varying genetics, that's trivially obvious, the point is that race is a social notion that was formed prior to any genetic understanding, and so it's not a sufficient proxy for membership in a meaningful genetic population.
define 'race'. -
2019-02-19 at 9:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny "wrong"
Neither captain nor I deny that race is a very real thing, no one rejects race in concept. Some of us just don't have a vested ideological interest in pretending like race is equivalent to genetics. No one denies that populations have varying genetics, that's trivially obvious, the point is that race is a social notion that was formed prior to any genetic understanding, and so it's not a sufficient proxy for membership in a meaningful genetic population.
Are you trying to imply that people didn't start to understand that children resemble their parents until modern science came about? -
2019-02-19 at 9:51 AM UTC
-
2019-02-19 at 10:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny No, that's not what I'm implying at all lol
Then I can't make head nor tail of your post, and can't help but suspect it's intended to be deliberately confusing.
Race is a phenomenon of genetics, and if it didn't exist it would be created as it is useful for all sorts of things. -
2019-02-19 at 10:56 AM UTC
Originally posted by omn5;pvl lmfao i just realized that you didn't actually know who he was beforehand and pulled your criticisms straight off his irrational wiki smear page
Nope, but you sound real desperate to downplay the facts. If I tell you a dog is a mammal and it's corroborated by Wikipedia, doesn't mean I got it off Wikipedia. I've been cited openpsych papers on NIS, including this one.
I'll put it another way: I'm not going to get into a forum argument with some neckbeard who isn't here, because openpsych is literally no different than posting something here.
I'll put it a third way: which of my statements in this thread does the paper specifically address? Cite them and quote them. It's not my job to refute every aspect of every dogshit blog you pinch out. If you disagree with something I said, throw it at me.
Get familiar with this concept:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop -
2019-02-19 at 11 AM UTC
