User Controls
GDPR and the recent emphasis on privacy
-
2019-02-09 at 5:29 AM UTC^ you have gender malpractice.
-
2019-02-09 at 7:33 AM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
-
2019-02-09 at 7:47 AM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
Lammy I'm trying to work up the enthusiasm to debunk your happy make believe about how the world works, but I'm lacking.
Here's an alternative application of the right to privacy/right be forgotten.
https://www.thejournal.ie/denis-obrien-high-court-rte-2157499-Jun2015/
Will the commie go to bat for the billionaire, his high priced legal team, and his right to hide from the people his dealings with their own businesses (IBRC is run by the Irish Government -it was created to funnel money to banks during the bank bailouts)? -
2019-02-09 at 11:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life Lammy I'm trying to work up the enthusiasm to debunk your happy make believe about how the world works, but I'm lacking.
Here's an alternative application of the right to privacy/right be forgotten.
https://www.thejournal.ie/denis-obrien-high-court-rte-2157499-Jun2015/
Will the commie go to bat for the billionaire, his high priced legal team, and his right to hide from the people his dealings with their own businesses (IBRC is run by the Irish Government -it was created to funnel money to banks during the bank bailouts)?
"I don't have any actual argument but trust me, you're wrong, I just know. P.S. Here's a link that doesn't really relate to anything, ima just pretend like it is somehow a response to prior points" -
2019-02-09 at 12:58 PM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
Originally posted by Eval/Apply "I don't have any actual argument but trust me, you're wrong, I just know. P.S. Here's a link that doesn't really relate to anything, ima just pretend like it is somehow a response to prior points"
Lanny's rebuttal to me focused on how he seems to think that hiding the fact that a doctor has a bad past from prospective patients is tolerable.
But only the rich, such as Doctors and Billionaire businessmen, can afford to access the court procedure to enforce their "right to be forgotten".
I contend again that GDPR is about hiding who knows who, what people are up to, who is where, etc. And the motivations behind that seem to me to be very suspect.
Which is more likely - politicians genuinely care about the public, or just don't want their sleazy personal affairs known to the public?
Maybe I'm cynical.
What would history look like if privacy law was enforced in old times? Could Julius Caesar assert his right to be forgotten? -
2019-02-09 at 1:01 PM UTCthat is lanny, he got taboo bannedThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-02-09 at 1:32 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-02-09 at 1:43 PM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
-
2019-02-09 at 1:51 PM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
I also think that there's also a deeper layer to privacy, a layer of bugman-ism, such that whatever we do is no longer going to have consequences.
Julius Caesar is actually a great example as he was a man of decision and action. He gambled everything and invaded Gaul then gambled again and broke Roman law and invaded Rome itself, saying "Alea iacta est" (the die has been rolled) as he led his armies across the Rubicon.
He had the sort of life that wasn't about sneaking around, having secrets, hiding from his past (apart from his creditors), and pretending to be something he wasn't.
And whatever about GDPR, the right to be forgotten isn't at all about protecting people's freedom to do whatever the fuck they want, but 100% about allowing people cover up their previous public actions in order to allow them to pretend to be something they aren't. -
2019-02-09 at 1:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life I also think that there's also a deeper layer to privacy, a layer of bugman-ism, such that whatever we do is no longer going to have consequences.
Julius Caesar is actually a great example as he was a man of decision and action. He gambled everything and invaded Gaul then gambled again and broke Roman law and invaded Rome itself, saying "Alea iacta est" (the die has been rolled) as he led his armies across the Rubicon.
He had the sort of life that wasn't about sneaking around, having secrets, hiding from his past (apart from his creditors), and pretending to be something he wasn't.
And whatever about GDPR, the right to be forgotten isn't at all about protecting people's freedom to do whatever the fuck they want, but 100% about allowing people cover up their previous public actions in order to allow them to pretend to be something they aren't.
i think the going ons in virginia is pretty clear.
people are being reremembered for their black faces some 30+ years ago. -
2019-02-09 at 1:58 PM UTCI started writing a thread a while back but never finished it on the premise that using any of these services that trade in personal information is literally selling your soul and can potentially be tied to old religious texts in that sense.
In most cultures what your soul actually is is fairly vague, but generally speaking it's the part of you that can't be quantified physically - your values, your accomplishments, your relationships... All things that are now being traded as a commodity. In terms of the bible it would've been much easier to talk about the mystical concept of a 'soul' than the concept of a persons thoughts, habits and relationships being compiled into a profile and essentially used to control them.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-02-09 at 1:59 PM UTC
-
2019-02-09 at 2:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I started writing a thread a while back but never finished it on the premise that using any of these services that trade in personal information is literally selling your soul and can potentially be tied to old religious texts in that sense.
In most cultures what your soul actually is is fairly vague, but generally speaking it's the part of you that can't be quantified physically - your values, your accomplishments, your relationships… All things that are now being traded as a commodity. In terms of the bible it would've been much easier to talk about the mystical concept of a 'soul' than the concept of a persons thoughts, habits and relationships being compiled into a profile and essentially used to control them.
really ?
i thought all cultures had been rather clear with what a soul is.
it goes by many different names. some call it spirits, some call it ghosts, doctors call it consciousness, -
2019-02-09 at 2:07 PM UTC
