What's your thank: post ratio?

1. 2016-03-15 at 3:28 AM UTC

   #61
   Kek Houston

   Did you take into account posts per day?

   
   Posts per day objectively doesnt matter according to the Law of Thanks Post Ratio as established by op. Stop trying make such low value excuses for your low value life.
2. 2016-03-15 at 3:29 AM UTC

   #62
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   You have learned nothing.
3. 2016-03-15 at 3:35 AM UTC

   #63
   Kek Houston
   Are you saying that your formula is inherently flawed? You have yet to demonstrate that posts per day has anything to do with poster value and it is completely disregarded in the forumla. Further I have demonstrated that I have a higher poster value than everyone in this thread, that I proved that your "timeless δ" is a false representation, then I proved that True Timeless δ is an accurate representation and that analysis of your accounts and post history show a high forum codependency. I will be ready to RIP any of the (quite obvious and badly constructed) low value fallacies you choose to retort with.
4. 2016-03-15 at 3:52 AM UTC

   #64
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   cringe hanson is basically what happens when you put a basic bitch in a basic room with a basic acer for a year because nobody wants to play with them. Your cringe to post ratio is at best 1.2. You are not intelligent at all, you just spend a lot of time by yourself.
   
   Also, 1:1 isn't perfect thanks/post symbiosis because multiple people can thank the same post. You are dumb, boring and awkward so might as well call you vizier 2.0
5. 2016-03-15 at 4:24 AM UTC

   #65
   Kek Houston

   cringe hanson

   
   Terrible insult. Low value, low energy.
   
   

   is basically what happens when you put a basic bitch

   
   Again terrible low value insult. Zero energy guy right here.
   
   

   in a basic room

   
   Another terribly low value insult
   
   

   with a basic acer

   
   Such a bad insult that neither terrible nor low value doesnt even describe it
   
   

   for a year because nobody wants to play with them.

   
   Objectively projecting. Terrible insult. Its also quite cute that you still want to "play"
   
   

   Your cringe to post ratio is at best 1.2.

   
   This objectively does not matter since my poster value is higher than yours.
   
   

   You are not intelligent at all,

   
   This is objectively false. Since I am such a high value poster it follows that I have a high value intelligence.
   
   

   you just spend a lot of time by yourself.

   
   Again objectively false.
   
   

   Also, 1:1 isn't perfect thanks/post symbiosis because multiple people can thank the same post.

   
   This is correct but its still retarded.
   
   

   You are dumb,

   
   Another low value insult
   
   

   boring

   
   low
   
   

   and awkward

   
   value
   
   

   so might as well call you vizier 2.0

   
   insult
   
   
6. 2016-03-15 at 4:45 AM UTC

   #66
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   well I didn't read but the extremely defensive layout of your post gave me warm tingles in my PQ
7. 2016-03-15 at 4:50 AM UTC

   #67
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   He broke down the post. Breakdown. He's having a breakdown.
8. 2016-03-15 at 4:56 AM UTC

   #68
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   He was already broken, he just thought he found a way to look like he was fixed for a second
9. 2016-03-15 at 5:55 AM UTC

   #69
   Kek Houston
   [greentext]>implying[/greentext]
   [greentext]>implications[/greentext]
   [greentext]>projected implications[/greentext]
   [greentext]>assumptions[/greentext]
   [greentext]>persuasions[/greentext]
   
   I fucking love this forum.