User Controls
NIS Statistics
-
2018-11-29 at 5:36 PM UTCAlso, by the way...
He (infinityshock) communicates at a sub 4th grade level...
He got a score of 4.8 on the Dale-Chall readability score (based on the difficulty level of the words you use):
Score Notes
4.9 or lower easily understood by an average 4th-grade student or lower
5.0–5.9 easily understood by an average 5th or 6th-grade student
6.0–6.9 easily understood by an average 7th or 8th-grade student
7.0–7.9 easily understood by an average 9th or 10th-grade student
8.0–8.9 easily understood by an average 11th or 12th-grade student
9.0–9.9 easily understood by an average 13th to 15th-grade (college) student -
2018-11-29 at 5:38 PM UTCDid Dale account for people trolling his test?
-
2018-11-29 at 5:40 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Did Dale account for people trolling his test?
Well, you can technically troll any test. You could give yourself an epinephrine shot right before getting a physical and troll the doctor into thinking you're way too hyperactive.
The point is, is he really 100% trolling? Or are some facets of his actual personality making their way into his posts? -
2018-11-29 at 5:43 PM UTCToss him a bone and see how he responds.
-
2018-11-29 at 5:44 PM UTCOn the Flesch Reading Ease Formula, he got a NEGATIVE score, which they do admit is possible, just unlikely:
The following table can be helpful to assess the ease of readability in a document.
The table is an example of values. While the maximum score is 121.22, there is no limit on how low the score can be. A negative score is valid.
Score Difficulty
90-100 Very Easy
80-89 Easy
70-79 Fairly Easy
60-69 Standard
50-59 Fairly Difficult
30-49 Difficult
0-29 Very Confusing
His score: -835.88 -
2018-11-29 at 5:45 PM UTCEdgar Dale. Look at his cone of experience
In 1946, Dale introduced the Cone of Experience concept in a textbook on audiovisual methods in teaching. He revised it for a second printing in 1954 and again in 1969.[7]
An example of the false "cone of learning" attributed to Dale
Dale's "Cone of Experience," which he intended to provide an intuitive model of the concreteness of various kinds of audiovisual media, has been widely misrepresented. Often referred to as the "Cone of Learning," it purports to inform viewers of how much people remember based on how they encounter information.
However, Dale included no numbers and did not base his cone on scientific research, and he also warned readers not to take the cone too seriously.[8] The numbers originated from 1967, when a Mobil oil company employee, D.G. Treichler, published a non-scholarly article in Film and Audio-Visual Communications.[9][10]
-
2018-11-29 at 5:46 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:47 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:47 PM UTCSounds legit
-
2018-11-29 at 5:47 PM UTCIs there a possibility he wasn't alone or wasn't even real? That Stat sounds exceptionally skewed.
-
2018-11-29 at 5:49 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:49 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:50 PM UTCOh I see. I could use something like that for my blog.
-
2018-11-29 at 5:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by cupocheer OP, as long as you recognize that the use of the words: nigga(s) & nigger(s) are NOT the same eord definition. Right?
Nigger(s) is racist
Nigga(s) is NOT, necessarily. racist.
I'm not too sure what this has to do with anything...
He definitely used the words "N.I.G.G.E.R." and "N.I.G.G.E.R.S." hundreds of times. -
2018-11-29 at 5:51 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:51 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:53 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:53 PM UTC
-
2018-11-29 at 5:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Will you please do my word cloud?
There are two main reasons why I won't just whip one of these up for just anybody (at least not immediately or anything):
1. Bandwith issues. It's not really fair to Lanny to be making so many repeated requests in such a short amount of time to collect all this data.
2. It takes a bit of my own time, and I'm technically supposed to be working right now on, like, you know, actual work.
But I will do one for you mmQ, and a few others on here that I like and/or would simply find the results interesting.
Just not right away.