User Controls
SCIENTISTS : WE WERE WRONG, TIME AND TIME AGAIN.
-
2018-09-27 at 7:33 AM UTCa collection of when 'scientists' admit they have no idea what they're talking about.
https://www.livescience.com/63692-standard-model-broken-supersymmetry-new-physics.html -
2018-09-27 at 7:51 PM UTCBookmark to read later.
-
2018-09-27 at 7:58 PM UTCThat's an unusually well written article. Most science articles are written by people who obviously have no idea what they're on about.
-
2018-09-28 at 2:52 AM UTCnigger
-
2018-09-28 at 5:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by apt
what are you talking about ? did you even click it ?
the first 2 paragraphs essentially already laid bare this claim :Physicists don't know what it is exactly. But they do know it's some sort of cosmic ray — a high-energy particle that's blasted its way through space, into the Earth, and back out again. But the particles physicists know about — the collection of particles that make up what scientists call the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics — shouldn't be able to do that. Sure, there are low-energy neutrinos that can pierce through miles upon miles of rock unaffected. But high-energy neutrinos, as well as other high-energy particles, have "large cross-sections." That means that they'll almost always crash into something soon after zipping into the Earth and never make it out the other side.
And yet, since March 2016, researchers have been puzzling over two events in Antarctica where cosmic rays did burst out from the Earth, and were detected by NASA's Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) — a balloon-borne antenna drifting over the southern continent. -
2018-09-28 at 5:31 AM UTC97% btw
-
2018-09-28 at 5:40 AM UTCDark matter. Worm Holes.
-
2018-09-28 at 5:42 AM UTCPART 2 : IS PLUTO A PLANET AND WILL YOU CALL ME LATER ?
YES, NO, MAYBE ....
https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/pluto-true-planet-043243/In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) set forth a new set of guidelines for what constitutes a planet. In a decision that surprised and even infuriated a lot of people, the commission announced that Pluto could no longer be considered a planet, in light of these new guidelines — and, ever since, the scientific community has debated Pluto’s place and status in the solar system.
[snipped]
instead the researchers found over 100 recent examples where researchers had used the word planet in a way that would violate the IAU definition. “They are doing it because it’s functionally useful,” Metzger said. -
2018-09-28 at 9:13 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny PART 2 : IS PLUTO A PLANET AND WILL YOU CALL ME LATER ?
YES, NO, MAYBE ….
https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/pluto-true-planet-043243/
The logical thing to do was to regard newly discovered Planet X's, such as Eris and Sedna, as planets, but the jedis already hated Pluto because according to their occultic tradition there are only 8 planets in the universe (there are 9 planets in western astrology).
The IAUs new criteria for what constitutes a planet (clears its own orbit) made zero sense, and people said as much, but as always they were determined to manipulate reality in order to get the number they wanted.
Also isn't it amazing how Science! and Pozzpedia claims that the long theorised Planet X was disproved back in the 1990, despite Eris, Sedna, etc being discovered only in the 2000s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planets_beyond_Neptune#Planet_X_disproved -
2018-09-28 at 9:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning The logical thing to do was to regard newly discovered Planet X's, such as Eris and Sedna, as planets, but the jedis already hated Pluto because according to their occultic tradition there are only 8 planets in the universe (there are 9 planets in western astrology).
Did we sign the White Gold Concodat while I wasn't looking? Pluto acnowledgement/Talos worship are banned now? Damned Thalmor...
-
2018-09-28 at 9:47 AM UTCPluto is cute why would anyone wanna be mean to it? :(
-
2018-09-28 at 12:44 PM UTCWhen science and politics collide: pseudoscience. Just a bunch of quacks taking very large paychecks.
-
2018-09-28 at 1:36 PM UTCThe science of science is progressive. It’s not climbing up a straight,taught rope,it’s manipulating the branches of a tree,till you reach the definitive top.
-
2018-09-28 at 4:04 PM UTCI've always been curious about the psychology behind the psychology of psychology.
-
2018-09-28 at 4:07 PM UTCIt’s deeply psychological
-
2018-09-28 at 5:06 PM UTCCern demons, brah.
-
2018-09-28 at 5:11 PM UTCThe Earth is obviously flat!
(Although sometimes it is hilly or mountainous.) -
2018-10-18 at 7:33 PM UTCPART III : LIFE ON EARTH IS AT LEAST 3,700,000,000 YEARS OLD AND WE HAVE FOSSILS TO PROVE IT.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/377-billion-year-old-fossils-stake-new-claim-oldest-evidence-life
oops,
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/10/news-oldest-stromatolite-fossilized-life-rocks-greenland/
it turns out they're just rocks, which means we suck cocks.
hehe. -
2018-11-23 at 7:49 AM UTCscientists :
niggershumans caused the demised of ancient african megaherbivors.
oh wait, wait.
lol, we're just trolling.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6417/938
scientists : we suck cocks. and enjoyed it. -
2018-11-23 at 4:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny scientists :
niggershumans caused the demised of ancient african megaherbivors.
oh wait, wait.
lol, we're just trolling.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6417/938
scientists : we suck cocks. and enjoyed it.
Viney, how does it feel?