User Controls
The end of days september 2015 Blood moon rising
-
2015-08-19 at 6:05 PM UTC
that's not the real steven hawking, he died along time ago and they just propped some retard in a chair to pronounce 'truths' about the universe.
That's amazing! The same thing happened to the real Spectral. On 08JAN09 Jeff Hunter killed the real Spectral because he was l337 and kept hacking mod accounts. Ever since then Jeff Hunter has been living in a remote cabin in Eastern Pennsylvania preting to be Spectral to avoid being charged with murder. He closed Totse the following day ti create the confusion and distraction necessary to hide his foul deed. -
2015-08-19 at 6:58 PM UTC
That's amazing! The same thing happened to the real Spectral. On 08JAN09 Jeff Hunter killed the real Spectral because he was l337 and kept hacking mod accounts. Ever since then Jeff Hunter has been living in a remote cabin in Eastern Pennsylvania preting to be Spectral to avoid being charged with murder. He closed Totse the following day ti create the confusion and distraction necessary to hide his foul deed.
Not only that, it is rumored that Zok is actually illuminati and that Zoklet was an elaborate psyop to study each and every one of us to better understand elements of dissent within the broader community. -
2015-08-19 at 7:31 PM UTC
Not only that, it is rumored that Zok is actually illuminati and that Zoklet was an elaborate psyop to study each and every one of us to better understand elements of dissent within the broader community.
Zok is half jedi, I'm just sayin'... -
2015-08-19 at 7:46 PM UTC
Zok is half jedi, I'm just sayin'…
-
2015-08-19 at 7:53 PM UTC
-
2015-08-19 at 7:55 PM UTCwould thank, sophist
-
2015-08-19 at 9:29 PM UTC
when I read stuff like this, or the scientists' latest assertions that we are 'in a simulation', the first thing I think of is, maybe god is real.
What the quantum physicists say is completely accurate. We and all which surround us, to the farthest reaches of the cosmos, and right down to the most infinitesimal particle, is all a very clever "matrix", entirely designed by some unknown, and apparently beyond imaginably powerful, super-intelligent being. All of reality as we know it is like waves, like wavelengths, like music, but who is singing this song? Nobody knows but his angelic sons, both good and bad. They know. But we have not yet achieved the knowledge to fully understand what we're looking at and dealing with here. We have strong hints, especially with the rapid pace of today's sciences, but we are still merely looking through a mirror darkly.
-
2015-08-19 at 9:31 PM UTC
What the quantum physicists say is completely accurate.
False. The rest of the statement is to be disregarded.
Quantum Physicists even agree that the work they are doing is theoretical in nature and its complete accuracy isn't guaranteed. I would know. I am a quantum physicist. -
2015-08-19 at 10:06 PM UTC
I am a quantum physicist.
-
2015-08-19 at 11:34 PM UTCI use the term loosely, i havent a phd or any such credentials but I have read enough papers, books and information on the subject to recognize pseudoscience. Not that I dont love me some pseudoscience.
-
2015-08-19 at 11:37 PM UTC
I use the term loosely, i havent a phd or any such credentials but I have read enough papers, books and information on the subject to recognize pseudoscience. Not that I dont love me some pseudoscience.
Oh for a moment there i thought you were someone else. -
2015-08-19 at 11:55 PM UTC
What the quantum physicists say is completely accurate. We and all which surround us, to the farthest reaches of the cosmos, and right down to the most infinitesimal particle, is all a very clever "matrix", entirely designed by some unknown, and apparently beyond imaginably powerful, super-intelligent being. All of reality as we know it is like waves, like wavelengths, like music, but who is singing this song? Nobody knows but his angelic sons, both good and bad. They know. But we have not yet achieved the knowledge to fully understand what we're looking at and dealing with here. We have strong hints, especially with the rapid pace of today's sciences, but we are still merely looking through a mirror darkly.
For a moment there I thought thus post jaf content. -
2015-08-19 at 11:57 PM UTC
What the quantum physicists say is completely accurate. We and all which surround us, to the farthest reaches of the cosmos, and right down to the most infinitesimal particle, is all a very clever "matrix", entirely designed by some unknown, and apparently beyond imaginably powerful, super-intelligent being. All of reality as we know it is like waves, like wavelengths, like music, but who is singing this song? Nobody knows but his angelic sons, both good and bad. They know. But we have not yet achieved the knowledge to fully understand what we're looking at and dealing with here. We have strong hints, especially with the rapid pace of today's sciences, but we are still merely looking through a mirror darkly.
For a moment there I thought this post had content. -
2015-08-19 at 11:58 PM UTCI love me some pseudo-science myself. qi-gong psychosis caused by certain sorts of repeated movement in one's peripheral vision ho!!!!
-
2015-08-20 at 12:16 AM UTC
I love me some pseudo-science myself. qi-gong psychosis caused by certain sorts of repeated movement in one's peripheral vision ho!!!!
Pseudoscience you say? Don't mind if i do, i'm gonna' make it as incomprehensible as possible. Here goes.
In the rudimantery stages of neuro-psycho-physiologic research it was often percieved that topometric techniques would be inadequate in the divining the finer workings of metasocial behavior. Indeed several case studies that were properly adjusted for factors of in-group bias revealed that the motion of social currents seemed to be influenced by episodes of pro-social behaviors or conflict rather than any underlying neurological factors. This begs the question of whether reciprocal altruism is a pro-social behavior in the sense that it is a learned 'skill' or whether genetic factors come into play. To conclude, it is fair to say that a multidisciplinary approach would be best suited in answering these questions and any to come in light of future research into the subject at hand.
Logical inconsistencies: 0
Technical jargon: 9001
Actual science: 0 -
2015-08-20 at 1:24 AM UTCmisspellings: 2
-
2015-08-20 at 2:05 AM UTC
misspellings: 2
Sorry, as you know English is not my native language, also when it comes to capitalizing the 'i', NEVER! It's not a name, and i'll burn before i capitalize it. -
2015-08-20 at 2:13 AM UTCI always misspell perceived too. I used to misspell misspell. I always thought it was mispell.
This is the most interesting post I have ever made -
2015-08-20 at 2:18 AM UTC
I always misspell perceived too. I used to misspell misspell. I always thought it was mispell.
This is the most interesting post I have ever made
It doesn't help that in Dutch you pronounce 'ie' as e and 'ei' as i.
-
2015-08-20 at 2:35 AM UTC
I use the term loosely, i havent a phd or any such credentials but I have read enough papers, books and information on the subject to recognize pseudoscience. Not that I dont love me some pseudoscience.
Being a Wikipedia scientist does not give you the right to call yourself a quantum physicist. Get your head out your ass.
