User Controls
Happy 9/11!!!
-
2018-09-11 at 9:52 PM UTCSophia I recall you mocking me for 9/11 remarks yet I don't think 9/11 was a false flag to just go to war with a nation we didn't like but rather to cash in
Clearly MIC controlling DoD decisions.
Suddam Hussain was a dick. He would fuck with the US, violate the No Fly, go after American Fighters and play mind games.. pushing the limit. So it wouldn't of been illegal to had him removed even by assasination. but to kill his sons may have pushed the limits?
And Osama Bin Laden was not (At the time) on the FBI interest in 9/11. then we find out that a relative of his writes checks to some of the highjackers, paying for their housing in San Diego and out in Florida.
friends of Bush. Bush's cousin ran Security for the WTC contracted.
Dick Cheney gets a contract deal for his former company Halliburton (Which he owns stocks in) to be the contractors to fix shit. And Halliburton is a great company. the guys who work there are hard working guys. but this was a very evil thing to do. it's management. it's people from different countries who were leaders (Making it a multinational crime)
It's not the jedis or "Israel". It's not Muslims. It's not christians. it's all of the above, yet they don't represent their religion by doing so. they just claim to be of these religions.
It may of consisted of people in the know of a hundred or so. not thousands. and everyone else was somewhat in the sub-knowledge (Need to know basis, ask no questions, sign an NDA)
and that's it. and if you say No one could hold a secret" you're right. People have talked. but no one at the top. "I am responsible for treason of 9/11 and killing half a million Iraqi soldiers and civilians and allowing 8 thousand US soldiers and thousands of allies to die). I don't think that group is going to leak info. Kerry wasn't going to talk about Skull and Bone that he was a frat brother to that of George W Bush.. but he sure in the hell bashed on Georges character. So don't say "No one can keep a secret" when it comes to something that could have them publicly executed. -
2018-09-11 at 9:54 PM UTCNever made fun of you over 9/11 truth.
-
2018-09-11 at 9:58 PM UTCa shitload of people did. does this website mirror like a netsplit?
go-between - Lan0y prolly knows -
2018-09-11 at 10:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by totse3.com a shitload of people did. does this website mirror like a netsplit?
go-between - Lan0y prolly knows
IDK, but there's probably a backup somewhere but it's not like you can be on mirror 1 and be talking to mirror 1 people while mirror 2 people are oblivious. We don't have that kind of set up.
Interestingly at some point Masterchan did, but they would synch up. -
2018-09-11 at 10:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie IDK, but there's probably a backup somewhere but it's not like you can be on mirror 1 and be talking to mirror 1 people while mirror 2 people are oblivious. We don't have that kind of set up.
Interestingly at some point Masterchan did, but they would synch up.
Well My appologies then.
it would be awesome to dsk-top photo both the real and go-between and post them.
and I know Lanmy's board did this before. as a joke or whatever.. long ago around the time I first joined. -
2018-09-11 at 10:08 PM UTCHurricane Erin September 11th 2001 broke up suddenly and shot off the coast of NY back out into the Atlantic
Hurricane Florence September 11th 2018 is about to hit landfall.. or will it?
should we be watching for planes right now? -
2018-09-11 at 10:26 PM UTCThere's a lot of money to be made on 9/11 "truth", as the conspiracy throries inevitably go down a deeper rabbit hole that ultimately ends up with some secret religious group or circle of wealthy families that is the source of all evil being the bad actor;
And pls watch all my videos about said bad actorr !!
The idea that that the gov't would go to such elaborate, intricated plots to bomb or cgi planes and lie to the atc's via radio, radar and whatever is ludicrous.
Listen to the logs and tell me they were made up.
You know how to make a plane crashing into a building look like a plane crashing into a building?
You fly an actual plane into a building, which, coincidentally, is the easiest, cheapest, and most effective way to make it appear as if a plane crashed into a building.
The argument that "oh yaa, to go teh war for teh monieezz and teh oill" is ridiculous to me. -
2018-09-12 at 12:02 AM UTCPhysical truths can't melt dank memes!
-
2018-09-12 at 12:07 AM UTC
-
2018-09-12 at 12:10 AM UTC
-
2018-09-12 at 12:13 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-09-12 at 12:15 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-09-12 at 12:38 AM UTC
-
2018-09-12 at 1:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Mad Matt IDIOTS!!!
LOL
Very scientific
Yes, It can soften and weaken it. so truss will collapse. but they won't rip the exterior wall out that's like an outer mesh.. a bugscreen. punch holes in it, the entire thing isn't going to unravel and come apart.
the designer noted that having a straw stand straight up and then push down on it, will buckle it and collapse (using the force of his hand which is 100 times the strenth of the straw.
now cut that straw into sections and glue them back together.. that same force and even extra applied can not collapse the straw. now take that straw and 46 others and create an x;y to the z form and glue them all together to create a collumn box of straws. the guy could pretty much lean his entire body weight on it. that is what box columns are. welded x;y and z axis form. The 3D dynamic video of PBS is a joke. try getting a real 3D software like Autodesk VIZ and utilize the axis form dynamic after you bone and rig a mesh model. nothing is moving unless you manipulate it. it mirrors the real world which is why it's trusted to build and design large steal structures.
they're not moving sideways, upwards, downwards nor angular. now surround it with several feet of concrete. the floors only had 4 inches of concrete. so they snapped easily if completely collapsed inward. But each floor going lower and lower is thicker and wider. this resistance should of stopped a major catastrophic collapse of a weaken upper floor, even if it did make sense to fall. it would of slowed down and braked like a maglift brake works (emergency elevator style brake)
this building makes zero fucking sense to completely collapse. it could collapsed a few floors like in an Earthquake were the shaking breaks apart reinforced rebar on several floors but all it would do is sandwich the fall. that'gos it.
and building 7? fuck off with any BS logic. if it collapsed then it should of fell sideways and asymmetrical. -
2018-09-12 at 1:14 AM UTCGOOBER NOSE THE KNOWS
Dooot doot de la loot -
2018-09-12 at 2:20 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Come on Lonnie. Do you not even question the official narrative a little?
I'm happy to question any narrative, be it official or not. In particular I find the "pour so much time into finding arbitrary things that point to conspiracy that it takes a correspondingly monumental amount of time to debunk" style narratives and the "meme based argument" class of narratives the most questionable of all.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracies was my bread and butter for years, a few people I lived with were totally convinced of literally anything that contradicted the "official narrative", including many mutually contradictory conspiracy theories. My favorite flavor was the one where someone would make up some story that was supposed to be part of the "official narrative" and then refute it. I remember once being told 9/11 was a coverup because the official story was that the hijackers were identified by their passports fell out of the planes during collision and that's obviously impossible.
I'm just 100% done with taking it seriously. At least the proof-by-meme strategy can be amusing.
Originally posted by DietPiano You have been avoiding me.
Are you gag ordered?
Bark once for no.
I understand in either case
Let us be fuck
Satiate me curiosity
No, I just don't want to TSTM accounts anymore and any discussion of it ends with people hounding me about it. I regret making the feature, in retrospect I realize it's just an invitation to either abuse it periodically or generate more work for me with minimal benefit.
-
2018-09-12 at 2:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I remember once being told 9/11 was a coverup because the official story was that the hijackers were identified by their passports fell out of the planes during collision and that's obviously impossible.
That one passport was found on the street beside the WTC is part of the official narrative.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satam_al-Suqami#Passport_discovery
And 911 was a coverup - everybody realises that - the only question is what was being covered up. -
2018-09-12 at 3:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I'm happy to question any narrative, be it official or not. In particular I find the "pour so much time into finding arbitrary things that point to conspiracy that it takes a correspondingly monumental amount of time to debunk" style narratives and the "meme based argument" class of narratives the most questionable of all.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracies was my bread and butter for years, a few people I lived with were totally convinced of literally anything that contradicted the "official narrative", including many mutually contradictory conspiracy theories. My favorite flavor was the one where someone would make up some story that was supposed to be part of the "official narrative" and then refute it. I remember once being told 9/11 was a coverup because the official story was that the hijackers were identified by their passports fell out of the planes during collision and that's obviously impossible.
I'm just 100% done with taking it seriously. At least the proof-by-meme strategy can be amusing.
ha, I think my personal favorite is "the planes were holograms" followed closely by "the towers were shot with directed energy weapons"No, I just don't want to TSTM accounts anymore and any discussion of it ends with people hounding me about it. I regret making the feature, in retrospect I realize it's just an invitation to either abuse it periodically or generate more work for me with minimal benefit.
Translation: Assume a third party has access to the database, which you all should've been doing anyway -
2018-09-12 at 3:49 AM UTC
-
2018-09-12 at 3:56 AM UTCi knew a retard was going to make this predictable thread
