User Controls
WTC an Inside job?
-
2018-07-05 at 12:49 PM UTCEverything will be exposed and the truth will all come out after the perpetrators are already dead. The truth never comes out while the perps are still alive.
-
2018-07-06 at 4:27 AM UTC
-
2018-07-06 at 4:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Everything will be exposed and the truth will all come out after the perpetrators are already dead. The truth never comes out while the perps are still alive.
No.. this is unacceptable. we need to act now. they're not above the law. and they're one foot in the grave with age issues -
2018-07-30 at 2:05 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-07-31 at 11:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/index.php
thanks. this might come in handy if I chose to make a documentary or just research. -
2018-08-02 at 9:22 PM UTC
-
2018-08-14 at 6:16 PM UTC
-
2018-08-14 at 7:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover
These people are so stupid and dense that no amount of clear evidence would ever convince them. Their shallow brains have been bombarded with clever propaganda, and they are now truly incapable of thinking anything but what they've been programmed to believe. There's no hope for them! And there is a lot of them out there. -
2018-08-24 at 5:29 PM UTCAnd they called it "ground zero".
-
2018-08-24 at 9:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover
the PBS video proving why the buildings fell actually does more harm in trying to defend that using trusses instead of welded cross beams.. because welded cross beams would of made sense ripping that building to shreds (WTC 1 AND 2) like it did. but by have trusses only bolted to weld mounts and only 4 inches of concrete wouldn't have ripped the out wall welded together of h-beams. and even if it did, it would of only been the top portion to do so. not keep pancaking in on itself. then take down 47 box columns with reinforce cased concrete with it. and the beams got thicker and wider towards the bottom. the load was also built 5 times it's suggested weight capability which was not over loaded.. meaning it had 5 times redundancy.
and the entire building was pushing outward in all 4 directions like a banana peeling. taking the majority of what weight did exist off of the collapsing itself. so why didn't it slow to a stop? what made it keep going. hurrr... make some more shit up NIST>The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-09-04 at 7:41 PM UTC
-
2018-09-04 at 10:52 PM UTCThe Pentagon is enough proof right there to establish the whole thing was a setup, because the wings of the plane would have exploded across both sides of the hole for 50 feet, but pics show unbroken windows and unburnt brick on both sides. That is physically impossible. So we know for 100% fact it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon. Most likely a missile fired from a USAF jet or a drone sent in by the government.
-
2018-09-04 at 11:22 PM UTCSo there is a rescue boat video taping the WTC area from the East River.
The guy's phone keeps ringing. Then someone yells "Cow or Coach, Don't tell them" (that's what I hear.)
The phone rings like 3-4 times. I see clearly a sun flare from the camera, yet the sun is above the building. and it to me looks like it's mid afternoon in September? I mean I know the sun is south around 10am but this is more hanging over New Jersey. And I know the island is angled. but it angles more to the east. the last building drops just at 10 or so. I have been told by some guys that kind of mock 9/11 truthers but once in a while go with it.. said this about the boat video of WTC. the phone was setting off chargers when it rang. and it drops the last ring. and the sun flare moves around with the camera but I see flashes of white on the building windows. and this side of the building fell about 3 or 4 seconds after the other side fell.. both side opposite of each other fell slightly different times. making it like a 45 degree slant collapse. and everything is getting blown out and away like a banana peeling.
But I think these guys might of been Coast Guard or Fire and Rescue. yet there is corruption everywhere. Regardless of this "Brotherhood/Sisterhood" bond in agencies of all types. there is evil people everywhere.
I don't want to offend a hero but I'm just seeing what those guys said.
And Rudy Dent, and I have spoke many times. I had told him about what I experienced. He told me his Battalion Chief told him not to go down into a garage where people were screaming until FEMA showed up. he said when they showed up, the screaming stopped. he found a few people but knows others found dead were still alive for the 2 hours he waited.
I say break protocol. but that could cost him his retirement -
2018-09-04 at 11:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The Pentagon is enough proof right there to establish the whole thing was a setup, because the wings of the plane would have exploded across both sides of the hole for 50 feet, but pics show unbroken windows and unburnt brick on both sides. That is physically impossible. So we know for 100% fact it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon. Most likely a missile fired from a USAF jet or a drone sent in by the government.
I been paying special attention to your posts the last couple of days.
How can you you tolerate being around yourself?
Conspiracyphobes! Give this fake shite a rest. -
2018-09-04 at 11:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The Pentagon is enough proof right there to establish the whole thing was a setup, because the wings of the plane would have exploded across both sides of the hole for 50 feet, but pics show unbroken windows and unburnt brick on both sides. That is physically impossible. So we know for 100% fact it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon. Most likely a missile fired from a USAF jet or a drone sent in by the government.
I still think it was a modified military grade 757 or 767 that slammed into it. Something with a much harder composite material than commercial (which need it for weight reduction while Military needs it as protective housing)
so people who have access to Military Planes and set up remote access to the control panels. just program it right in, shuts everyone out. Pretty much just like the X-file Spinoff.. they created shit for predictive programming or the writers just read Project Northwood and knew of the 1980s software that could direct planes. like the crash test. in order to see what the inside of a plane looks like when it explodes to create better security and fire resistent materials?
One person does good and one person uses it for bad.
And there is around 100 billion dollars missing in the 1985 trade deal between Saudi Arabia with Great Britian selling it to them (That is why I posted the "Deal of the Century" poster in the other thread) go watch the movie.. it's got Chevy Chase, Gregory Hines, and Sigourney Weaver.
came out in like 1982. before the shit actually happens.
If you're curious where they may have been able to get 757 type planes? The Bone Yard.
https://airplaneboneyards.com/davis-monthan-afb-amarg-airplane-boneyard.htm -
2018-09-04 at 11:36 PM UTC
-
2018-09-04 at 11:41 PM UTCI was looking for a 757 but saw this.. of course they rename the models because they're a "varient" which means more powerful engines and thicker cockpit housing.
This might anger someone there because it would of happen under their nose? perhaps guys in military suits not even in the Military with perfect badges forged to get in, and strip for "Parts
something like this
U.S. Air Force C-22A Transport, S/N 84-0193 ... variant of the Boeing 727 ... parked on Celebrity Row at AMARG -
2018-09-05 at 12:06 AM UTCI'm suprized someone hasn't done a scaled down model of a plane crashing into a tower.
Live or simulated.
Computers are very powerful. -
2018-09-05 at 12:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover I'm suprized someone hasn't done a scaled down model of a plane crashing into a tower.
Live or simulated.
Computers are very powerful.
There is talk of building one that is about 20 stories in height but 110 floors. and using like a 1/5 scale plane?
problem is that Material like steal has fissures and flaws here and there. so a smaller version has to have a material that is then scaled down in strength?
and then there is gravity. it just wouldn't prove shit that way. it is better with computers if someone could be honest and very advanced about it. Computers are way faster today and the science I'm sure is a bit better. people must of learned some shit from the data. -
2018-09-05 at 12:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by totse3.com I still think it was a modified military grade 757 or 767 that slammed into it….
Impossible, because the evidence completely discounts that theory. The fuel is in the wings. That's where most of the heat of the explosion will come from, and yet both sides of the hole plainly show unbroken windows and unburned walls. That couldn't have happened if it was an airliner. The fuel and aluminum in the wings would have ripped through those walls and windows like paper and left everything black as coal. Call up any pictures of the hole on Google and you can confirm all of this for yourself. Definitely a narrow-bodied projectile, a drone, missile, but certainly not a passenger plane.
