User Controls
Miss Sophie finds dhers to be quite dopey...
-
2018-07-25 at 8 PM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman So those who are attracted to other forms of aesthetics, are a "deviation" of what we consider natural.
A 4 year old girl is not a form of aesthetics...she's a helpless child with limited means to protect herself or full understanding of how evil people can be. A ghetto kid always living in violence and crime may understand a bit better...yet in almost all cases they have no ability to fend off attackers or powers to defend. Pedos are devient and absolutely nothing natural about them. When tested almost all are mentally ill and when truth is revealed you see how insane they really are. Their level of attraction goes way beyond just lust being obsessive and why there's no treatment. Why kids have to be protected and these creeps have to be caught. -
2018-07-25 at 8:02 PM UTC
-
2018-07-25 at 8:03 PM UTCThe author of this post has returned to nothingness
-
2018-07-25 at 8:03 PM UTCFfs Joe. I thought you said "enough said".
I am not speaking about a child but grown ass women, like myself.I was ref to this, for example.
"Men see a big booty and nice curvy body and think Mmmmmmm…that's the conscious part that is told by instinct and the subconscious…wide child bearing hips - CHECK, big full breasts to feed the kids - Check, nice layer of fat so she's strong and well fed which suggests her kids will be too - CHECK..etc."
You are attracted to the opposite. Let's say to an androgynous type of woman. No big breast to remind you the feed of the kids. No big booty etc.
Can you move on now and quit quoting my comments, which have nothing to do with what you are talking about?! Geezers. -
2018-07-25 at 8:04 PM UTC
-
2018-07-25 at 8:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman I was ref to this, for example.
"Men see a big booty and nice curvy body and think Mmmmmmm…that's the conscious part that is told by instinct and the subconscious…wide child bearing hips - CHECK, big full breasts to feed the kids - Check, nice layer of fat so she's strong and well fed which suggests her kids will be too - CHECK..etc."
You are attracted to the opposite. Let's say to an androgynous type of woman. No big breast to remind you the feed of the kids. No big booty etc.
its futile to talk about natural evolutionary traits.
we had been living unnaturally for the past 200 years, and even more so with the advent of internal combustion engines powered by fossil fuels.
naturally evolved humans could never achieve and live in the kind of population density we have today.
we are the products of unnatural evolutionary biology caused by the unnatural surrounding that we thrive in. we should be exped to live and thrive normally as nature intended.
nature had never intended to have 7.3billion of us inside her. -
2018-07-25 at 8:05 PM UTC
-
2018-07-25 at 8:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman Ffs Joe. I thought you said "enough said".
I am not speaking about a child but grown ass women, like myself. Can you move on now and quit posting my comments, which have nothing to do with what you are talking about?! Geezers.
Enough said as you make no sense...deal with it. -
2018-07-25 at 8:06 PM UTCThe author of this post has returned to nothingness
-
2018-07-25 at 8:06 PM UTCFuck you boo!
😢 -
2018-07-25 at 8:07 PM UTCFecking idiot. lol
-
2018-07-25 at 8:07 PM UTC
-
2018-07-25 at 8:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Red_Woman You may see them as a taboo of our society, and they may very well be. But there are good reasons for it. They are made to protect those who can't protect themselves. Call it "victims" or not, it doesn't change the essence of it.
this is not true.
take that case in the US where a mother put her child in the washing machine and her baby died as a result of her negligence.
on countries with a sane and ''normal'', sensible laws, she would be guilty of negligence.
but in the US of A, she managed to sue and won her court case becos the judge and the juries believe she was the VICTIM instead of the perpetrator that she really was.
its always the society that arbitrarily determines who is and is not a victim. -
2018-07-25 at 8:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader we had been living unnaturally for the past 200 years, and even more so with the advent of internal combustion engines powered by fossil fuels.
naturally evolved humans could never achieve and live in the kind of population density we have today.we should be exped to live and thrive normally as nature intended.
Isn't this a contradiction though? -
2018-07-25 at 8:12 PM UTCThe author of this post has returned to nothingness
-
2018-07-25 at 8:14 PM UTCnat·u·ral
ˈnaCH(ə)rəl/
adjective
adjective: natural
1.
existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind.
Humankind IS part of nature...even the dictionary doesn't get it... -
2018-07-25 at 8:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by apt You're always trying to write authoritatively on things you obviously know nothing about. Doesn't take an expert to observe and point that out.
Well actually it does, you not being one wouldn't understand that though..lololol
You didn't even read what I "comedically" said...the environments were not the same...they were 2 separate worlds with separate gene pools...2 separate worlds with separate gene pools would not result in the same results...That's demonstrated by isolated islands on Earth that had/have unique flora and fauna.
You're dismissed. -
2018-07-25 at 8:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader on countries with a sane and ''normal'', sensible laws, she would be guilty of negligence.
Exactly.its always the society that arbitrarily determines who is and is not a victim.
True, although I would say part of society. As you said, I reckon the majority would find that decision bonkers. There is the common sense, although it might not change the decision in this case.
There are people who have committed crimes, and got away with it in court. It doesn't make them less criminal in my opinion. -
2018-07-25 at 8:17 PM UTC
-
2018-07-25 at 8:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader its futile to talk about natural evolutionary traits.
we had been living unnaturally for the past 200 years, and even more so with the advent of internal combustion engines powered by fossil fuels.
naturally evolved humans could never achieve and live in the kind of population density we have today.
we are the products of unnatural evolutionary biology caused by the unnatural surrounding that we thrive in. we should be exped to live and thrive normally as nature intended.
nature had never intended to have 7.3billion of us inside her.
Wrong again....only misfits, psychopaths, addicts, criminals or psychologically unbalanced individuals live unnatural lives...ones who are inferior or not genetically sound. Mostly due to the way they are brought up or how they react to their environment. Population density has little to do with pedophilia...it only may increase the numbers. There are millions in poor dense areas that are not as sick as you and have no need to depend on helpless children for pleasure. This is part of a sick mind and your lifestyle with no attachment to normal people.
