2018-06-11 at 8:10 AM UTC
Ensign Galm
African Astronaut
[specifically erupt this tetrachloromethane]
On site would be cool too. One for pm, one for public. Maybe with a whitelist and a show button.
If the feds get my IP they'll know I smok3 beer
2018-06-11 at 8:16 AM UTC
Sure, might as well have option for posts too. Yes, having a way to view the image once you see the message/post is a good idea - instead of having to click the link and seeing in a new tab.
The current phrasing for the check-boxes is "Enable images embedded in posts:" and "Enable videos embedded in posts:" but in practice it actually toggles it in posts and in PMs.
2018-06-11 at 11:38 AM UTC
Dis nigga getting burnished. Just turn off java all together
2018-06-11 at 1:20 PM UTC
cupocheer
Space Nigga
[unwillingly condescend the dp]
The Russians and "bit" swappers use Java.
2018-06-11 at 1:40 PM UTC
Fucking burnish he's pure evil i tell ya
2018-06-11 at 1:54 PM UTC
I say let Burnish rattox people and if they fall they fall.
That's space anarchy man
2018-06-14 at 5:09 AM UTC
I think this one has been suggested before. It's a good idea, I just don't have the time to implement it at the moment.
As for loading images in-page when clicked, I doubt it will ever get implemented. The straightforward way to do it would be via javascript and I don't the the JS on/images off demographic is large enough to justify it (or exists at all). I can think of one way to possibly do it via some high level CSS wankery involving the beloved background image on a block element in place of a real image hack that's popular these days (we use it here for SVGs) but I don't think I could guarantee the preloading behavior which is kind of the point to start with.
