User Controls
WTC an Inside job?
-
2018-06-06 at 8:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover Hahaha.
And the very one doesn't even show the plane actually hitting anything.
Conveniently hidden behind WW1.
The second one is a mile away.
The third one doesn't show it actually hitting the tower either. It's hidden. AGAIN.
Thanks for proving my point.
The Wile E Coyote "aluminum" plane goes right through the steel building.
And the other 16?
lolololol Fucking nut. -
2018-06-06 at 8:47 PM UTC
-
2018-06-06 at 11:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover The other 15 show the Wile E Coyote "aluminum" plane going right through the steel building.
And some with the nose coming out the other side. Intact.
Did you even watch it?
Fucking moron.
OK I have to explain this to you. It's called video ghosting.
The older high definition prior to blue ray video (99.5% raw format) had CoDec (Compression Decompression)
this means that little grids of video are created and stitched together using interlace interpolation
that means that some of the grids stop moving (if nothing moves significantly in the video) to help reduce bandwidth. the video interpolation was seeing the plan moving and often fast objects will continue running where they're not supposed to in the one grid region on the video. there was some slight motion of panning from the helicopter taking the video.
it's basically a processor glitch. -
2018-06-07 at 12:13 AM UTCThe Pentagon was hit with a USAF missile. That section of the structure had been heavily reinforced just weeks earlier.
-
2018-06-07 at 11:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson uh huh.
You guys should listen to some of the vocal reactions on this video.
Some seem faked.
And why does the plane appear black in some and silver in others?
In number seven the guy doesn't even hear the plane. He only looks up AFTER the impact.
In Number 14 it looks like the plane changes color.
-
2018-06-07 at 11:50 AM UTC
-
2018-06-07 at 12:36 PM UTCThe plane that "crashed" in the field never existed either. No wreckage, just a big black, burn mark. Most likely another missile fired from a USAF jet that went off course and hit there.
-
2018-06-07 at 7:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The plane that "crashed" in the field never existed either. No wreckage, just a big black, burn mark. Most likely another missile fired from a USAF jet that went off course and hit there.
when a plane hit the surface at hundreds of miles an hour, it breaks into a billion pieces of debris. -
2018-06-07 at 7:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader when a plane hit the surface at hundreds of miles an hour, it breaks into a billion pieces of debris.
Not a scrap of United Airlines Flight 93 was ever recovered. No landing gear, no engine parts, no body shell, no glass, no seats, no bodies, just a big black smudge. Pics readily available on Google confirm this fact. -
2018-06-07 at 7:59 PM UTC
-
2018-06-07 at 8:45 PM UTCSupposedly parts were found scattered throughout a five mile area.
Shot down. -
2018-06-07 at 8:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The plane that "crashed" in the field never existed either. No wreckage, just a big black, burn mark. Most likely another missile fired from a USAF jet that went off course and hit there.
a Farmer said he heard a thump sound (pulse) which caused his power to go out. EMP
before he heard the crash. that's what happens they say when they want to knock out power before downing another fighter jet.
Most likely it was a modified 757 or 7x7 model and was headed towards the white house, things were too hot and too late so Cheney then ordered it shot down. In which he denied at first. then admitted it 8 years later in 2009.
apparently there is truth about pieces of it over a several mile distant before the main craft hit that ground. they did pull some stuff out. -
2018-06-07 at 8:56 PM UTC
-
2018-06-07 at 9:07 PM UTC
-
2018-06-07 at 9:14 PM UTCnumber 8
4:06
that is not a United nor American Airlines.
I see these planes daily on some weeks. it just looked like a grayish dark plane with possibly a fake emblem on the tail. the real planes are shiny as fuck. this is taken on a very sunny day. but early in the morning late summer. the shadow wouldn't cause the underbelly to be black like that. it's not a fake plane but a fake commercial plane. -
2018-06-07 at 9:23 PM UTC
-
2018-06-07 at 9:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by Rock_N_Rollover If you like to read, read this.
https://archive.org/stream/truestoryofbilde00dani#page/n1/mode/1up
what r u ???
12 ??? 13 ???
this isnt 1995. -
2018-06-07 at 9:31 PM UTC
-
2018-06-07 at 9:32 PM UTC
-
2018-06-08 at 12:43 AM UTCParts of the landing gear assembly and main engines, bits of the fuselage, always survives, no matter how horrific the crash, but in this case NOTHING. Not a shred of anything showing in any of the pics.