User Controls
Russia bans pornhub & youporn.
-
2016-09-19 at 12:03 AM UTC
Ok. But you haven't convinced me, or as far as I can tell anyone else, why should we accept that as true?
Of course I havent convinced you or anyone else here. They love to fap. I dont think my opinion is going to change your opinion and I dont give a hecc if you accept it as true or not because regardless of if you accept it or dont its still true.
Its like math. 2 + 2 = 4 in any reasonable system, but now common core maths comes in and says "well it could be whatever you want it to be!", but to any real student of math thats not how it fucking is because 2 + 2 = fucking 4 you cunt. -
2016-09-19 at 12:06 AM UTCI don't think sex is like math. If it were, you could objectively prove your view is the correct view.
-
2016-09-19 at 12:11 AM UTC
I don't think sex is like math.
Thats where you are wrong kiddo. by adding penis to vagina you make person. If thats not maths to you then u r retardeded. -
2016-09-19 at 12:16 AM UTC
Thats where you are wrong kiddo. by adding penis to vagina you make person. If thats not maths to you then u r retardeded.
Sex doesn't always create offspring. Even when it does, why is that divine and why does the sex have to be limited to 1 penis and 1 vagina? -
2016-09-19 at 12:28 AM UTC
Sex doesn't always create offspring. Even when it does, why is that divine and why does the sex have to be limited to 1 penis and 1 vagina?
open your fucking mind you moron. Why is it not divine? Until you can convince me that two biological units coming together and creating another is not divine im done with your questions. And in regards to the 1 penis 1 vagina question sex is pretty fucking limited to 1 penis and 1 vagina unless you have a cunt so stretched out it can take two penises. Regardless of that little fact no matter how many mens sperm you pump into your sluthole only one will make it to the egg. And if one penis if fucking three vaginas he cant get his sperm in all of them in a way as to procreate. So its pretty fucking pointless to add more penises and vaginas to the mix. -
2016-09-19 at 12:34 AM UTCSo your whole thesis is bible said so?
-
2016-09-19 at 12:34 AM UTCGuess the Romans didn't think it was pointless when they were having giant orgies while building the greatest empire in history. Also if sex between 2 people is truly divine you should be able to do some math and prove that. I'll be here when you're ready to back that up with something more substantial than verbal diarrhea.
-
2016-09-19 at 12:40 AM UTC
So your whole thesis is bible said so?
I never once said that.
@OpenYourMind
You know when the romans were doing the orgies and stuff their empire was falling? Have you even read the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire? In any case the romans participated in orgies and shit as a way to get their minds off the fact that their empire was failing and being overrun with germanics. And since your point that sex is not divine is backed up with no proof there is no reason for me to explain why it is since I told you that if you could prove that sex wasnt divine (which you cant) then I would tell you why I believe it is. So essentially maybe I am spouting verbal diarrhea but you are too since you cant disprove its divinity. -
2016-09-19 at 12:42 AM UTC
Because I know in my heart of hearts it is the way.
Just like you know God is real right? Then you go on to say:
[greentext]>Of course I havent convinced you or anyone else here. They love to fap[/greentext]
This is like saying "Sophie doesn't believe in God because he loves atheism." -
2016-09-19 at 12:45 AM UTC
[greentext]>Of course I havent convinced you or anyone else here. They love to fap[/greentext]
This is like saying "Sophie doesn't believe in God because he loves atheism."
Yes. It is an obvious thing that seems to pass over your heads. I am not here to prove anything to you guys. I am just saying what I believe and I have like 4 different people freaking out on me because I hold the belief that porn is degenerate bullshit and that actual sex is a divine act. Literally fucking flipping their shit because I feel this way. All the while they cant even explain why they feel how they do nor can they disprove my claims.
Top fucking kek you porncuccs -
2016-09-19 at 12:48 AM UTC
I never once said that.
@OpenYourMind
You know when the romans were doing the orgies and stuff their empire was falling? Have you even read the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire? In any case the romans participated in orgies and shit as a way to get their minds off the fact that their empire was failing and being overrun with germanics. And since your point that sex is not divine is backed up with no proof there is no reason for me to explain why it is since I told you that if you could prove that sex wasnt divine (which you cant) then I would tell you why I believe it is. So essentially maybe I am spouting verbal diarrhea but you are too since you cant disprove its divinity.
To be honest I don't know anything about the Romans. I never claimed sex between two people isn't divine. I don't even really know what you mean by that. I just want you to explain your reasoning. I'm personally not into having sex with more than one person at a time, but I also don't see why people shouldn't do that. I want to know why you think people shouldn't do that. If you can't or won't explain why you believe that beyond "it's what I believe in my heart" I don't see any reason to continue this conversation. -
2016-09-19 at 12:48 AM UTCSo when you say divine, which magic deity are you referring too?
And I'm sure the Huns,Vandals, Goths, etc, failing economy, over expansion and military. Had nothing to do with it. -
2016-09-19 at 12:53 AM UTC
So when you say divine, which magic deity are you referring too?
divinity =/= dietyTo be honest I don't know anything about the Romans. I never claimed sex between two people isn't divine. I don't even really know what you mean by that. I just want you to explain your reasoning. I'm personally not into having sex with more than one person at a time, but I also don't see why people shouldn't do that. I want to know why you think people shouldn't do that. If you can't or won't explain why you believe that beyond "it's what I believe in my heart" I don't see any reason to continue this conversation.
[greentext]>Uses the romans as citation for wild orgies and sexual immorality[/greentext]
[greentext]>To be honest I don't know anything about the Romans.[/greentext]
I didnt see any reason to continue this conversation from my first post. But I am still here. And you are still mad. And still stupid. And still closed minded. Because you are a cuck. -
2016-09-19 at 12:57 AM UTC
You know when the romans were doing the orgies and stuff their empire was falling? Have you even read the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire?
Here you go again correlating things that don't have to do anything with eachother.In any case
'In any case' means if i am wrong here is my backup position, you are wrong let's see your backup position.the romans participated in orgies and shit as a way to get their minds off the fact that their empire was failing
This is an assumption. I am pretty sure the Roman nobility was more concerned with debasing Rome's currency to pay the legions at the point of the fall of Rome. My point here is, they might have had orgies because it felt good, but they were concerned with different things than the overall welfare of the empire.To look at the mentality of the Roman emperors, we can look just at the advice that the Emperor Septimius Severus gave to his two sons, Caracalla and Geta. This is supposed to be his final words to his heirs. He said, "live in harmony; enrich the troops; ignore everyone else." Now, there is a monetary policy to be marveled at!
Caracalla did not adhere to the first part of that advice; in fact, one of his first acts was to murder his brother. But as for enriching the troops, he took that so seriously to heart that his mother remonstrated with him and urged him to be more moderate and to restrain his increasing military expenditures and burdensome new taxes. He responded by saying there was no longer any revenue, just or unjust, to be found. But not to worry, "for as long as we have this," he insisted, pointing to his sword, "we shall not run short of money." His sense of priorities was made more explicit when he remarked, "nobody should have any money but I, so that I may bestow it upon the soldiers." And he was as good as his word. He raised the pay of the soldiers by 50 percent, and to achieve this he doubled the inheritance taxes paid by Roman citizens. When this was not sufficient to meet his needs, he admitted almost every inhabitant of the empire to Roman citizenship. What had formerly been a privilege now became simply a means of expanding the tax base.
He then went further by proceeding to debase the coinage. The basic coinage of the Roman Empire to this time — we're speaking now about 211 AD — was the silver denarius introduced by Augustus at about 95 percent silver at the end of the 1st century BC. The denarius continued for the better part of two centuries as the basic medium of exchange in the empire.
https://mises.org/library/inflation-...l-roman-empire
Boom, inflation and immigration as main causes for Rome's downfall. Sounds familiar?And since your point that sex is not divine
He asked why, questioning why something is so does not mean you believe it is not so.is backed up with no proof
Just like your claim that it is divine is backed up with no proof.there is no reason for me to explain why it is since I told you that if you could prove that sex wasnt divine (which you cant) then I would tell you why I believe it is.
This argument is ridiculous for reasons above.So essentially maybe I am spouting verbal diarrhea but you are too since you cant disprove its divinity.
Ok fine so let's ignore the "sex is divine" issue and let's see you answer the rest of my arguments. -
2016-09-19 at 12:58 AM UTCYou're still here, standing on your soapbox shouting into the wind.
-
2016-09-19 at 12:59 AM UTC"You're close minded"
"Sex involving more than 2 people is unhealthy" -
2016-09-19 at 1:02 AM UTCYou guys seriously think its okay to have sex?
-
2016-09-19 at 1:03 AM UTCLike seriously you believe that?
-
2016-09-19 at 1:04 AM UTCSex isn't just ok, it's divine.
-
2016-09-19 at 1:05 AM UTC
Here you go again correlating things that don't have to do anything with eachother.
'In any case' means if i am wrong here is my backup position, you are wrong let's see your backup position.
This is an assumption. I am pretty sure the Roman nobility was more concerned with debasing Rome's currency to pay the legions at the point of the fall of Rome. My point here is, they might have had orgies because it felt good, but they were concerned with different things than the overall welfare of the empire.
https://mises.org/library/inflation-...l-roman-empire
Boom, inflation and immigration as main causes for Rome's downfall. Sounds familiar?
He asked why, questioning why something is so does not mean you believe it is not so.
Just like your claim that it is divine is backed up with no proof.
This argument is ridiculous for reasons above.
Ok fine so let's ignore the "sex is divine" issue and let's see you answer the rest of my arguments.
No source so none of what you wrote has any merit.
