User Controls

-SpectraL is a phony: definitive proof. Link him to this thread whenever he spouts his shit.

  1. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny it's over guys

    But we still have the memories!
  2. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL It's in your profile details. You've already been banned once for 24 hours for typing it.

    You know it reassigns to a new person with a new word after you trigger it, right?
  3. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL But we still have the memories!

    memories of you getting destroyed by enter
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Zanick You know it reassigns to a new person with a new word after you trigger it, right?

    Is that right? Well, that explains it!
  5. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Is that right? Well, that explains it!

    I mean, I still won't say it because it's a known trigger word and I'm 50% sure that you can get the same one twice in a row. But, yes, when you return from your ban a new person is trying to get you to say a [usually] different word.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny memories of you getting destroyed by enter

    That's bullshit. ENTER didn't destroy me. All he did was glorify an unintentional oversight I made in saying the web version of Totse on the UBB was 2001, instead of 2000. I was thinking of the 9/11 angle in the back of my mind when I said 2001, that's all. Nobody is perfect. And if you call that being "got", then you sure have a very low estimate of what being "got" is.
  7. Daily an(nu)ally [dissolutely whisk the pantheon]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL That's bullshit. ENTER didn't destroy me. All he did was glorify an unintentional oversight I made in saying the web version of Totse on the UBB was 2001, instead of 2000. I was thinking of the 9/11 angle in the back of my mid when I said 2001, that's all. Nobody is perfect. And if you call that being "got", then you sure have a very low estimate of what being "got" is.

    You need to calm down
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Zanick I mean, I still won't say it because it's a known trigger word and I'm 50% sure that you can get the same one twice in a row. But, yes, when you return from your ban a new person is trying to get you to say a [usually] different word.

    Well, from what I had noticed in passing, even if people quoted the taboo word, or even used it as part of another whole word, they would be banned. But when you were able to quote the taboo word, monster, and you still weren't banned, I knew something was up.
  9. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL That's bullshit. ENTER didn't destroy me. All he did was glorify an unintentional oversight I made in saying the web version of Totse on the UBB was 2001, instead of 2000. I was thinking of the 9/11 angle in the back of my mind when I said 2001, that's all. Nobody is perfect. And if you call that being "got", then you sure have a very low estimate of what being "got" is.

    The problem with this cover is that you've attempted to impress the userbase on countless occasions by claiming an encyclopedia-autismo knowledge of users, dates and administrators. How someone with this unique and versatile talent would commit a simple oversight about something as all-important as when Totse opened or even just your own join date (which you could simply copy from your CV), I cannot fathom.
  10. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL That's bullshit. ENTER didn't destroy me. All he did was glorify an unintentional oversight I made in saying the web version of Totse on the UBB was 2001, instead of 2000. I was thinking of the 9/11 angle in the back of my mind when I said 2001, that's all. Nobody is perfect. And if you call that being "got", then you sure have a very low estimate of what being "got" is.

    that's a lot of excuses for getting rekt speccyboy
  11. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny that's a lot of excuses for getting rekt speccyboy

    Just you saying I was "rekt" does not make it so, kid. Provide the proof. So far, I don't see any.
  12. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Just you saying I was "rekt" does not make it so, kid. Provide the proof. So far, I don't see any.

    seems like there's a lot of proof of your rekedness all over the first page. Would you like me to provide a link to the part where you got caught in a lie?
  13. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Fookin' rekt
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Zanick The problem with this cover is that you've attempted to impress the userbase on countless occasions by claiming an encyclopedia-autismo knowledge of users, dates and administrators. How someone with this unique and versatile talent would commit a simple oversight about something as all-important as when Totse opened or even just your own join date (which you could simply copy from your CV), I cannot fathom.

    Truth be told, those archived screenshots ENTER pointed to are screenshots of the Totse WWW TEST server, not even the real web version of Totse yet. Something he conveniently left out.
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny seems like there's a lot of proof of your rekedness all over the first page. Would you like me to provide a link to the part where you got caught in a lie?

    Yes, provide it.
  16. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Yes, provide it.

    Sure thing bud, there's this one where you were caught in a lie:

    https://niggasin.space/post/362417

    then you tried to change your story again and got busted right here:

    https://niggasin.space/post/362433

    and after that it was just a lot of excuse making on your part.
  17. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, from what I had noticed in passing, even if people quoted the taboo word, or even used it as part of another whole word, they would be banned. But when you were able to quote the taboo word, monster, and you still weren't banned, I knew something was up.

    Nah, quoting doesn't count. A lot of people who quote their taboo word also repeat it themselves, usually because the person they quoted crafted their post strategically to lead the target to that particular word. I could probably say m*nster, but I'd rather not risk it. Posting here is too important to me.
  18. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Well, from what I had noticed in passing, even if people quoted the taboo word, or even used it as part of another whole word, they would be banned. But when you were able to quote the taboo word, monster, and you still weren't banned, I knew something was up.

    You know if you had any of the technical prowess you claim to have you could read the source code and figure out how it works for yourself. There's a link on every page on the site.
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny Sure thing bud, there's this one where you were caught in a lie:

    https://niggasin.space/post/362417

    As I stated before, that's nothing more than a landing page. No users at all on it, as you can see (http://web.archive.org/web/19981212033530/http://www.totse.com:80/). The web version of the Totse community started in 2000, and that makes me 100% correct, except for mistaking the 2000 for 2001. You and he haven't proved any tomfoolery with this.

    Originally posted by Lanny then you tried to change your story again and got busted right here:

    https://niggasin.space/post/362433

    See post above. A landing page does not a BBS make. You have nothing.
  20. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny You know if you had any of the technical prowess you claim to have you could read the source code and figure out how it works for yourself. There's a link on every page on the site.

    As I said, kid, "in passing". I can't be arsed to take the time to examine your stupid source code just to figure out how one of your stupid kid games work. I just wanted to briefly use Zanick as a test subject, that's all - much more convenient and efficient than combing through multiple lines of code like an egghead like you would. Now I know that the word can only be used once. That was all I intended to learn.
Jump to Top