2018-01-14 at 10:08 AM UTC
No. "Literally" doesn't even fit the context, it would have to be "literal". I used the word I intended, and I used it correctly.
2018-01-14 at 10:14 AM UTC
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Please stop.
2018-01-14 at 10:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by D4NG0
You intentionally skipped the first definition:
LITERARY
adjective
1.
pertaining to or of the nature of books and writings, especially those classed as literature
And that fits into your sentence how? You got lucky that "literary" just happened to be a word, even though you meant literally lol. I feel like I'm wasting my time here, but I'll admit it: you've trolled me. Good job. Now go outside for once.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-01-14 at 10:27 AM UTC
It's almost sad to watch you flounder, Enter. You can't even accept you were wrong over something as simple as a single word. Cry harder, bitch.
2018-01-14 at 11:02 AM UTC
I'm sorry enter, but you either don't know what "literary" means, are trolling, or can't admit when you're wrong.
HTS, I don't even know what to think about you anymore
2018-01-14 at 11:03 AM UTC
People have called bling a literary genius since zoklet
2018-01-14 at 12:53 PM UTC
Shit dargo, you didn't just fall for the old literally/literary troll, did you? Surely dargo is just building this up to some double bluff thing and is gonna make enter look really doubly dumb, any moment now. I mean he couldn't have been that stupid, surely..
.