User Controls
This website is boring as fuck
-
2017-11-21 at 2:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL I like the way cowardly Lanny has to fuck with people's usertitles just to "get back at them",
and whats worse is that she did it while your asleep.
gotttdammmmittt lanny, if your going to molest spectral, at least have the decency to molest him while hes wide awake and squealing and throwing around. -
2017-11-21 at 2:34 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 2:53 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 3 PM UTC
Originally posted by S the C …Spectral got cucked HARD….
I wouldn't say that's being cucked hard. Any 10-year old worth his salt can play with his FTP config and change a line of text. Getting cucked hard is like when you are an administrator and you forget to renew your alternate domain name you used to register your own administrator account, and then someone re-registers the alternate domain, sets up an e-mail server on it, and uses a password reset to take over complete control of the main site. Or when you are an administrator, and a half dozen of your mod accounts pop up and start posting in M&A under IPs you've never seen before. Or when you get your ass kicked in so bad, you have to fake a major illness and post a TTFN, because you are getting DDoS'd to shit every other week and getting fired from your job because you were too sloppy to pick up after yourself. -
2017-11-21 at 4:55 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 5:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL You can't even follow the plot, kid, so don't try and pretend you're so smart. I've already gone on record, months ago, to endorse aldra as administrator. Why would I do that if I had myself in mind? No, this has nothing at all to do with me. It has to do with rank abuse of authority on Lanny's part, and I am citing the example of Bill Krozby's account and Bill Krozby's content as just one example of the basis of the evidence.
These are my demands:
1. All ban history will be wiped from Bill Krozby's account.
2. Lanny will take a one-week ban for abuse of authority.
3. Upon his return, Lanny will make a public and written guarantee that he will not abuse either user accounts, or user content, in the Spurious forum, unless disciplinary action is justified.
We can't let Lanny make a mockery of the BBS. Today, it's Bill Krozby. Tomorrow, it's you. Nobody should have to wait for that to happen.
Originally posted by S the C He's a real life coward. I can't even post more than 20 posts without his personal stamp of approval so fuck it I'll keep making alts until I have a good account with 100 posts.
I've been getting people on kik groups to join and start posting so either he bans them for whatever reason or approves them and maybe I can slip by.
The post limit thing clearly does nothing for spam anyways, Dead forum is dead.
Will you please die Will? -
2017-11-21 at 5:02 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 5:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL I wouldn't say that's being cucked hard. Any 10-year old worth his salt can play with his FTP config and change a line of text. Getting cucked hard is like when you are an administrator and you forget to renew your alternate domain name you used to register your own administrator account, and then someone re-registers the alternate domain, sets up an e-mail server on it, and uses a password reset to take over complete control of the main site. Or when you are an administrator, and a half dozen of your mod accounts pop up and start posting in M&A under IPs you've never seen before. Or when you get your ass kicked in so bad, you have to fake a major illness and post a TTFN, because you are getting DDoS'd to shit every other week and getting fired from your job because you were too sloppy to pick up after yourself.
I love stories. Tell another one. -
2017-11-21 at 6:04 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 6:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by Zpace Khat THose were "wrong thread".
the only spam is those bots which I pushed off the front page like I always do cuz nobody else gives a fuck.
How can they be "wrong"? What makes them wrong? And even if it is wrong, why should a single person be singled out to be banned under the "wrong" premise? You see how little sense the situation makes? But, it actually does make sense, because when you have a shitty, butt-hurt, obstinate, power-abusing admin, it makes perfect sense, doesn't it? -
2017-11-21 at 6:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL How can they be "wrong"? What makes them wrong? And even if it is wrong, why should a single person be singled out to be banned under the "wrong" premise? You see how little sense the situation makes? But, it actually does make sense, because when you have a shitty, butt-hurt, obstinate, power-abusing admin, it makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
come on .... when you had the power you too went around dictating which post belonged to which section.
and not only that, you even moved perfectly fine thread where they were to that verboten place ......
der trazhkan. -
2017-11-21 at 6:29 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 9:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader come on …. when you had the power you too went around dictating which post belonged to which section.
and not only that, you even moved perfectly fine thread where they were to that verboten place ……
der trazhkan.
Moving is not the same as banning, kid. You really need to up your game, benny. You're not dealing with an amateur here. -
2017-11-21 at 9:38 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 9:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader so you do agree that theres such a thing as a wrong thread in a wrong place contrary to what you said in post 50.
What I said was, nobody should be forcing anyone to post a topical thread in the topical forums. While I don't personally agree with flooding Spurious with topical threads, I know for a fact banning people for it is counter-productive and unfair, because it's not spam. Accounts should only be banned for spam, spreading PI, admitting to crimes, organizing crimes, or in some way attempting to degrade the BBS, its content or its userbase. So, in effect, it's Lanny who should be banned, not Bill Krozby. -
2017-11-21 at 9:59 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 10:03 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 10:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL What I said was, nobody should be forcing anyone to post a topical thread in the topical forums. While I don't personally agree with flooding Spurious with topical threads, I know for a fact banning people for it is counter-productive and unfair, because it's not spam. Accounts should only be banned for spam, spreading PI, admitting to crimes, organizing crimes, or in some way attempting to degrade the BBS, its content or its userbase. So, in effect, it's Lanny who should be banned, not Bill Krozby.
Nobody has cared what you think since January 2009. No, I'm wrong. They did not care then either. -
2017-11-21 at 10:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader yes … the double talking spectral we knew just like back in the old days.
threatening bbs security …. lol.
Benny, benny, benny.. when will you learn that words are important, son? I never threatened to hack the site. If I had done that, I would have said, "I am going to hack this site." But I didn't. Instead, I said I have a decision to make - a decision between hacking the site or resigning from the BBS scene altogether. No intention to hack the site was presented. You just interpreted the words I used to support your ongoing personal vendetta about a pedo thread you made that I locked. That's all. -
2017-11-21 at 10:10 PM UTC
