User Controls
No, I'm serious, how do I meet more women.
-
2017-11-15 at 7:11 PM UTCAren't you gay?
-
2017-11-15 at 8:24 PM UTCI was a 7 (which means really a 6)
but my charming ways was 8-9 at times
I'm an ugly old beast now.. but it blows me away to see all the beautiful women from my teen/20 years are mostly homely or really old. I mean some look crazy old now. many of them awkwardly fat, saggy.
I havn't aged much in 10 years. I mean if I shave right now, I look early 40s. it's the goatee making me look like I'm the age I am.
So for my age.. I'm 6-7 still. -
2017-11-15 at 8:29 PM UTC
-
2017-11-15 at 8:47 PM UTCDon't you ever see people? Even if you have no friends or whatever you gotta' have family right? Lol, first gf i ever had was the 'best friend' of one of my many cousins. I have a lot of cousins, hey, even better idea. Date a cousin if you have any qt female ones. Or if you're not into it, just hang out at places where people congregate and strike up a conversation with someone. It's not that hard.
-
2017-11-15 at 9:14 PM UTC
-
2017-11-16 at 1:05 AM UTC
-
2017-11-16 at 1:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by greenplastic So you got invited to a party by a girl but you blew her off to get drunk and post here?
lol, no! I was home by then, but still really drunk.
But yeah just because I was invited by a girl doesn't mean shit. They don't like me. It's cool whatever... I made this thread ages ago and don't really care anymore. -
2017-11-16 at 1:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Enter lol, no! I was home by then, but still really drunk.
But yeah just because I was invited by a girl doesn't mean shit. They don't like me. It's cool whatever… I made this thread ages ago and don't really care anymore.
What kind of car do you have. it shows what kind of girl is impressed. color for younger people is black. older men prefer silver, blue silver or dark blue SUV trucks etc -
2017-11-16 at 5:50 AM UTC
-
2017-11-16 at 6:10 AM UTCJoin a cult and start banging unshaven chicks with daddy issues
-
2017-11-16 at 7:57 AM UTC
-
2017-11-16 at 12:45 PM UTC
-
2017-11-16 at 2:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist i know but nearly all gays are faggots so calling you a faggot has a 99.99996% probability of being correct.
I know lots of gay bodybuilders and businessmen who don't act gay.
Homosexuality is pretty problematic in itself, but the use of faggot as a term of demeanment started with urban women who saw gays as sexual competition. It's actually fairly common for guys to engage in same-sex sexual acts at some stage in their lives. Obviously it should be discouraged, but making fun of someone for doing it is kinda low. -
2017-11-16 at 2:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Issue313 I know lots of gay bodybuilders and businessmen who don't act gay.
Homosexuality is pretty problematic in itself, but the use of faggot as a term of demeanment started with urban women who saw gays as sexual competition. It's actually fairly common for guys to engage in same-sex sexual acts at some stage in their lives. Obviously it should be discouraged, but making fun of someone for doing it is kinda low.
Faggot -
2017-11-16 at 3:14 PM UTC
-
2017-11-16 at 3:33 PM UTCThe normalisation of homosexuality is evidence that the slippery slope is not a fallacy in pragmatic terms
-
2017-11-16 at 5:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Takes one to know one
i think you know full well that's not correct. that would imply the human mind is incapable of understanding the behavior of others.
it is hilarious that you still think i'm that insecure with my sexuality that i would get all mad and butthurt at the suggestion i was a faggot tho, lol.
. -
2017-11-16 at 7:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Daily The normalisation of homosexuality is evidence that the slippery slope is not a fallacy in pragmatic terms
A "slippery slope" is not itself a fallacy you simpleton.
The slippery slope fallacy is when someone asserts a thing is a slippery slope, but it isn't ("gays marrying? Next we'll be marrying dogs and cats!"), the same way not all personal attacks are an ad hominem fallacy, and referring to an actual authority is not argumentum ad auctoritatem fallacy. -
2017-11-16 at 7:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon A "slippery slope" is not itself a fallacy you simpleton.
The slippery slope fallacy is when someone asserts a thing is a slippery slope, but it isn't ("gays marrying? Next we'll be marrying dogs and cats!"), the same way not all personal attacks are an ad hominem fallacy, and referring to an actual authority is not argumentum ad auctoritatem fallacy.
i was about to absorb the contents of this post but then i remembered its author is a brown person from pakistan -
2017-11-16 at 7:18 PM UTCAbsorb this then, because you're still wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeA slippery slope argument (SSA), in logic, critical thinking, political rhetoric, and caselaw, is a consequentialist logical device[1] in which a party asserts that a relatively small first step leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant (usually negative) effect.