User Controls
Aesthetics is first among the natural sciences
-
2017-09-19 at 6:13 PM UTC
-
2017-09-19 at 7:18 PM UTC
-
2017-09-19 at 7:20 PM UTCAnd you know what, you are dumb Obbe. You're the biggest fucking wannabe intellectual on this entire website and you never seem to do a particularly good job at it either. Like i said in the beginning of the thread, just stay out of this. Go away, you're annoying.
-
2017-09-19 at 7:31 PM UTCdisregard
Post last edited by RisiR † at 2017-09-19T19:55:59.717696+00:00 -
2017-09-19 at 7:35 PM UTCThere's nothing wrong with this sort of conversation but people like Lanny, Malice, Obbe, HTS, probably some others... they all ruin it with their reductionism and need to argue. Do I really need to bring up the rainbows aren't real thing? Nobody over 14 should think about philosophy this much. It's just a massive fucking circlejerk, every time.
People like RisiR and Sophie and mq on the other hand always do a really good job of explaining their opinions succinctly without trying to ARGUE, like their opinion is somehow right. At least Malice accepted it and trolled the fuck out of people with it. He's a brilliant troll. -
2017-09-19 at 7:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by 霍比特人说中文不好 Nobody over 14 should think about philosophy this much.
Good thing we have an internet personality who lives with his parents and is known for traveling across the country to get laid (and get butt fucked) to tell us what the appropriate ways to think are. Think how much better my life would be if I would just stop thinking about philosophy and follow in §m£ÂgØL's footsteps. I'm going to run down to the philosophy department at school and announce everyone's wasting their time, instead we should all uhhh, become unsuccessful authors? Yeah, that definitely makes sense.It's just a massive fucking circlejerk, every time.
Are we arguing to much and offending your sensibilities, or is it a circlejerk? Kinda seems like it's got to be one or the other. -
2017-09-19 at 8:03 PM UTCI don't think we as a community have a problem with too much intellectual discussion. Haha.
It's pretty easy to ignore the threads nowadays and the overall attitude is more shitpostery than ever. -
2017-09-19 at 8:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Good thing we have an internet personality who lives with his parents and is known for traveling across the country to get laid (and get butt fucked) to tell us what the appropriate ways to think are. Think how much better my life would be if I would just stop thinking about philosophy and follow in §m£ÂgØL's footsteps. I'm going to run down to the philosophy department at school and announce everyone's wasting their time, instead we should all uhhh, become unsuccessful authors? Yeah, that definitely makes sense.
Are we arguing to much and offending your sensibilities, or is it a circlejerk? Kinda seems like it's got to be one or the other.
This is really just furthering my point that you feel the need to be right. You literally cannot accept that somebody can think differently than you. Look at how defensive you, Obbe, and HTS all got. It is way too easy to push your buttons. -
2017-09-19 at 8:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by 霍比特人说中文不好 There's nothing wrong with this sort of conversation but people like Lanny, Malice, Obbe, HTS, probably some others… they all ruin it with their reductionism and need to argue. Do I really need to bring up the rainbows aren't real thing? Nobody over 14 should think about philosophy this much. It's just a massive fucking circlejerk, every time.
People like RisiR and Sophie and mq on the other hand always do a really good job of explaining their opinions succinctly without trying to ARGUE, like their opinion is somehow right. At least Malice accepted it and trolled the fuck out of people with it. He's a brilliant troll.
Why are you so mad when people enjoy themselves, gluolm? -
2017-09-19 at 8:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by 霍比特人说中文不好 This is really just furthering my point that you feel the need to be right. You literally cannot accept that somebody can think differently than you. Look at how defensive you, Obbe, and HTS all got. It is way too easy to push your buttons.
Why are you upset when people try to understand each other beyond "yeah I don't give a fuck why you think that" gullmo? -
2017-09-19 at 8:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie And you know what, you are dumb Obbe. You're the biggest fucking wannabe intellectual on this entire website and you never seem to do a particularly good job at it either. Like i said in the beginning of the thread, just stay out of this. Go away, you're annoying.
The feeling is mutual, Psycho-"hey everyone look at my code feel my edgelord"-manthis. -
2017-09-19 at 8:59 PM UTC
-
2017-09-19 at 9:01 PM UTC§m£ÂgØL seems like the kind of dude who hates quantum physics because it's reductive to the point of incompatibility with the systems he understands more intuitively.
-
2017-09-19 at 9:01 PM UTCThat thread was the epitome of retardation.
-
2017-09-19 at 9:02 PM UTC
-
2017-09-19 at 9:08 PM UTCWatch as my point continues to be proven by these wannabe pseudo-intellectuals
-
2017-09-19 at 9:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Yeah but you refused to acknowledge you were wrong pretty hard though fam.
Pretty sure that depends on how we are defining colour, fam. If you are defining colour as a specific wavelength of light, then yes obviously the position I was arguing for in that thread is wrong. Not that I was seriously arguing "rainbows don't exist", if you believe I was you have no sense of humor. But if you are defining colour as the subjective experience of colour... well... that was kinda the whole point of the thread. Words can mean different things. Semantics. -
2017-09-19 at 9:12 PM UTCITS NOT SEMANTICS! God fu..
-
2017-09-19 at 9:14 PM UTC
-
2017-09-19 at 9:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Pretty sure that depends on how we are defining colour, fam. If you are defining colour as a specific wavelength of light, then yes obviously the position I was arguing for in that thread is wrong. Not that I was seriously arguing "rainbows don't exist", if you believe I was you have no sense of humor. But if you are defining colour as the subjective experience of colour… well… that was kinda the whole point of the thread. Words can mean different things. Semantics.
I'm not opening this can of faggots again, fam. I schooled you well enough in the thread.
