USDA orders removal of climate change mentions from public websites

1. 2025-02-01 at 3:56 PM UTC

   #1
   

   Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
   USDA orders removal of climate change mentions from public websites
   
   

   The U.S. Department of Agriculture has directed agency officials to review and remove content related to climate change from its public websites, according to internal emails obtained by ABC News.
   
   The directive instructs web managers to identify, archive, or unpublish materials mentioning climate change by "no later than close of business this Friday," according to the emails.
   
   Critics warn these actions will accelerate climate change and disproportionately harm vulnerable communities.

2. 2025-02-01 at 4:26 PM UTC

   #2
   

   Tab Numlock Houston
   Good. The climate cult is not just wrong but the opposite is true. CO2 is far too LOW. During glacial periods, it falls to within 30ppm of the death of all C3 plants. That's 90% of plants. Fossil fuels are not causing the next mass extinction, they are preventing it.
   
   We need to get CO2 to 1,000ppm (0.1%). Then ,during the next glacial period, it may only fall to the level we have today, 400ppm.
   
   
   To learn the truth, I recommend people start with this graph.
   
   
3. 2025-02-01 at 4:29 PM UTC

   #3
   

   Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
   Plants communicate and think.
4. 2025-02-03 at 10:35 AM UTC

   #4
   

   Speedy Parker Black Hole

   Originally posted by Tab Numlock Good. The climate cult is not just wrong but the opposite is true. CO2 is far too LOW. During glacial periods, it falls to within 30ppm of the death of all C3 plants. That's 90% of plants. Fossil fuels are not causing the next mass extinction, they are preventing it.
   
   We need to get CO2 to 1,000ppm (0.1%). Then ,during the next glacial period, it may only fall to the level we have today, 400ppm.
   
   
   To learn the truth, I recommend people start with this graph.
   
   

   
   The termites saved life on earth with CO2 farts.
5. 2025-02-03 at 12:10 PM UTC

   #5
   

   Elbow African Astronaut
   
6. 2025-02-03 at 12:11 PM UTC

   #6
   

   Elbow African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Obbe Plants communicate and think.

   
   we have a moral obligation to
   
   
   ahhh forget it
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • Obbe
7. 2025-02-03 at 6:35 PM UTC

   #7
   

   the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
   Climate Change is a non technical term we should be calling Anthroprogenic Greenhouse Heating through industrialization
8. 2025-02-03 at 6:38 PM UTC

   #8
   Cosmopolitan Tuskegee Airman

   Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Climate Change is a non technical term we should be calling Anthroprogenic Greenhouse Heating through industrialization

   
   AGHTI
9. 2025-02-03 at 6:41 PM UTC

   #9
   

   Knitler Houston
   I wrote a research paper in May about curbside recycling and sent it to OP. That cunt had the audacity to respond, "why would I care?"
10. 2025-02-03 at 8:19 PM UTC

    #10
    

    Semiazas African Astronaut
11. 2025-02-04 at 3:35 AM UTC

    #11
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole

    Originally posted by Semiazas

    
    This is one of my favorite chapters.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • Semiazas
12. 2025-02-04 at 3:37 AM UTC

    #12
    

    Semiazas African Astronaut
    My only question is and maybe they explain in the book, if the trees talk amongst themselves, shouldn't treebeard have known about this long before?
    
    Epic scene, either way
13. 2025-02-04 at 2:48 PM UTC

    #13
    Charles Ex Machina Naturally Camouflaged

    Originally posted by Speedy Parker This is one of my favorite chapters.

    
    was it because the talking tree also had a deformed nose that you can relate well
14. 2025-02-04 at 2:50 PM UTC

    #14
    Charles Ex Machina Naturally Camouflaged

    Originally posted by Semiazas My only question is and maybe they explain in the book, if the trees talk amongst themselves, shouldn't treebeard have known about this long before?

    
    why didnt they scream while they were being chopped down ?
    
    all this seems like some kind of retroactive "rape" thing.
15. 2025-02-04 at 3:52 PM UTC

    #15
    

    Instigator Naturally Camouflaged [the staring tame crusher]
    I swear some of the trees were cannibalising eachother in the movies aswell.
16. 2025-02-04 at 4:16 PM UTC

    #16
    

    Tab Numlock Houston
    
17. 2025-02-07 at 7:09 PM UTC

    #17
    

    Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Interdasting.
18. 2025-02-07 at 7:22 PM UTC

    #18
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole

    Originally posted by Obbe Interdasting.

    
    Real science is.