User Controls
The Cycle of Civilization
-
2025-01-31 at 3:41 PM UTC*Whites move into a sparsely populated region
*They improve the land and create abundance
*This attracts nonwhite migrants
*Whites mix with the migrants and locals
*They descend into permanent mediocrity
*The new mongrel race takes credit for past white achievements
This describes Egypt and India as well as S Africa and California.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2025-01-31 at 3:43 PM UTCthat's pretty delusionalThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2025-01-31 at 3:44 PM UTCpoop
-
2025-01-31 at 3:46 PM UTC
-
2025-01-31 at 3:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Tab Numlock How so?
* whites move into a region
* ruthlessly exploit natives as a means to ruthlessly exploit local resources
* build infrastructure insofar as it assists in the efficient exploitation of resources
* send resources back home to process them into goods and improve quality of life at the seat of the empire
* sell goods back to the colonies at an extreme markup in order to justify continued exploitation of resources and labour
* repeat
the different colonial powers did things a little differently, like the British would brutalise one group and favour another to create a loyal managerial class
the French and Spaniards would bang out a class of mulattos to the same end
the Belgians would brutalise everyone and force them to build autistic infrastructure projects like railroads that the natives couldn't possibly maintain to try to instill a sense of pride and superiority
but the goal is always the same -
2025-01-31 at 3:57 PM UTCyou don't get it guys, King Leopold was actually trying to uplift the Congolese by forcing them into slavery, working millions to death and cutting their hands off when they didn't meet quotasThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2025-01-31 at 4:02 PM UTCBefore Columbus, the world's population was half a billion, the average lifespan was 25 yrs and literacy was <1%. The population is now 16x higher, lifespans nearly 3x and literacy approaching 90%. White men are truly god-like.
-
2025-01-31 at 4:04 PM UTC
-
2025-01-31 at 4:08 PM UTC25 yrs is stretching it. Most kids never grew up and half the women died in childbirth. Half the men died by homicide (murder and war).
Whites not only brought their tech but also law and order. -
2025-01-31 at 4:10 PM UTCthe only way 25 years makes sense is if you factor in infant mortality, dragging the average down with an enormous number of zeroes (which data isn't all that reliable for anyway). average lifespan of literal cavemen was close to 50 if we just go off remains.
-
2025-01-31 at 4:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by ner vegas the only way 25 years makes sense is if you factor in infant mortality, dragging the average down with an enormous number of zeroes (which data isn't all that reliable for anyway). average lifespan of literal cavemen was close to 50 if we just go off remains.
Yeah I forgot libs love dead babbies. -
2025-01-31 at 5:38 PM UTC
-
2025-01-31 at 6:06 PM UTCThere can be less cavemen if women do this:
-
2025-01-31 at 7:27 PM UTC
-
2025-02-01 at 2:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Tab Numlock *Whites move into a sparsely populated region
*They improve the land and create abundance
*This attracts nonwhite migrants
*Whites mix with migrants and locals
*They descend into permanent mediocrity
*The new mongrel race takes credit for past white achievements
This describes Egypt and India as well as S Africa and California.
OP, enthralled in white supremacist delusion, engages in a fun bout of historical revisionismThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2025-02-01 at 3:07 PM UTCEvery time he posted one if these Hitler/master race threads it I feel it's kinda like a retarded version of stratego
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2025-02-01 at 4:14 PM UTCThe British didn't really mix with the locals in South Asia, or at least not in the northwest. It usually happened in the Bay of Bengal area. And it wasn't exactly all that widespread. Indians nowadays just cling on the achievements of ancient Pakistanis. Every reference to "ancient India" is actually a reference to modern-day Pakistan. A good example would be Alexander the Great's Indian campaign. That took place in Pakistan, not India. It's just confusing because modern-day Indians adopted an identity that is technically not theirs. The Aryans settled in Punjab and wrote the Rig Veda there, starting proto-Hinduism. So the only Indians who can claim Hinduism (or at least proto-Hinduism) would be Indian Punjabis, considering Punjab is split into Pakistan (55% of landmass) and India (45% of landmass). However, most Punjabis are Muslim (112 million) or Sikh (25 to 28 million) and the rest (17 million to 19 million) are Hindus.
-
2025-02-01 at 4:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by Michael Myers The British didn't really mix with the locals in South Asia, or at least not in the northwest. It usually happened in the Bay of Bengal area. And it wasn't exactly all that widespread. Indians nowadays just cling on the achievements of ancient Pakistanis. Every reference to "ancient India" is actually a reference to modern-day Pakistan. A good example would be Alexander the Great's Indian campaign. That took place in Pakistan, not India. It's just confusing because modern-day Indians adopted an identity that is technically not theirs. The Aryans settled in Punjab and wrote the Rig Veda there, starting proto-Hinduism. So the only Indians who can claim Hinduism (or at least proto-Hinduism) would be Indian Punjabis, considering Punjab is split into Pakistan (55% of landmass) and India (45% of landmass). However, most Punjabis are Muslim (112 million) or Sikh (25 to 28 million) and the rest (17 million to 19 million) are Hindus.
Retarded shit. -
2025-02-01 at 4:28 PM UTC
