Quantum Teleportation Becomes Reality on Active Internet Cables

1. 2024-12-25 at 2:45 AM UTC

   #21
   

   the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
   The proof of all that shit is bunch of fancy math that I don't understand. Now I might just be some amateur country scientist but I dont need numbers to tell me that spooky science entanglement shit is clearly connected in one or as many dimensions via infinite long vibrating sub Planck strings
   
   If anything is interacting through these dimensions they must be connected to this string lattice
   
   Pulling on one particle in one place pulls another particle in another place from the giant junble of wires in the middle
2. 2024-12-25 at 2:54 AM UTC

   #22
   

   ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Black Hole
   So you can't observe Particle B on the other side if you are observing Particle A on this side. But if you don't observe Particle A, you won't know what position particle B is in. The solution is have a machine do the observing. Now, you wouldn't be able to just have the machine observe particle A while examining particle B at the same time and provide the human the results, because just the act of you observing the results from the machine negates the desired result from the machine. Therefore, the machine must act entirely and wholly independent of the human observer, and the information it is then able to collect and store from Particle B on the other side is proprietary to the machine alone. So the question is: what good is the information the machine possesses if you, as a human, are unable to access it without the result being reverted? Now, let's say you instruct the machine to encrypt the information from Particle B it possesses, then have it RE-encrypt that encrypted information. You can now read the RE-encrypted information, with the original encryption having been reverted within, but the information from Particle B still nested within the re-encryption. You have fooled the Matrix.
3. 2024-12-25 at 3:23 AM UTC

   #23
   

   the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
   I'm not convinced 'observing' it is what causes the phenomena
   
   Sounds like a bunch of BS to me. Things do not react to being observed unless sentient
   
   This can only conclude that the thing being observed is actually something else that isnt being observed
   
   Like a string being broken or something else that we can't see. But it has to be something physical interacting in a way that makes sense or else our understanding is wrong.
   
   It cannot be magic and unless someone has a good source for anti quantum's and muh 17 gravities im just not buying it
4. 2024-12-25 at 3:25 AM UTC

   #24
   

   ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Black Hole

   Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I'm not convinced 'observing' it is what causes the phenomena
   
   Sounds like a bunch of BS to me. Things do not react to being observed unless sentient
   
   This can only conclude that the thing being observed is actually something else that isnt being observed
   
   Like a string being broken or something else that we can't see. But it has to be something
   
   It cannot be magic and unless someone has a good source for anti quantum's and muh 17 gravities im just not buying it

   
   Think of it this way, though. Your brain actually controls your reality. It is like a remote wireless computer, which can send and receive. When you look at it in that sense, your perception alone becomes critical in the behavior of the reality.
5. 2024-12-25 at 3:27 AM UTC

   #25
   

   the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]

   Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Therefore, the machine must act entirely and wholly independent of the human observer.

   
   "Observing" it is interacting with the machine, we just can't observe the interactions because they are too small.
   
   But they are definitely caused by humans when 'observed'
   
   It's not in a superposition possibility, you moved it and lost it