User Controls

Wikipedia Editors Officially Deem Trump a Fascist

  1. #21
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]

    holy shit they rewrote his entire wikipedia in the style of hitler or stalin
  2. #22
    All these left wing chronic liars and frauds are on their very last legs. That's why they are imploding with a last burst of intense personal attacks and fits of rage. They're like a cockroach that's been stepped on, but isn't quite dead yet.
  3. #23
    Kingoftoes Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood

    Thanks, just goes to show the ambiguity of language, especially in a nation as large and culturally diverse as the USA.
  4. #24
    Once Trump is declared King, the New World Order will go into speedy operational status, with Elon leading the technological charge.
  5. #25
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    Originally posted by Kafka It's scary these people are radicalised to believe wild conspiracy theories, like my sister's boyfriend believes the moon landing didn't happen. I don't want to be anywhere near him in case he's told some conspiracy like women are witches next.

    I fuck witches for sport


    .
  6. #26
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    And that's what I'm doing for All Hallows eve


    .
  7. #27
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood
    holy shit they rewrote his entire wikipedia in the style of hitler or stalin


    Wiki Wiki, Trump is massive


  8. #28
    Originally posted by Kingoftoes Thanks, just goes to show the ambiguity of language, especially in a nation as large and culturally diverse as the USA.

    theres no ambigiuty between nigger robusta and nigger arabica
  9. #29
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    wow thats crazy
  10. #30
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood wow thats crazy
  11. #31
    It's crazy it's crazy it's crazy.
  12. #32
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Concerned Citizen Straight from the the most respectable source, there is no denying that Trump supporters are officially fascist!
    The whole world thinks the USA is a laughing stock because this fascist, this will go down in history as the darkest period in US history.

    We are going to them this time, they will barred from voting, jobs, and public spaces!

    LANNY IS A CUCK!
    LOCK HIM UP!

    GO, KAMALA, GO!



    https://www.piratewires.com/p/donald-trump-fascism-authoritarianism-wikipedia

    Wikipedia is a tool for spreading bullshit

    https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-wikipedia

    What’s Wrong with Wikipedia?
    There's nothing more convenient than Wikipedia if you're looking for some quick information, and when the stakes are low (you need a piece of information to settle a bet with your roommate, or you want to get a basic sense of what something means before starting more in-depth research), you may get what you need from Wikipedia. In fact, some instructors may advise their students to read entries for scientific concepts on Wikipedia as a way to begin understanding those concepts.

    Nevertheless, when you're doing academic research, you should be extremely cautious about using Wikipedia. As its own disclaimer states, information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who wants to post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration. Users may be reading information that is outdated or that has been posted by someone who is not an expert in the field —or by someone who wishes to provide misinformation. While Wikipedia editors do correct misinformation, observers have found that they don’t catch everything—at least not right away.

    Sometimes inaccurate information is posted to Wikipedia on purpose, as a hoax. In some well-documented cases, this inaccurate information continues to spread when people take it from Wikipedia and use it in books and articles.

    If you do start with Wikipedia, you should make sure articles you read contain citations–and then go read the cited articles to check the accuracy of what you read on Wikipedia. For research papers, you should rely on the sources cited by Wikipedia authors rather than on Wikipedia itself.

    You can find more information about the errors that have been caught on Wikipedia on the Wikipediocracy site.

    There are other sites besides Wikipedia that feature user-generated content, including Quora and Reddit. These sites may show up in your search results, especially when you type a question into Google. Keep in mind that because these sites are user-authored, they are not reliable sources of fact-checked information. If you find something you think might be useful to you on one of those sites, you should look for another source for this information.

    The fact that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic research doesn't mean that it's wrong to use basic reference materials when you're trying to familiarize yourself with a topic. In fact, the Harvard librarians can point you to specialized encyclopedias in different fields that offer introductory information. These sources can be particularly useful when you need background information or context for a topic you're writing about.
  13. #33
    Funny how they don't even mention the most striking thing about Wikipedia: that it's run and controlled by a bunch of ultra-partisan, radical, left wing Marxists.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. #34
    if wikipedia says the sky is blue and grasses are green then shlomo parker is going to tell yiu that the sky is green and grasses blue.

  15. #35
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Blue Grass kicks ass
Jump to Top