User Controls
i have a perennial hatred of fat people
-
2024-10-19 at 1 AM UTCI have an annual love of pootie tang
-
2024-10-19 at 1 AM UTCPoot in tang
-
2024-10-19 at 1 AM UTCPoot in that thang
-
2024-10-19 at 1:01 AM UTCPuddin taint
-
2024-10-19 at 1:02 AM UTCC-c-c-combo breaker!The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2024-10-19 at 1:02 AM UTC
-
2024-10-19 at 1:30 AM UTCTo Whom It May Concern:
As the System Operator of & the Temple of the Screaming Electron and
the network co-ordinator for NIRVANAnet(tm) I wanted to thank your
paper for the extra publicity that Michael Liedtke's sensationalistic
article "MODEM OPERANDI: Tips On Crime Go On-line" has provided for our
BBS network.
I helped to start NIRVANAnet(tm) four years ago because I wanted to
create a computer network where ideas, any ideas, could be freely
exchanged between people. I wanted to create a network that was open,
free, and easily accessable.
When you exchange messages with people on NIRVANAnet(tm), you do not
know the age, gender, race, religious affiliation, political party,
hair length, mode of dress, or sexual orientation of the person you are
talking to. Because of this, people cannot be pigeon-holed into neat
little categories and you end up learning an amazing amount about the
thoughts, feelings, and beliefs of a much wider array of people than
you would encounter in everyday life. On our network teenagers talk to
grandparents, bikers talk with born-again Christians, and Socialists
talk to Republicans. These people would never speak to one another if
they met on the street, but because they can use computers, they freely
exchange thoughts, ideas, dreams and hopes.
Mr. Liedtke stated that we are "Using the First Amendment as a legal
shield" and that "The bulletin boards remain open by straddling a fine
line between the legal definitions of free speech and criminal
behavior."
I'm surprised that a newspaper reporter, of all people, has such a
callous disregard for the First Ammendment. There is no "fine line". We
are not engaged in criminal activities, period. We are engaged in
speech, period. Speech is protected, period. When the day comes where
people can be imprisoned merely for what they say or what they think,
it's time to move to another country. As Pacific Bell spokesman Craig
Watts stated in the article "You can't prosecute someone for bad
thoughts."
The information in the "criminal" text files that Mr. Liedtke refers to
can be found in any well-stocked library, or ordered from any number of
book publishers in this country. Many of our files were found on the
Internet, a worldwide government/university/industry network funded in
part by the National Science Foundation.
The article also stated that "The Times isn't publishing the phone
numbers of the rebel bulletin boards as a children's safeguard."
Another reason might be that people would actually call the systems in
question and find out that Mr. Liedtke did not tell the whole story,
and as everyone knows, the most effective way to lie is to only tell
part of the truth.
Sincerely,
Jeff Hunter
Sysop, & the Temple of the Screaming ElectronThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-10-19 at 1:40 AM UTCWozny u should suck spectral dick while you both look at photos of Jeff Hunter
-
2024-10-19 at 4:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ To Whom It May Concern:
As the System Operator of & the Temple of the Screaming Electron and
the network co-ordinator for NIRVANAnet™ I wanted to thank your
paper for the extra publicity that Michael Liedtke's sensationalistic
article "MODEM OPERANDI: Tips On Crime Go On-line" has provided for our
BBS network.
I helped to start NIRVANAnet™ four years ago because I wanted to
create a computer network where ideas, any ideas, could be freely
exchanged between people. I wanted to create a network that was open,
free, and easily accessable.
When you exchange messages with people on NIRVANAnet™, you do not
know the age, gender, race, religious affiliation, political party,
hair length, mode of dress, or sexual orientation of the person you are
talking to. Because of this, people cannot be pigeon-holed into neat
little categories and you end up learning an amazing amount about the
thoughts, feelings, and beliefs of a much wider array of people than
you would encounter in everyday life. On our network teenagers talk to
grandparents, bikers talk with born-again Christians, and Socialists
talk to Republicans. These people would never speak to one another if
they met on the street, but because they can use computers, they freely
exchange thoughts, ideas, dreams and hopes.
Mr. Liedtke stated that we are "Using the First Amendment as a legal
shield" and that "The bulletin boards remain open by straddling a fine
line between the legal definitions of free speech and criminal
behavior."
I'm surprised that a newspaper reporter, of all people, has such a
callous disregard for the First Ammendment. There is no "fine line". We
are not engaged in criminal activities, period. We are engaged in
speech, period. Speech is protected, period. When the day comes where
people can be imprisoned merely for what they say or what they think,
it's time to move to another country. As Pacific Bell spokesman Craig
Watts stated in the article "You can't prosecute someone for bad
thoughts."
The information in the "criminal" text files that Mr. Liedtke refers to
can be found in any well-stocked library, or ordered from any number of
book publishers in this country. Many of our files were found on the
Internet, a worldwide government/university/industry network funded in
part by the National Science Foundation.
The article also stated that "The Times isn't publishing the phone
numbers of the rebel bulletin boards as a children's safeguard."
Another reason might be that people would actually call the systems in
question and find out that Mr. Liedtke did not tell the whole story,
and as everyone knows, the most effective way to lie is to only tell
part of the truth.
Sincerely,
Jeff Hunter
Sysop, & the Temple of the Screaming Electron
I tried to talk to Michael but he told me he was no longer working for that Paper and works in Sports at Reuters now.
they clearly scared the ever loving shit out of this guy. -
2024-10-19 at 5:21 AM UTC
-
2024-10-19 at 5:26 AM UTC
-
2024-10-19 at 5:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Or maybe you just creeped him out with you paranoid obsession.
Its his job to talk to people interested in his article. even if he left CoCo Times. It was very unprofessional of him even if he was understandably frighten off by someone who probably paid him a hard visit after "The nerds" all sent him cryptic messages in their retort about how they felt they were being unfairly viewed and the False Narrative of their network.
he should of manned up and just talked to me.
but if someone was threatening his life, we know what kind of people we're dealing with. Not "Revenge of the Nerds" -
2024-10-19 at 5:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by Far McFar Its his job to talk to people interested in his article. even if he left CoCo Times. It was very unprofessional of him even if he was understandably frighten off by someone who probably paid him a hard visit after "The nerds" all sent him cryptic messages in their retort about how they felt they were being unfairly viewed and the False Narrative of their network.
he should of manned up and just talked to me.
but if someone was threatening his life, we know what kind of people we're dealing with. Not "Revenge of the Nerds"
A reporters job is not to talk to people interested in the articles they've written you stupid cow.
Can you imagine if every reporter in the country took calls from readers to answer questions about their articles?
Do you see how stupid you sound now?
Some moron calls you at work with paranoid questions about an article you wrote for a former employer and you're just supposed to drop everything and cater to Sammy Spazcakes over the phone.
You really have zero self awareness. -
2024-10-19 at 5:46 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker A reporters job is not to talk to people interested in the articles they've written you stupid cow.
Can you imagine if every reporter in the country took calls from readers to answer questions about their articles?
Do you see how stupid you sound now?
Some moron calls you at work with paranoid questions about an article you wrote for a former employer and you're just supposed to drop everything and cater to Sammy Spazcakes over the phone.
You really have zero self awareness.
first off I didn't call him right after it was posted. It was posted in 1992 and I came on board (&T) in 1993. it was one of the first thing I kept hearing about and then there was the Bill the Preacher guy with a local phone number but apparently he lived on the east coast? had a 415 or 510 number, I forget.
I called him and kept getting his answering machine and he or someone picked up and yelled "NOT INTERESTED" and I think I heard "asshole" and then slammed the house receiver down super hard.
I wanted to pick his mind. that was that. FLMAO at preacher cussing me out. just wanted to know what happened in detail -
2024-10-19 at 6 AM UTC
Originally posted by Far McFar first off I didn't call him right after it was posted. It was posted in 1992 and I came on board (&T) in 1993. it was one of the first thing I kept hearing about and then there was the Bill the Preacher guy with a local phone number but apparently he lived on the east coast? had a 415 or 510 number, I forget.
I called him and kept getting his answering machine and he or someone picked up and yelled "NOT INTERESTED" and I think I heard "asshole" and then slammed the house receiver down super hard.
I wanted to pick his mind. that was that. FLMAO at preacher cussing me out. just wanted to know what happened in detail
Yeah, that's not at all creepy or stalker vibed.
Fuck d00d you have no clue what your actions and words look like to others. It's no wonder you're socially awkward. You have no way of receiving or processing the feedback others give you. -
2024-10-19 at 6:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Yeah, that's not at all creepy or stalker vibed.
Fuck d00d you have no clue what your actions and words look like to others. It's no wonder you're socially awkward. You have no way of receiving or processing the feedback others give you.
Its stalking when you wont stop. I just wanted to ask a specific question which I wont go into.
approaching someone isn't stalking as long as I dont just show up at their door because I went out of my way like a creep to get their address and have a fixation on them. THATS STALKING, WEIRDO FUCK. -
2024-10-19 at 7:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by Far McFar Its stalking when you wont stop. I just wanted to ask a specific question which I wont go into.
approaching someone isn't stalking as long as I dont just show up at their door because I went out of my way like a creep to get their address and have a fixation on them. THATS STALKING, WEIRDO FUCK.
We've had a man on you for years, 24/7/365. -
2024-10-19 at 7:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by Far McFar Its stalking when you wont stop. I just wanted to ask a specific question which I wont go into.
approaching someone isn't stalking as long as I dont just show up at their door because I went out of my way like a creep to get their address and have a fixation on them. THATS STALKING, WEIRDO FUCK.
I'm sorry that you are being stalked and harassed on this platform of NIS/TOTSE we are a speech free forum free from all speech that might be free or open minded in any way, you are only allowed to spam and agree with the mainstream here unlike TikTok which is a real free speech platform which is why the AMERIKKKAN government is blocking it YOU FAT NIGGER THAT GETS HEALTH ADVICE FROM A 14 YEAR OLD CHILD!!!! HURRR I NEED TO CALL THE LOCAL DAYCARE BECAUSE I ATE TOO MANY DONUTS TODAY!! you tiktok zoomers are really fucked in the head
Originally posted by Alice Are you on TikTok?
If no, then you are in a bigger minority than even not using facebook as both the "liberty" patriot right wing and LGBT left are both on tiktok and consider it their home
Yet the government has a problem with this?
THEY TRYING TO SHUT DOWN THE RIGHT! THE LEFT! RIGHT LEFT RIGHT LEFT, well which is it? How about Tiktok has a model that goes against the American media model of making everything an argument, instead it just shows you an echo chamber i.e If you're right it shows you right wing, if gay it shows you gay shit. If you are suicidal it shows you self harm promotion ,etc
Problem, Americans?
your government sure seems to think so, communists! anti capitalists against COMPETITION
-
2024-10-19 at 8:55 PM UTC
-
2024-10-19 at 9:03 PM UTC
