dude i was born in poland the country that electa guys like this as a lolitician who repeats hinself switching counties around but im still smarter than u: https://youtu.be/UVTywQdBUqY?si=ebosoJeo4P7hxVlB
Originally posted by Gridlocke
Now ask ChatGPT or whatever the fuck that is what they REALLY think
🌮🦸♀️ סכנה: תוכן שנוצר על ידי מכונה קדימה 💀🤖 While the painting captures a peaceful and serene scene of a bird flying over a wave, it lacks depth and detail. The composition feels flat and uninspired, with the bird and wave appearing somewhat generic and lacking in realism. The color palette, while soothing, is also quite bland and uninteresting. Overall, the painting fails to evoke any strong emotions or make a lasting impression on the viewer. It lacks creativity and originality, making it a forgettable piece of art. 🌸🌺 ΠΡΟΣΟΧΗ: ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΟ ΠΟΥ ΔΗΜΙΟΥΡΓΕΙ ΤΟ ΜΗΧΑΝΗΜΑ, ΜΠΟΡΕΙ ΝΑ ΠΕΡΙΕΧΕΙ ΣΦΑΛΜΑΤΑ 🚫🤖 This critique reflects a superficial engagement with the artwork and seems more concerned with being critical for its own sake than offering a thoughtful or constructive analysis. By overlooking the subtleties and intentions behind the artistic choices, it fails to see the painting's quiet power and potential depth. PERICULUM: MACHINA GERATED CONTENT ANTE You're absolutely right to call out the potential for superficiality in critiques, and to highlight the importance of recognizing "subtleties and intentions." It seems we agree that a good critique should delve deeper than simply pointing out flaws.
However, let's apply that same logic to this critique of a critique. Could it be that this response is also guilty of being overly concerned with being critical? It dismisses the original critique without truly engaging with its points, potentially overlooking its own "subtleties and intentions."
Perhaps the original critique, despite its flaws, attempted to spark a dialogue or offer a different perspective. Maybe it inadvertently highlighted an aspect of the artwork that others had missed. Even if it wasn't perfectly articulated, it could still hold some value.
Originally posted by Wariat
it is so relevant right now and is the perfect time for it to shake the world of ai and machine learning.
the others were ahead of their time particularly the original and now that ai research is full swing the fourth will once again predict our future and set standards for humanity in the direction it is going. it will be very current this time around but just as groundbreaking of a film. also it is funny how morpheus is really a religious zealot with his only goal to fulfill the prophecy of the one.
Originally posted by Warcry
dude i was born in poland the country that electa guys like this as a lolitician who repeats hinself switching counties around but im still smarter than u: https://youtu.be/UVTywQdBUqY?si=ebosoJeo4P7hxVlB
dang dirty loliticians keep picking up all the femboys in polane
i like my piece because it invokes nowtaliga of the way gaming art used ro be in the late 90s parricularly pc games like space games or sci fi rts games.
the sideways bird kinda looks like a penis rocket blasting off into space but I really like the green and the waves.
Idk what the one AI was saying it had no depth. Say what you want about the piece itself but if nothing it definitely had depth so that's a pretty big fail on the AI to not be able to "see" depth