User Controls
Hiding Files in Images WITHOUT Steganography Software
-
2015-08-10 at 10:55 AM UTC
Y'all really need to keep this marital bitching in private. Stop fucking up threads. Please guys. Y'all may not like eachother, bu I've never seen reason to fully hate you guys. So just keep it to a minimum.
We're not even married. >:c(
p.s
Lanny, Psycho and tDR are the derailers here. -
2015-08-10 at 11:52 AM UTC
I'm ignoring you.
No, you have your head stuck in the sand hoping nobody will point out that that archaic code you posted is just some outdated jpeg shell code exploit published in a research paper at the SANS institute in Sep 2004 that has nothing to do with the OP's topic. You are the one who screwed the pooch ITT. I will not pretend to posess knowledge I do not in a useless attempt to impress people I have not nor never will meet. But there is a hidden message in the image I posted that you can't decode. In fact if you decode it I will never again shine the spotlight of truth on your truckload of bullshit. Not that it can't be spotted a mile away and upwind by anyone with a nose. -
2015-08-10 at 5:25 PM UTC
blah, blah, blaaaaahhh…
The goal was to hide a file inside a jpeg without using encryption. I provided a way. The fact that the exploit is patched only serves to secure the file even further; if someone runs the exploit code, they won't be able to retrieve the file. So if you run WINXP w/SP1 in a virtual machine, you can click on the .jpg, the .jpg will download the file, but if someone else clicks on the .jpg, nothing happens. The only real problem here is the rock-bottom shallowness of your imaginations and creativity, which is basically null. -
2015-08-10 at 6:38 PM UTC
Y'all really need to keep this marital bitching in private. Stop fucking up threads. Please guys. Y'all may not like eachother, bu I've never seen reason to fully hate you guys. So just keep it to a minimum.
c'mon, hewfil...this sort of thing has always gone with the territory. -
2015-08-11 at 3:16 AM UTC
The goal was to hide a file inside a jpeg without using encryption. I provided a way. The fact that the exploit is patched only serves to secure the file even further; if someone runs the exploit code, they won't be able to retrieve the file. So if you run WINXP w/SP1 in a virtual machine, you can click on the .jpg, the .jpg will download the file, but if someone else clicks on the .jpg, nothing happens. The only real problem here is the rock-bottom shallowness of your imaginations and creativity, which is basically null.
No you provided a jpg stack overflow exploit from Sep 04 whereby a malicious webmaster could call an executable hidden whose file path on his server could be downloaded from the host and executed on yhe client machine by editing the jpg header and exif info. This has not a dammned thing to do with communicating covertly between two cooperating parties via hidden messages in images. I am not nor never have I been inspired to be a programer but I skimmed enough of the research paper published by the SANS Institute to know you are a clueless bag of bullshit scented wind. -
2015-08-11 at 3:39 AM UTC
No you provided a jpg stack overflow exploit from Sep 04 whereby a malicious webmaster could call an executable hidden whose file path on his server could be downloaded from the host and executed on yhe client machine by editing the jpg header and exif info. This has not a dammned thing to do with communicating covertly between two cooperating parties via hidden messages in images. I am not nor never have I been inspired to be a programer but I skimmed enough of the research paper published by the SANS Institute to know you are a clueless bag of bullshit scented wind.
pwnd -
2015-08-11 at 3:56 AM UTCpwnd indeed
-
2015-08-11 at 1:10 PM UTCCome on now. You guys just can't acknowledge genius. That's all. You're all way too jealous for that.
-
2015-08-11 at 1:43 PM UTC
Come on now. You guys just can't acknowledge genius. That's all. You're all way too jealous for that.
While the line between genius and insanity is indeed thin you have been well past that line for years.Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
-
2015-08-11 at 3:41 PM UTC
-
2015-08-11 at 4:02 PM UTC
Come on now. You guys just can't acknowledge genius. That's all. You're all way too jealous for that.
You're the classic example of someone with the Dunning-Kruger effect. To take a line from my nigga' lock's playbook.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunnin...3Kruger_effect -
2015-08-11 at 4:13 PM UTC
You're the classic example of someone with the Dunning-Kruger effect. To take a line from my nigga' lock's playbook.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunnin...3Kruger_effect
Or I could just have been playing possum the entire time. -
2015-08-11 at 4:17 PM UTC
Or I could just have been playing possum the entire time.
-
2015-08-11 at 4:42 PM UTC
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28369097/how-does-the-jpeg-of-death-vulnerability-operate
The only thing posting that link does is show how poorly you understand the topic and the code you posted. -
2015-08-11 at 5 PM UTCMan oh, man. I'd feel pretty stupid if i were SpectraL right meow.
-
2015-08-11 at 5:14 PM UTC
The only thing posting that link does is show how poorly you understand the topic and the code you posted.
I just posted that link so people could find some interest in the way it works. It wasn't posted for any practical purpose, but simply to demonstrate how thinking outside the box can accomplish things which could not have been accomplished otherwise. It was purely educational. Isn't that the entire premise of a discussion - to create interest? Just because you're bland vanilla with Spock-like logic, and you like it that way, doesn't mean everyone else is. -
2015-08-11 at 5:37 PM UTC
I just posted that link so people could find some interest in the way it works. It wasn't posted for any practical purpose, but simply to demonstrate how thinking outside the box can accomplish things which could not have been accomplished otherwise. It was purely educational. Isn't that the entire premise of a discussion - to create interest? Just because you're bland vanilla with Spock-like logic, and you like it that way, doesn't mean everyone else is.
You know what pisses me off Spectral? I don't really give a shit that you're an uneducated fuck, i'm basically an uneducated fuck as well when it comes to IT. But the fact that you feel like you can just handwave Lanny's expertise away like this just goes to show your utter lack of respect for the actual work he's put in to get where he's at. How many fucking years did you go to college to get your degree in the relevant field faggot? -
2015-08-11 at 6:46 PM UTC
You know what pisses me off Spectral? I don't really give a shit that you're an uneducated fuck, i'm basically an uneducated fuck as well when it comes to IT. But the fact that you feel like you can just handwave Lanny's expertise away like this just goes to show your utter lack of respect for the actual work he's put in to get where he's at. How many fucking years did you go to college to get your degree in the relevant field faggot?
I just don't go around soapboxing my expertise, like others do. That doesn't mean I don't have it. And if I decided to use it, you wouldn't even know what hit you. Secrets. -
2015-08-11 at 6:53 PM UTCITT Spectral backpedals right into his own defecation as TDR leads him down yet another primrose path while Physco leads the applause and Lanny chuckles the quiet laugh of those who know.
-
2015-08-11 at 7:33 PM UTC
I just don't go around soapboxing my expertise, like others do. That doesn't mean I don't have it. And if I decided to use it, you wouldn't even know what hit you. Secrets.
You don't have any fucking expertise as we have long since established, also you're missing the point entirely you big oaf.
