Best Camouflage?

1. 2024-09-01 at 4:09 PM UTC

   #1
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
   Idk where else to put this. It would have fit in weapons and combat.
   
   But what do you think is best? I think the Marine one was the first one to have digital camouflage in forest colors but compared to other ones like the Russian one (idk if they have more but the dark green one) and CADPAT it sucks. I think those are the best ones for the Eastern half of North America and probably any forest/jungle. I think hunting patterns suck pretty bad too but deer are stupid so it probably doesn't matter. It's hard to not kill them in a fucking car.
2. 2024-09-01 at 4:12 PM UTC

   #2
   Charles Ex Machina Space Nigga
   theres a youtube channel called 'uniform history'.
   
   a must subscribe if yiur interested in dressing tactically.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • Cowboy2013
3. 2024-09-01 at 4:15 PM UTC

   #3
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina theres a youtube channel called 'uniform history'.
   
   a must subscribe if yiur interested in dressing tactically.

   
   Always bro
4. 2024-09-01 at 4:18 PM UTC

   #4
   Charles Ex Machina Space Nigga

   Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Always bro

   
   do you collect camos.
5. 2024-09-01 at 4:19 PM UTC

   #5
   

   Fluttershy Short Bussy
   /k/ used to always have autistic retards arguing about camo patterns and uniforms from different eras. It was a simpler time.
6. 2024-09-01 at 4:37 PM UTC

   #6
   Kafka sweaty
   Depends where the camo is for. In Belfast anything from Primark, lots of beige.
7. 2024-09-01 at 4:45 PM UTC

   #7
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina do you collect camos.

   
   I was kinda joking. But I am interested in it. The Russian and Canadian one may not be as good when the leaves fall? The marine one might compare better then.
   
   
   
   

   Originally posted by Fluttershy /k/ used to always have autistic retards arguing about camo patterns and uniforms from different eras. It was a simpler time.

   
   This was on reddit?
   
   
   
   

   Originally posted by Kafka Depends where the camo is for. In Belfast anything from Primark, lots of beige.

   
   Yes but why would beige be good in Ireland?
8. 2024-09-01 at 4:46 PM UTC

   #8
   Kafka sweaty

   Originally posted by Cowboy2013 I was kinda joking. But I am interested in it. The Russian and Canadian one may not be as good when the leaves fall? The marine one might compare better then.
   
   
   
   
   
   This was on reddit?
   
   
   
   
   
   Yes but why would beige be good in Ireland?

   
   Beige is the new black when it comes to fleeing the scene of a crime.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • Cowboy2013
9. 2024-09-01 at 5:24 PM UTC

   #9
   

   Bradley Florida Man
   Being african american really helps for North American night environments. Also the Gillie suit, with its latuce woven outerlayer that can easily have natural foliage webbed through it. The gillie suit ina nuetral colour to the environment (Tan in Fall), White (winter) and green (spring/summer) is extremely advantageous for anything where there is foliage because of the utilization of a suit essentially made form material in the environment that further hides the dimensions of the body and conceals traditional posturing during movement.
10. 2024-09-01 at 5:25 PM UTC

    #10
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    the best camouflage which is not touched on at all int he OP is MossyOak for the northern temperate environments where I come from (Wisconsin) and related areas of Canada, the Midwest, and the North East.
    
    Also remaining motionless.
11. 2024-09-01 at 5:49 PM UTC

    #11
    

    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
12. 2024-09-01 at 6:30 PM UTC

    #12
    

    ner vegas African Astronaut

    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 This was on reddit?

    
    4chan weapons board, now it's mostly just 'ex' spooks shilling for israel/Ukraine
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • Cowboy2013
13. 2024-09-01 at 8:52 PM UTC

    #13
    

    Fluttershy Short Bussy

    Originally posted by ner vegas 4chan weapons board, now it's mostly just 'ex' spooks shilling for israel/Ukraine

    
    Yeah but back in the day it was filled with Travis Bickle sympathizers and you could say nigger without the thread being shoah’d.
    My favorite was the gangster general where autists and retards alike would post photos of their favorite ghettoblasters and niggers from around the world, usually with a humorous caption
14. 2024-09-01 at 10:50 PM UTC

    #14
    Charles Ex Machina Space Nigga

    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 I was kinda joking. But I am interested in it. The Russian and Canadian one may not be as good when the leaves fall? The marine one might compare better then.

    
    look at what ukrainians are wearing throughout the season and theres your answer,
    
    also the best camo is ones skin color.
    
    if you have black skin in the west and commited a crime, no media can identify you until after the police did.
15. 2024-09-01 at 10:52 PM UTC

    #15
    Charles Ex Machina Space Nigga

    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood

    
    post heavily camouflaged men in womens sports
16. 2024-09-02 at 12:21 AM UTC

    #16
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, tooIt takes 1,850 gallons of water to
17. 2024-09-02 at 11:42 AM UTC

    #17
    Cowboy2013 African Astronaut

    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina look at what ukrainians are wearing throughout the season and theres your answer,
    
    also the best camo is ones skin color.
    
    if you have black skin in the west and commited a crime, no media can identify you until after the police did.

    
    Ukrainian camouflage looks like the Russian one but lighter right?
    
    I feel like the best summer camouflage would be all green with a little black. I think brown should only be in it when you have dead leaves.
18. 2024-09-02 at 11:57 AM UTC

    #18
    

    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    MARPAT
    
    /thread
19. 2024-09-03 at 10:37 PM UTC

    #19
    Charles Ex Machina Space Nigga

    Originally posted by Speedy Parker STOLEN CADPAT
    
    /thread

20. 2024-09-03 at 11:26 PM UTC

    #20
    

    Enigma African Astronaut [memorize my carmelite sway]
    Have you tried the covid mask + hoodie
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • Cowboy2013