Does anyone wish humanity would end?

1. 2024-09-01 at 9:33 PM UTC

   #21
   

   Fluttershy Short Bussy

   Originally posted by shitty titty I answered your question. You’re just retarded.

   
   You answered nothing. You just said “you’re wrong” then refused to elaborate like a 9 year old sticking their fingers in their ears and going “lalala I’m not listening”
2. 2024-09-01 at 9:34 PM UTC

   #22
   

   jedi_darryl African Astronaut
   I wish humanity would begin, but I kinda love indulging into psychedelics with all the nonsense goings on.
3. 2024-09-01 at 9:36 PM UTC

   #23
   

   shitty titty Cripple Nipple

   Originally posted by Fluttershy You answered nothing. You just said “you’re wrong” then refused to elaborate like a 9 year old sticking their fingers in their ears and going “lalala I’m not listening”

   
   Well my name is lala so that’s what I do.
   
   But sorry yes I did explain and you are confused.
4. 2024-09-01 at 9:39 PM UTC

   #24
   

   Fluttershy Short Bussy

   Originally posted by shitty titty Well my name is lala so that’s what I do.
   
   But sorry yes I did explain and you are confused.

   You are mistaken. I hope your head injury heals soon and that a black man violently rapes you in your apartment tonight.
5. 2024-09-01 at 9:40 PM UTC

   #25
   

   shitty titty Cripple Nipple

   Originally posted by Fluttershy You are mistaken. I hope your head injury heals soon and that a black man violently rapes you in your apartment tonight.

   
   You’re easy to anger lol.
   
   I don’t have an apartment so make sure you send him to the right place.
6. 2024-09-01 at 9:41 PM UTC

   #26
   Warcry Certified lover boy

   Originally posted by shitty titty Women didn’t create those laws lol

   
   what about how it was in victoian rimea tho and the las od men since dinosaur times?
7. 2024-09-01 at 9:43 PM UTC

   #27
   Warcry Certified lover boy
   https://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/may/24/childrensservices.guardiansocietysupplement%0A%0A%E2%80%9E%20In%201848,%20it%20was%20claimed%20that%20almost%202,700%20girls%20in%20London%20between%20the%20ages%20of%2011%20and%2016%20were%20hospitalised%20because%20of%20venereal%20disease,%20many%20as%20a%20result%20of%20prosti%20tution.%20In%201875,%20the%20age%20of%20consent,%20which%20had%20remained%20at%2012%20since%201285,%20was%20raised%20to%2013,%20partly%20as%20a%20result%20of%20concerns%20about%20child%20prostitution.%0A%0ABut%20concern%20continued%20and,%20in%201881,%20a%20select%20committee,%20set%20up%20to%20investigate%20the%20issue,%20reported%20that%20child%20prostitution%20was%20rampant.%20One%20police%20officer%20told%20the%20committee%20that,%20in%20London,%20children%20above%20the%20age%20of%2013%20could%20be%20procured%20%22without%20any%20difficulty%20whatsoever%22.%20Another%20spoke%20of%20how%20it%20was%20%22scarcely%20possible%20for%20anyone%20between%20nine%20o'clock%20in%20the%20evening,%20and%20one%20o'clock%20in%20the%20morning%20to%20walk%20along%20Pentonville%20Road%20without%20being%20accosted%20by%20about%20a%20dozen%20young%20girls%20between%2013%20and%2014%20years%20of%20age%22.%0A%0AThe%20famous%20editor%20of%20the%20Pall%20Mall%20Gazette,%20William%20Stead,%20launched%20an%20investigative%20campaign%20to%20uncover%20the%20extent%20of%20child%20prostitution%20by%20visiting%20brothels,%20and%20actually%20bought%20a%20child%20prostitute%20for%20himself%20to%20expose%20the%20double%20standards%20of%20the%20Victorian%20public.%20Stead%20was%20a%20brilliant%20publicist%20and%20before%20long%20the%20country%20was%20in%20uproar.%20A%20mass%20demonstration%20of%20250,000%20people%20converged%20on%20Trafalgar%20Square%20to%20demand%20an%20increase%20in%20the%20age%20of%20consent.%20In%201885,%20the%20Criminal%20Law%20Amendment%20Act%20was%20passed,%20raising%20the%20age%20of%20consent%20to%2016.%0A%0AYet%20exactly%20a%20century%20later,%20in%201985,%20when%20The%20Children's%20Society%20opened%20Britain's%20first%20refuge%20for%20child%20runaways,%20we%20found%20that%20chil%20dren%20were%20still%20selling%20themselves%20on%20the%20streets%20to%20get%20money%20for%20food%20and%20shelter.%0A%0AThrough%20our%20work%20with%20child%20runaways%20and%20in%20our%20research,%20we%20found%20that%20this%20appalling%20form%20of%20abuse%20is%20often%20accompanied%20by%20sickening%20violence,%20drug%20abuse%20and%20horrendous%20risk%20to%20health%20and%20life.%0A%0AMelanie,%20a%20girl%20we%20interviewed%20in%20our%20report,%20One%20Way%20Street,%20told%20us%20that%20she%20was%20abused%20from%20the%20age%20of%20three%20by%20her%20brother,%20followed%20at%20the%20age%20of%20five%20by%20her%20godfather%20and%20later%20by%20his%20friend.%20They%20gave%20her%20money%20for%20sweets.%20%22You%20could%20say%20I've%20been%20a%20prostitute%20since%20the%20age%20of%20seven,%22%20she%20told%20us.%0A%0ALouise%20had%20been%20involved%20in%20prostitution%20from%20the%20age%20of%2011%20to%20get%20money%20to%20buy%20food%20for%20herself%20and%20her%20younger%20siblings%20because%20her%20alcoholic,%20violent%20mother%20spent%20all%20of%20her%20money%20on%20drink.%0A%0ATheir%20stories%20had%20a%20common%20theme%20-%20family%20conflict%20overlapping%20with%20drugs,%20violence%20and%20poverty.%20For%20many,%20the%20transition%20from%20being%20abused%20in%20the%20home%20to%20being%20abused%20on%20the%20street%20was%20seamless.%E2%80%9D
8. 2024-09-01 at 9:43 PM UTC

   #28
   Warcry Certified lover boy
   https://niggasin.space/post/1969404
9. 2024-09-01 at 9:46 PM UTC

   #29
   

   Fluttershy Short Bussy

   Originally posted by shitty titty You’re easy to anger lol.
   
   I don’t have an apartment so make sure you send him to the right place.

   
   There is no apartment. There is no black man. It was a stranger talking shit on the internet. Are you retarded or something?
10. 2024-09-01 at 9:46 PM UTC

    #30
    

    Fluttershy Short Bussy

    Originally posted by Warcry what about how it was in victoian rimea tho and the las od men since dinosaur times?

    
    Yeah what about that?!?!?!!
11. 2024-09-01 at 10:19 PM UTC

    #31
    

    shitty titty Cripple Nipple

    Originally posted by Fluttershy There is no apartment. There is no black man. It was a stranger talking shit on the internet. Are you retarded or something?

    
    Oh that’s so disappointing. I was looking forward to a good time.
12. 2024-09-01 at 10:24 PM UTC

    #32
    Kafka sweaty

    Originally posted by Fluttershy No, they were just easily manipulated to vote for people that would create them…

    
    Don't blame women if a party says they can only have their human rights if they vote for some evil, that they can't just have their rights.
13. 2024-09-01 at 10:30 PM UTC

    #33
    Kafka sweaty
    Women aren't given the option to vote for their rights without having to vote for something detrimental as well, and this is done on purpose to stir up hatred between the sexes. A good example of this is the recent Ireland referendum, women couldn't vote to remove sexist language from the constitution without also voting for the government to stop caring for disabled people.
14. 2024-09-01 at 10:40 PM UTC

    #34
    Kafka sweaty
    "In the second referendum, the proposal was to replace article 41.2, an outdated, largely inoperative and, for many, offensively sexist clause around mothers’ “duties in the home” with a new clause. The proposal recognised that family members provide care for one another regardless of gender, but appeared to let the state off the hook.
    
    That referendum was preceded by a thoughtful and thought-provoking citizen’s assembly on gender equality whose recommendations were ignored by government. The government’s proposal went down in flames by a historically high “no” margin of 73.9% to 26.1%.
    
    But the notion that this drubbing is, as some campaigners claim, a victory for motherhood in general, or stay-at-home mothers in particular – let alone carers and people with disabilities, whose voices were largely ignored in the referendums – is misleading.
    
    Had there been a proposal merely to remove the offensive women in the home provision, it would probably have been consigned to history where it belongs. Instead, many women, including close friends and contemporaries, were placed in the invidious position of voting to retain the clause in order to express their contempt for the care amendment. The irony will not be lost on women, who make up 98% of full-time carers and 80% of paid care workers in Ireland."
15. 2024-09-01 at 10:51 PM UTC

    #35
    Kafka sweaty
    I can't believe how backward people still are.
16. 2024-09-01 at 10:52 PM UTC

    #36
    Kafka sweaty
    I think I was put on this earth to burn misogynists at the stake.
17. 2024-09-01 at 11:41 PM UTC

    #37
    

    Fluttershy Short Bussy

    Originally posted by Kafka I think I was put on this earth to burn misogynists at the stake.

    
    You’re not supposed to burn the steak you dumb cunt. I said medium rare. And bring me another Miller Light!
18. 2024-09-01 at 11:51 PM UTC

    #38
    Dirtbag African Astronaut

    Originally posted by Fluttershy You’re not supposed to burn the steak you dumb cunt. I said medium rare. And bring me another Miller Light!

    
    You'll be the steak
19. 2024-09-01 at 11:56 PM UTC

    #39
    

    Fluttershy Short Bussy

    Originally posted by Dirtbag You'll be the steak

    
    I’m quaking in my boots
    Damn that was a good orgasm
20. 2024-09-02 at 12:15 AM UTC

    #40
    

    Bradley Florida Man
    It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too. It takes 1,850 gallons of water to produce 1 pound of beef, but only 1 gallon for crickets!Looks like they're thirsty, too.