User Controls

The government should deliver food

  1. #1
    Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
    Instead of people having to go to the store to spend their EBT maybe have the government work something out with Elon to have smart cars deliver three meals a day, maybe to include their choice of goyslop? It's not like they have anything better to spend it on. People would be a lot happier to see Tesla's then.

    The only downside to this is that they couldn't loan out their EBT cards for fentanyl.
  2. #2
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    And how do you plan to pay for this?

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. #3
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Instead of people having to go to the store to spend their EBT maybe have the government work something out with Elon to have smart cars deliver three meals a day, maybe to include their choice of goyslop? It's not like they have anything better to spend it on. People would be a lot happier to see Tesla's then.

    The only downside to this is that they couldn't loan out their EBT cards for fentanyl.

    You're a bum
  4. #4
    For most people on welfare grocery shopping is their only reason to leave the house. Same thing during covid - grocery shopping was one of the few permitted activities during lockdown. Grocery shops are unappreciated in their social significance.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. #5
    blackbird Tuskegee Airman
    The pandemic made me realize how dystopian a society where nobody leaves their house would be. It actually snapped me out of my hikkikomori tendencies alot.
  6. #6
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Donald Trump For most people on welfare grocery shopping is their only reason to leave the house. Same thing during covid - grocery shopping was one of the few permitted activities during lockdown. Grocery shops are unappreciated in their social significance.

    You're not a bum.
  7. #7
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Donald Trump For most people on welfare grocery shopping is their only reason to leave the house. Same thing during covid - grocery shopping was one of the few permitted activities during lockdown. Grocery shops are unappreciated in their social significance.
    Originally posted by blackbird The pandemic made me realize how dystopian a society where nobody leaves their house would be. It actually snapped me out of my hikkikomori tendencies alot.

    I still buy my groceries from Amazon and dollar stores. Every grocery store in my area makes you take off your backpack to be allowed in the store. They can all suffer and die. I will eat canned chicken, ramen and only buy packaged beef from a locally owned butcher once a month.

    Covid taught me that society is evil, the supply chains are evil, capitalism is evil, politics are evil. Covid was a blessing that stressed the weak system and showed the only way forward is to break what can be broken

    Corona-Chan please bless us with your sweet kiss again and mutate into something more powerful and purifying that will cleanse humanity for good this time.
  8. #8
    Corona chan turned out to be a fickle asian thot.
  9. #9
    Those on EBT should be turned INTO food to feed the illegals crossing the border.

    Ala soilent green.
  10. #10
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    It ised to be you could buy unprepared food only with food stamps. Now you see nogs buying everything but beer and smokes. Food stamps should be for food only, not big macs, paper towels, and twizzlers.
  11. #11
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker It ised to be you could buy unprepared food only with food stamps. Now you see nogs buying everything but beer and smokes. Food stamps should be for food only, not big macs, paper towels, and twizzlers.

    Restricting SNAP benefits to certain products or stores would disrupt the economies of scale, likely driving up prices and increasing the overall cost of the program.
  12. #12
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Restricting SNAP benefits to certain products or stores would disrupt the economies of scale, likely driving up prices and increasing the overall cost of the program.

    Bullshit.
  13. #13
    Fluttershy Short Bussy
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Restricting SNAP benefits to certain products or stores would disrupt the economies of scale, likely driving up prices and increasing the overall cost of the program.
    If we don’t let niggers buy toilet paper with their food stamps they won’t buy toilet paper at all. What a shocking economic revelation.
  14. #14
    the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    http://www.georgewythereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Fall_2016_Hoopai.pdf
    parameters of SNAP benefits. However, like these other states, New York was denied
    this request by the USDA. New York’s attempt to limit the consumption of unhealthy
    drinks is not unprecedented, as SNAP already prohibits benefits from being used to
    obtain harmful substances (e.g. tobacco and alcohol) (Shenkin and Jacobson, 2010).
    However, as Shenkin and Jacobson point out, there are some crucial differences
    between the two efforts to discourage unhealthy consumption. Manufacturers of
    soda and sugary drinks would most likely lobby, to great effect, against the exclusion
    of sugary drinks from SNAP benefits, just as they lobbied against the soda excise
    tax in 2009. Economists argue that a SNAP restriction on sugary drinks would have
    little effect. Recipients could easily use the cash they have on hand to buy sugary
    drinks, due to its low cost compared to alcohol or tobacco. Additionally, grocery
    stores may argue that separating eligible and non-eligible SNAP products would
    prove costly and inconvenient.
    Shenkin and Jacobson, for their part, offer a solution to mitigate soda and
    sugary beverage consumption. This solution, which may prove more palatable to
    the soda industry and grocery stores, adds a given amount, such as 30 cents, back to
    the EBT account for every SNAP dollar used to purchase healthier foods. Behavioral
    economists Michael Richards and Jody Sindelar also recommend a “rewards system,”
    contingent upon the recipient’s choice to buy healthy foods, like fruits or vegetables
    (Richards and Sindelar, 2013). In addition to this proposal, they also suggest that
    SNAP recipients win “prizes” based on whether or not their purchases are healthy.
    This would simplify the purchasing process.
    This was kinda funny

    If you want to apply for SNAP folx remember to fax in your application, don't use the online portal.
  15. #15
    Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood And how do you plan to pay for this?


    Cut back on bombs being sent to the Chosen?

    This would probably require our politicians to cut back on the underaged p/bunani too though. So ig it is a pie in the sky type of thing.
  16. #16
    Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You're a bum

    Ok boomer...

    But with every bomb that gets dropped on Palestine it just goes to show our government needs better things to spend money on. I use the same logic on reparations, especially if standards for blackness/ex-slave status will be really loose. Even if I wouldn't benefit personally I still think Uncle Scam needs to pay up. Idk how much but it won't be cheap.
  17. #17
    Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Cut back on bombs being sent to the Chosen?

    So Bernie probably couldn't get behind the idea 🫤
  18. #18
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Ok boomer…

    But with every bomb that gets dropped on Palestine it just goes to show our government needs better things to spend money on. I use the same logic on reparations, especially if standards for blackness/ex-slave status will be really loose. Even if I wouldn't benefit personally I still think Uncle Scam needs to pay up. Idk how much but it won't be cheap.

    Bum, free loading bum...
Jump to Top