User Controls
There is no climate emergency
-
2024-08-08 at 10:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump 8 billion volcanoes.
Look around. The whole world right now is covered with powerplants and runways (as well as roads, factories, homes and offices that need to be heated, farms, etc). Not to mention volcanoes, all farting and blowing into the atmosphere and burning stuff.
We're above 400ppm right now, but looking at previous time periods in Earth's past is the correct approach to predicting the future.
What caused the massive 400 then dumbass? -
2024-08-08 at 10:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump 8 billion volcanoes.
Look around. The whole world right now is covered with powerplants and runways (as well as roads, factories, homes and offices that need to be heated, farms, etc). Not to mention volcanoes, all farting and blowing into the atmosphere and burning stuff.
yea but if you look at this world from googlemap theres limitless acres of greeneries ans just pure jungle, -
2024-08-08 at 10:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker What caused the massive 400 then dumbass?
Well we dug up a lot of oil and coal and burned it. Carbon reacting with atmospheric oxygen. C + O2 = heat + CO2.
Maybe that has something to do with it?
Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina yea but if you look at this world from googlemap theres limitless acres of greeneries ans just pure jungle,
That's just grass and managed forest.
There are basically no jungles left. Everywhere you go there are people, cutting down trees and using the wood. Even the most jungly bits of Africa are crawling with volcanoes. -
2024-08-08 at 10:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump Well we dug up a lot of oil and coal and burned it. Carbon reacting with atmospheric oxygen. C + O2 = heat + CO2.
Maybe that has something to do with it?
That's just grass and managed forest.
There are basically no jungles left. Everywhere you go there are people, cutting down trees and using the wood. Even the most jungly bits of Africa are crawling with volcanoes.
your not looking at the right place.
and even if your claim is true, measuring temperature and co2 level in these parts would still be coolwr and more oxygenated than in the city center or by the highway. -
2024-08-08 at 10:51 PM UTC
-
2024-08-08 at 10:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Im talking about then not now dumbass. Then, you know , between 2.6 and 5.3 million years ago.
Good question. Anytime you see CO2 spiking like that I imagine it implies that a lot of carbon which was in the ground or in the ocean got into the atmosphere some way. I don't know more than that. -
2024-08-08 at 11:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina your not looking at the right place.
and even if your claim is true, measuring temperature and co2 level in these parts would still be coolwr and more oxygenated than in the city center or by the highway.
Vinny you admit that human activity emits CO2 and CO2 is a factor we need to be aware of.
I am proud of you. -
2024-08-09 at 12:26 AM UTC
-
2024-08-09 at 12:27 AM UTC
-
2024-08-09 at 12:29 AM UTC
-
2024-08-09 at 12:30 AM UTC
-
2024-08-09 at 3:13 AM UTC
-
2024-08-09 at 12:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump
What's responsible for the massive jump in CO2 in the atmosphere over the past 200 years?
"records indicate that atmospheric CO2 rose from ~420 p.p.m.v. in the Triassic period (about 200 million years ago) to a peak of ~1,130 p.p.m.v. in the Middle Cretaceous (about 100 million years ago). "
current 21st century CO2 content:
416 p.p.m.v
Get the fuck oudda here... -
2024-08-09 at 1:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson "records indicate that atmospheric CO2 rose from ~420 p.p.m.v. in the Triassic period (about 200 million years ago) to a peak of ~1,130 p.p.m.v. in the Middle Cretaceous (about 100 million years ago). "
current 21st century CO2 content:
416 p.p.m.v
Get the fuck oudda here…
100 million years is a long time, is it not? That's 1 ppm increase every 100,000 years.
How much is CO2 currently rising per year? -
2024-08-09 at 1:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump Vinny you admit that human activity emits CO2 and CO2 is a factor we need to be aware of.
I am proud of you.
i have never been in denial about that, the question is really about do we, as humans, in our lifetime and over the generations emitted more co2 than the nature can handle to the point that it "changes" or having an effect on the way our climate functions.
we know as a matter of fact that just one, I REPEAT; ONE volcanoe explosion emits more co2 and other "green house" gasses than humanity have produced from burning fossil fuels since liquid hydrocarbon was discovered by jéws in ancient egypt.
are we really producing more co2 than all the trees and weeds and algae in the world can absorb ?
really ?
show me the science. -
2024-08-09 at 1:10 PM UTC
-
2024-08-09 at 1:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina i have never been in denial about that, the question is really about do we, as humans, in our lifetime and over the generations emitted more co2 than the nature can handle to the point that it "changes" or having an effect on the way our climate functions.
The answer is yes.we know as a matter of fact that just one, I REPEAT; ONE volcanoe explosion emits more co2 and other "green house" gasses than humanity have produced from burning fossil fuels since liquid hydrocarbon was discovered by jéws in ancient egypt.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/736161
Volcanoes emit CO2, but the levels are small. About the same as the UK's annual emissions.are we really producing more co2 than all the trees and weeds and algae in the world can absorb ?
Yes, by several orders of magnitute. An alternative way of thinking of it is does earth produce enough trees, weeds and algae to fulfill the fuel needs of humanity? And the answer is very much no.
Look at North Korea as an example. Since they don't import that much oil, they have cut down most of the trees in order to heat their houses and cook. This means the landscape looks different to South Korea. Old pictures from Ireland show a similar pattern, not too many mature trees. Humanity's needs outstrip what the planet can provide by several times.
So not only is the amount of carbon caught up in plants much smaller the amount emitted, but most of the carbon caught up in plants is simply re-emitted into the atmosphere anyway when the plant dies. Long term carbon sequestration (as in coal deposits) is the exception, not the rule. -
2024-08-09 at 1:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump 100 million years is a long time, is it not? That's 1 ppm increase every 100,000 years.
How much is CO2 currently rising per year?
Um no...100 million years is NOT a long time ago given the Earth is 4.5 Billion years old..."conveniently" measuring a period of only 200 or 300 years is like taking a 10th of a second out of a day and using it as representative of the entire day.
How quickly it rises isn't indicative of a long term problem...as previously mentioned life was MORE abundant on Earth during the periods mentioned...life will not only be fine at higher CO2 content or higher temps but it will THRIVE...as demonstrated by the history of life on Earth...(not the 10th of a second being cited). -
2024-08-09 at 1:32 PM UTCThis whole "climate change" bullshit is simply down to self absorbed humans worrying about themselves rather than the greater good for all life...and guess what the greater good for all life would be...
1...things warming up
2...humans dying off because they can't adapt -
2024-08-09 at 1:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump The answer is yes.
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/736161
Volcanoes emit CO2, but the levels are small. About the same as the UK's annual emissions.
Yes,Scientists quantify global volcanic CO2 venting; estimate total carbon on Earth
Scientists update estimates of Earth's immense interior carbon reservoirs, and how much carbon Deep Earth naturally swallows and exhales
is this what 'science' have been reduced to ..... mere cheap 'asstimate' prostitutes ?
scientists asstimate the globe warms .... read the headline.