2024-07-08 at 1:09 AM UTC
This has put me off marriage tbh. If I got married and there was a chance the law could change so you can't divorce then I don't want to risk that.
2024-07-08 at 1:11 AM UTC
Most men won't marry anyway. My experience is it's always the woman who asks for the marriage.
2024-07-08 at 1:12 AM UTC
It's gonna be like that movie The Village. If one generation is cut off from education they'll go back to the dark ages.
2024-07-08 at 1:14 AM UTC
I think I'll just have a fake wedding or a photoshoot at least. Maybe a handfasting ceremony since they aren't recognised legally.
2024-07-08 at 1:15 AM UTC
Enigma
African Astronaut
[memorize my carmelite sway]
Soon they're gonna make it illegal to not be gay or at least transgender non binary polyqueer and then all you bigots will be begging me to sign your cock polisher licenses (proving you are a good cock polisher) and I'll do it but you gotta do something for me first.
2024-07-08 at 2:01 AM UTC
Enigma
African Astronaut
[memorize my carmelite sway]
did this happen today or something?
2024-07-08 at 2:28 AM UTC
I wonder what would happen if mothers started neglecting their sons. It seems like misogynists had mothers that did everything for them.
2024-07-08 at 2:43 AM UTC
I don't want the troubles to start up again but am curious if it would prevent asylum seekers from being able to stay here.
2024-07-08 at 4:47 AM UTC
The Far left and their anti-traditional movement has destroyed the fabric of society as a whole. it simply works. its never been perfect but there is always some form of balance
look at the chaos especially with younger black people. they programmed that white males need to be eliminated. this is why I said people will fear young black males and other people of color because there now hitting their adult years and strongly believe the white race (especially White Males) were the fault of the downfalls in their existence which is just not true. I agree a wealth class aided in that but not Whites as a whole.
but this new left starting in the early 1970s pushed this agenda and over time, its replacing one corrupted force with a new.
its kind of a way to keep people preoccupied mentally and create chaos while they slowly shift power in their favor.
but there is only so much room at the top and they will turn on their own to achieve this goal
2024-07-08 at 4:49 AM UTC
The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in āadvancedā countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human being to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in āadvancedā countries.
ā ā The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
ā ā If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
ā ā We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We canāt predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
ā ā In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general. 7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, āpolitically correctā types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by āleftismā will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)
Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesnāt seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call āfeelings of inferiorityā and āover-socializationā. Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism as a whole; but this segment is highly influential.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2024-07-08 at 4:53 AM UTC
Did you just quote the unibomber?
2024-07-08 at 5:08 AM UTC
How come the Unibomber did pretty much the exact same thing as the Weather Underground group did but he died in prison and 2 presidents and one Govenor gave them pardons and a clemency?
its so blatantly favoritism. what Ted did was fucked up but didn't connect with the DNC apparently
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
