User Controls

AdBlock not working on Youtube?

  1. #21
    Enigma African Astronaut
    Of course the bad ad man wants you to watch the bad ads
  2. #22
    Originally posted by Narc I'm not paying for summing that adblock gives me for free. And just as with adblock anyway, YT premium isn't going to skip all the content providers own ads they're putting in more and more now. And getting more creative so as to make it harder to skip them too might I add.


    .

    It's $14 bucks...It's well worth if if you watch a lot of youtube...regardless of the creators adverts. "WISH I'D DONE IT YEARS AGO" - Satisfied, Houston TX.

    Plus you get to download videos for offline viewing as well as youtube music etc.
  3. #23
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Plus you get to download videos for offline viewing as well as youtube music etc.

    Me too

    https://www.yourvideofile.org/


    .
  4. #24
    Obviously there are ways to do it...but it's just easier to do it from within youtube itself...ad free for a measly $14. No extra apps required or problems they may bring...needed.

    It's just $14 which is nothing to me...price of a couple of coffees etc. I get that's not the case for everyone but if it is, it's a no brainer .
  5. #25
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    So you figured you'd come into a fred of people who use adblock to try and convince them to pay $14 for exactly the same as what they already get for nothing?

    Or are you just trying to say "hey everyone, look at me, I'm riiiich"?

    Wanker lol


    .
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. #26
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Personally I think paying $168 a year for fuck all you couldn't get easily for free makes you the biggest mug, no matter how much you got.


    .
  7. #27
    Originally posted by Narc Personally I think paying $168 a year for fuck all you couldn't get easily for free makes you the biggest mug, no matter how much you got.


    .

    Well it's not "fuck all", it's hours of entertainment. Sure you can get it for free but there is a certain amount of work involved in that.

    It's like arguing it's dumb to pay for internet when you can go sit in the library and use it for free...
  8. #28
    Charles Ex Machina African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No it's not like that at all.

    Though I do understand $14 is 2 weeks pay for you.



    imagine paying $14 to cope with ads.\\
  9. #29
    I see for many of you $14 is a significant amount
  10. #30
    Charles Ex Machina African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I see for many of you $14 is a significant amount

    to cope with ads.

    yes .
  11. #31
    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina to cope with ads.

    yes .

    I understand.
  12. #32
    Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well it's not "fuck all", it's hours of entertainment. Sure you can get it for free but there is a certain amount of work involved in that.

    It's like arguing it's dumb to pay for internet when you can go sit in the library and use it for free…

    Its the equivalent of being paid $168 a year for just 5 minutes of labour. That's a pretty good gig if you ask me.


    .
  13. #33
    Originally posted by Narc Its the equivalent of being paid $168 a year for just 5 minutes of labour. That's a pretty good gig if you ask me.


    .

    That assumes it keeps working...which this thread kind of underlines.
  14. #34
    I primarily watch youtube on my Roku TV...you can't install an ad blocker on that.
  15. #35
    Charles Ex Machina African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I understand.



    the pride of paying $14 a month to not see the ads that advertizers pay $0.00014 a month to make you see their ads and call it a winn.

    the cope.

  16. #36
    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina

    the pride of paying $14 a month to not see the ads that advertizers pay $0.00014 a month to make you see their ads and call it a winn.

    the cope.


    Pride? ...I'm forgetting it's Pride month.

    Again I understand $14 might be a significant outlay for you and others , for me it's a "throwaway amount". I give more than that to the homeless guy I see regularly on my commute home...and he offers no services.
  17. #37
    Charles Ex Machina African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Pride? …I'm forgetting it's Pride month.

    Again I understand $14 might be a significant outlay for you and others , for me it's a "throwaway amount". I give more than that to the homeless guy I see regularly on my commute home…and he offers no services.

    im sure cope is a service.
  18. #38
    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina im sure cope is a service.

    Are you getting paid to use the word "cope" today?
  19. #39
    Charles Ex Machina African Astronaut
    yes and you would have to pay $14 to not see it if you cant cope.
  20. #40
    Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina yes and you would have to pay $14 to not see it if you cant cope.

    I don't mind dealing with your cope though.

Jump to Top