2024-05-28 at 5:01 PM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2024-05-28 at 5:09 PM UTC
Guy is a tank though. Absolute unit.
2024-05-28 at 7:06 PM UTC
I've had a gang of bears do that one time.
2024-05-29 at 5:38 AM UTC
Narc
Naturally Camouflaged
[connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
I've had a gang of bears do that one time.
I bet you have an all
.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2024-05-29 at 5:03 PM UTC
Big, buff, fat guys go down the fastest. Within just a minute they're huffing and puffing and can hardly throw a punch. It's pretty comical. I can knock them out cold within three minutes or less.
2024-05-29 at 11:43 PM UTC
Kinks
Actually pretty straight
[bitch the twenty-second stewpan]
easy, she already thinks I hate her
2024-05-29 at 11:52 PM UTC
Window of vulnerability
The time from when a software exploit first becomes active to the time when the number of vulnerable systems shrinks to insignificance is known as the window of vulnerability. The timeline for each software vulnerability is defined by the following main events:
t0: The vulnerability is discovered (by anyone).
t1a: A security patch is published (e.g., by the software vendor).
t1b: An exploit becomes active.
t2: Most vulnerable systems have applied the patch.
Thus the formula for the length of the window of vulnerability is: t2 − t1b.
In this formulation, it is always true that t0 ≤ t1a, and t0 ≤ t1b. Note that t0 is not the same as day zero. For example, if a hacker is the first to discover (at t0) the vulnerability, the vendor might not learn of it until much later (on day zero).
For normal vulnerabilities, t1b > t1a. This implies that the software vendor was aware of the vulnerability and had time to publish a security patch (t1a) before any hacker could craft a workable exploit (t1b). For zero-day exploits, t1b ≤ t1a, such that the exploit becomes active before a patch is made available.
By not disclosing known vulnerabilities, a software vendor hopes to reach t2 before t1b is reached, thus avoiding any exploits. However, the vendor has no guarantees that hackers will not find vulnerabilities on their own. Furthermore, hackers can analyze the security patches themselves, and thereby discover the underlying vulnerabilities and automatically generate working exploits. These exploits can be used effectively up until time t2.
In practice, the length of the window of vulnerability varies between systems, vendors, and individual vulnerabilities. It is often measured in days, with one report from 2006 estimating the average as 28 days.
2024-05-30 at 12:05 AM UTC
Kinks
Actually pretty straight
[bitch the twenty-second stewpan]
HOW FASCINATING will this be how we work my schedule
