User Controls
Is Elon Musk a real person
-
2024-05-13 at 4:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cowboy2013 So nationalize them.
Or don't?
Tiktok is not nationalized because that would be retarded. You can't nationalize anything and participate in the free market, you just get sidelined to the third world economies that nobody cares about like Russia, Cuba or Venezuela who have nationalized oil and gas and all buy/sell to each other
Saudi Arabia can only get away with it because they have a global monopoly but that's not the same case for the American export of CULTURE and global internet platforms. So is every country supposed to have it's own bureau to deal with Facebook? or maybe just pull the plug on all of that shit. The 90s seemed to do perfectly fine without it. -
2024-05-13 at 5:42 PM UTCPlenty of jelly in that sandwich you got there?
. -
2024-05-13 at 6:04 PM UTCFor all the Elon fanboys I would post that pic of him and Ghislaine Maxwell but him being a pedo would just be a selling point here 🫤
In related news the German people are looking to uncuck themselves from Uncle Scam:
And I guarantee Greta Thunberg won't say a word about it because she's controlled opposition. She's only an environmentalist when it's in the interests of Western governments. -
2024-05-13 at 6:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Infinityshockrates He's not censoring them on twitter though. Is any admin that bans anyone for any reason like SPAMMING a Nazi? Is Lanny just as bad as Elon?
Or is there a difference between censoring someone because you don't like what they say and punishing someone for breaking agreed upon rules on a site you use as a privilege
I don’t know anything about the current situation, but what you just said is the exact same justification the last people used to censor people they don’t like. Lol. -
2024-05-13 at 6:07 PM UTCFor people saying it doesn't make sense since they're electric cars, yeah charged by burning coal. So save the trees. Any of those tree's life is worth more than Elon's imo.
-
2024-05-13 at 6:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cowboy2013 For people saying it doesn't make sense since they're electric cars, yeah charged by burning coal. So save the trees. Any of those tree's life is worth more than Elon's imo.
I like the concept of the electric car. In theory it’s in preparation for when fossil fuel bulk electric production is phased out. You can do both things at once, ramp up electric car production and related charging infrastructure, while also limiting coal use. Should be replaced with a mix of nuclear and geothermal with some solar and wind thrown in, for funsies.
I’m not in favor of banning gas burning vehicles though I think they’ll always have their place. I’m pretty sure electric cars are just better or will be once the technology improves more and the free market will shift people largely away from gas burners eventually anyway.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-05-13 at 6:28 PM UTCElon is a NIGGER from Africa
-
2024-05-13 at 7:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fawkes I don’t know anything about the current situation, but what you just said is the exact same justification the last people used to censor people they don’t like. Lol.
Just don't use their platform then. This is why nobody posts on newtotse. If what they are doing is against the wishes of every person they will cease to exist and be replaced by something the market actually wants
Originally posted by Cowboy2013 For people saying it doesn't make sense since they're electric cars, yeah charged by burning coal. So save the trees. Any of those tree's life is worth more than Elon's imo.
this is dumb just like people that say bitcoin is bad for the environment because it uses a lot of energy. But what if you got all that energy from solar? Then it would be 100% clean. -
2024-05-13 at 7:25 PM UTCElon Musk is a CIA cardboard cutout. Unlimited funding from the federal government right from day one. Codenamed "Lone Smuk". If you think you can trust him, you got another thing coming.
-
2024-05-13 at 7:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Infinityshockrates Just don't use their platform then. This is why nobody posts on newtotse. If what they are doing is against the wishes of every person they will cease to exist and be replaced by something the market actually wants
Yep that’s the exact counter argument the censors used. Hey if you don’t like our massive platform that is one of only two or three of the main ones, you can use one of those other two or three that have the exact same censorship rules!!! Or else you can use some obscure bullshit that has ten users and nobody cares about!! We’re a private business so we can do whatever the fuck we want you just have to deal with it! -
2024-05-13 at 7:44 PM UTCFree market only works when it’s actually free, when the powerful interests collaborate to fuck you there’s really nothing you can do about it
-
2024-05-13 at 7:56 PM UTCThe problem with unregulated social media sites is that they are unregulated. Lanny takes on all the liability. For example, let's say there's a 12-year-old on here. Lanny has no age requirements. And let's say someone posts pornographic content and the 12-year-old sees it. That's right there is a felony, at both the state and federal level. When they come, they'll force Lanny to hand over all the IPs involved, and he'll be gagged with a non-disclosure.
-
2024-05-13 at 10:02 PM UTCBURN IT ALL DOWN
A DIFFERENT RACE DESERVES A BETTER CHANCEThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-05-13 at 10:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fawkes Yep that’s the exact counter argument the censors used. Hey if you don’t like our massive platform that is one of only two or three of the main ones, you can use one of those other two or three that have the exact same censorship rules!!!
It's not like having "fair and unbiased censorship free NO FAKE NEWS" social media is a human right or something. If these platforms are all universally bad, like banks, Then just don't use any of them.
We live in the future and all of this technology is already outdated and should have been replaced with something better long ago. I don't want anyone to regulate anything because I don't want to use any of this shit in the first place. If they have any kind of laws involving the internet it will just get used to fuck people over in the future, just like copyright laws which have made the internet magnitudes more lame ever since ISPs, technology companies and government started enforcing the rules and policing the internet
If any governments tried to take over any of these big tech FANG companies they could just launch all their servers into space and ignore them all until it became a "national security crisis" and they had to blow it up with a nuke.
and by that point we will already be using something better that can't be nuked from space -
2024-05-13 at 10:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The problem with unregulated social media sites is that they are unregulated.
So property rights don't exist because the internet isn't "real" even though if someone puts illegal content on a server they can be "in possession" of it (even if the server isn't physically anywhere near them)
Lanny banning someone because he doesn't like them shouldn't be illegal. It's his server, his property. He can do whatever he wants with it.
If you believe anything different for Zuckerberg or Elon musk, you are a communist and don't believe in property rights, simple as. -
2024-05-13 at 10:57 PM UTCand guess what folks?
Google skewing their search results to hide pro Donald Trump content and promote democrat content and skew elections and public opinion is 100% within their rights. It's their data, their servers, their technology.
If you don't like it, just don't use it.
If you think regulating GOOGLE will solve anything, you are part of the problem -
2024-05-13 at 11:05 PM UTC
-
2024-05-13 at 11:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Infinityshockrates and guess what folks?
Google skewing their search results to hide pro Donald Trump content and promote democrat content and skew elections and public opinion is 100% within their rights. It's their data, their servers, their technology.
If you don't like it, just don't use it.
If you think regulating GOOGLE will solve anything, you are part of the problem
The cheeto chomo's trial is just for promotion. To get his voters excited after he didn't 'lock her up' and left his most fanatical in jail after he got them to riot. I suspect this was just so they couldn't cause any trouble for Biden. So he could eat his ice cream in his Ray-bans and shit his pants in peace.
Elections in the US is about manipulating the perception/image of the permanent state. Not policy. -
2024-05-13 at 11:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cowboy2013 The cheeto chomo's trial is just for promotion. To get his voters excited after he didn't 'lock her up' and left his most fanatical in jail after he got them to riot. I suspect this was just so they couldn't cause any trouble for Biden. So he could eat his ice cream in his Ray-bans and shit his pants in peace.
Elections in the US is about manipulating the perception/image of the permanent state. Not policy.
Trust the plan.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2024-05-13 at 11:33 PM UTCOn queue:
So more 'mah free market' protectionism for Elon and his overpriced electric shitboxes. Elon Mr libertarian who's the biggest corporate welfare recipient of all time. Elonists be like 🙈🙉The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
