User Controls
World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast
-
2023-10-05 at 1:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox You probably don’t have a lot of experience reading charts. What you think is a small amount of time is on the order of thousands or tens of thousands of years. It just looks like a sharp line because they have to fit all that data on a small chart. If you mapped it out in intervals of one thousand years instead of hundreds of thousands of years, it would look almost like a straight line
Apparently I have more experience than you...the graph data-points are presented on the SAME SCALE...as such each peak and valley is relative to the others...
wow. -
2023-10-05 at 1:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Apparently I have more experience than you…the graph data-points are presented on the SAME SCALE…as such each peak and valley is relative to the others…
wow.
I didn’t say it’s a logarithmic scale I said what looks like a rapid change on this chart is actually a gradual change that takes places over tens of thousands of years. Not 100 years -
2023-10-05 at 1:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox You’ve just highlighted periods of roughly 15-20,000 years
Yup..and?
Again you'll note the present change is the SAME...as the others...
Taking a tiny snippet out of that period and saying "oh look the temp has gone up 1 degree in 100yrs)" would/could apply to EACH of the upward trends on that graph.
You need MORE data to get the big picture...not a tiny snippet as often presented by human climate change advocates.
The BIG picture shows nothing unusual going on historically. -
2023-10-05 at 1:53 PM UTC"Oh look the temerature just changed by 1 degree in 100 yrs...
140,000 years ago...
-
2023-10-05 at 1:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian Yup..and?
Again you'll note the present change is the SAME…as the others…
Taking a tiny snippet out of that period and saying "oh look the temp has gone up 1 degree in 100yrs)" would/could apply to EACH of the upward trends on that graph.
You need MORE data to get the big picture…not a tiny snippet as often presented by human climate change advocates.
The BIG picture shows nothing unusual going on historically.
So all this shows is that you have trouble interpreting data, not that the data shows that you’re right. I don’t know how else to explain it to you if you can’t understand.
The current warming trend is far more rapid than historical trends, and those trends can be accounted for by explanations other than human activity. The rate of the current one has no other explanation.
This is all represented by the data, which again you are apparently not qualified to interpret which is why you arrive at a false conclusion. Good day sir -
2023-10-05 at 1:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kawkasian "Oh look the temerature just changed by 1 degree in 100 yrs…
140,000 years ago…
Each horizontal dash on that graph is roughly 5,000 years so it took about 5,000 years for 1 degree of warming to take place vs 100 years in the current warming trend. You continue to prove me right -
2023-10-05 at 1:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox So all this shows is that you have trouble interpreting data, not that the data shows that you’re right. I don’t know how else to explain it to you if you can’t understand.
The current warming trend is far more rapid than historical trends, and those trends can be accounted for by explanations other than human activity. The rate of the current one has no other explanation.
This is all represented by the data, which again you are apparently not qualified to interpret which is why you arrive at a false conclusion. Good day sir
It's you that's not understanding..
You are not looking at the overall data...which clearly shows a COMMON TREND over the last 500,000 years. The present rise in temperature from the last cool period is perfectly in line with the other "heart beats" on the graph. You focusing on a tiny snippet of data rather than observing the overall trend shows a blinkered opinion.
If you can look at that graph and NOT see the obvious trend then there's no help for you. -
2023-10-05 at 2 PM UTC
-
2023-10-05 at 2:10 PM UTCHuman climate change logic:
"Global temperatures are rapidly increasing and humans just recently started burning fossil fuels, therefore humans are responsible for climate change"
"96% of serial killers drink coffee...therefore coffee is the main cause of serial killing" -
2023-10-05 at 2:12 PM UTC
What do you think causes those historical trends? The earth just decided to get hotter? The cycle you’re referring to is driven by tectonic shifts, increased volcanic activity, geological processes that can’t possibly cause as rapid an increase in temperature of what we’re seeing today. There is nothing of the sort occurring today, so to what do you attribute the warming to? What does Jiggaboo Johnson, PhD, want to publish on the scientific journal Niggas In Dot Space?
-
2023-10-05 at 2:14 PM UTC
-
2023-10-05 at 2:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox
What do you think causes those historical trends? The earth just decided to get hotter? The cycle you’re referring to is driven by tectonic shifts, increased volcanic activity, geological processes that can’t possibly cause as rapid an increase in temperature of what we’re seeing today.There is nothing of the sort occurring today,
Still focused on the tiny snippet of data -
2023-10-05 at 2:19 PM UTCReally..there's been no tectonic shifts, no volcanic activity, no geological processes in the last 100yrs...no increased solar activity...
https://www.space.com/2942-sun-activity-increased-century-study-confirms.html
Get the fuck oudda here! -
2023-10-05 at 2:35 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2023-10-05 at 3:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Science is not about how many people agree with you.
That’s literally ALL science is, lol. Ever heard of the scientific method, champ? Anyone can make a claim, the only way to prove if it’s correct or not with a high degree of accuracy is to have other people replicate your results in other words how many people agree with you. There is no science without consensus. I swear my intellect is wasted on you fools… if this is the only type of shit you can come up withThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-10-05 at 3:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox Fair, here’s some not false information to help make up for that:
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-global-average-temperature-from-the-instrumented-record-The-yearly-average-shows_fig13_322641763
https://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2020/2019-years/
Those "sources" are completely worthless, as they are funded by the United Nations - known liars and criminals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Academic_Impact -
2023-10-05 at 3:54 PM UTCGo back to bed grandpa
-
2023-10-05 at 3:55 PM UTC^ A kid who still doesn't know what an independent source is.
-
2023-10-05 at 3:59 PM UTC^ A geriatric roofer with a failed band
-
2023-10-05 at 4 PM UTC
