User Controls
Are pedos monsters or just sick?
-
2017-05-30 at 1:28 AM UTC
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Right you dont choose. Their brains are just wired that way. I guess what I want to know from you mmQ is whether or not you would change that about someone if it were possible. If it were like healing an injury or correcting a cleft palate. Would you correct an abnormality in someone's brain of it were the cause of their desire to fuck children? Would you correct an abnormality in someone's brain if it were the cause of their desire to murder people?
Yes.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-30 at 1:30 AM UTCThanks mmQ.
-
2017-05-30 at 1:30 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 1:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Ans I believe Sophie and others might too. I think I've posted that question to him though I can't remember his answer. Essentially, Sophie, if you could change you wiring to not be attracted to youths, would you?
He already answered that question here:
https://niggasin.space/thread/12343?p=3#post-178551 -
2017-05-30 at 1:38 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 1:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by Darth Beaver If someone is wired to piss on your shoes every time they see you and it can't be fixed like cleft palate would you say well that's just how they're wired or would you cut their pisser off?
I guess I'd take an x-ray first off and run some diagnostics. I don't wanna have to cut their dick off just because they like to pee on things. I'd search for an alternative remedy. -
2017-05-30 at 1:40 AM UTCPedophiles are mentally ill. But like any mental illness, whether or not you are a "monster" is not a question of evil but of pathology and agency. Child molestors are "monsters" but not because they're cackling villains but because they are sick to another level.
-
2017-05-30 at 1:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Pedophiles are mentally ill. But like any mental illness, whether or not you are a "monster" is not a question of evil but of pathology and agency. Child molestors are "monsters" but not because they're cackling villains but because they are sick to another level.
Thanks Siri. -
2017-05-30 at 1:51 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 1:54 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-30 at 2:13 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 2:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ I guess I'd take an x-ray first off and run some diagnostics. I don't wanna have to cut their dick off just because they like to pee on things. I'd search for an alternative remedy.
Like I said, if it was known beyond a shadow of a doubt there was no cure would you just live with pissy shoes? -
2017-05-30 at 3:10 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 3:33 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 3:38 AM UTC
Originally posted by Darth Beaver OK, so the point is someone's wiring doesn't mean the rest of us have to put up their shit with until or if there ever is a way to rewire fucked up units.
I've already posited the alternative. If their wiring WANTS to make them piss on your shoes but they never do it... Is that ok? -
2017-05-30 at 3:53 AM UTC
-
2017-05-30 at 4:22 AM UTCI view pedophilia like any other kink, with the exception that, as soon as it's acted upon in a way that brings harm to a real child, e.g. the pedophile seeks out and consumes child porn (which is inherently wrong even if the child wasn't harmed in its production, as it brings an innocent into an illicit and inherently corrupting world at an age where they can't rightfully and mindfully consent) or actually diddles a child, it's wrong.
If a pedo wants to read loli stuff, I'm not going to complain or call them a pedo, but when a pedo wants to rape a kid or consumes real-life child porn, their fetish has become more than a harmless attraction. -
2017-05-30 at 9:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Rosemary I view pedophilia like any other kink, with the exception that, as soon as it's acted upon in a way that brings harm to a real child, e.g. the pedophile seeks out and consumes child porn (which is inherently wrong even if the child wasn't harmed in its production, as it brings an innocent into an illicit and inherently corrupting world at an age where they can't rightfully and mindfully consent) or actually diddles a child, it's wrong.
If a pedo wants to read loli stuff, I'm not going to complain or call them a pedo, but when a pedo wants to rape a kid or consumes real-life child porn, their fetish has become more than a harmless attraction.
Explain to me how CP that is produced by the child(I use the term loosely here), in which no one was harmed is "inherently wrong" and before you say that does not happen i have a billion onions that say you are wrong. Say the word and i'll PM you a butt-load. -
2017-05-30 at 9:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Explain to me how CP that is produced by the child(I use the term loosely here), in which no one was harmed is "inherently wrong" and before you say that does not happen i have a billion onions that say you are wrong. Say the word and i'll PM you a butt-load.
It's not wrong for the child to make (children are innocent and largely don't know better). I think the objection stems from what is meant by you consuming it - namely that you have an attraction to children, which is deviant and socially unacceptable.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-30 at 9:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by Dargo It's not wrong for the child to make (children are innocent and largely don't know better). I think the objection stems from what is meant by you consuming it - namely that you have an attraction to children, which is deviant and socially unacceptable.
Yes and being a jedi in 1939 Berlin was socially unacceptable as well.
