didnt girls in victorian england look older?

1. 2023-09-04 at 5:50 PM UTC

   #1
   Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
   https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/history/newcastle-children-sentenced-jail-hard-11290012
2. 2023-09-04 at 5:51 PM UTC

   #2
   

   totse2118 Space Nigga [my ci light-haired pongee]
   rthat literally says children
   
   

   Originally posted by Wariat https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/history/newcastle-children-sentenced-jail-hard-11290012

3. 2023-09-04 at 5:51 PM UTC

   #3
   Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
   i mean compare them to today. plus i believe tht was around the time the aoc of consent was changed form 12 to 13 but barely like by a couple years or so where it was 12.
4. 2023-09-04 at 6:14 PM UTC

   #4
   

   totse2118 Space Nigga [my ci light-haired pongee]

   Originally posted by Wariat i mean compare them to today. plus i believe tht was around the time the aoc of consent was changed form 12 to 13 but barely like by a couple years or so where it was 12.

   
   there is no difference between a teenager from 200 years ago and today, literally zero difference at all.
5. 2023-09-04 at 6:15 PM UTC

   #5
   Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist

   Originally posted by totse2118 there is no difference between a teenager from 200 years ago and today, literally zero difference at all.

   
   there is. lots of difference. they worked back then and prostitution was seen as a noble creer path for girls form the slums back then. plus they just looked older because the concept of a child didnt really exist.
6. 2023-09-04 at 6:15 PM UTC

   #6
   Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
   so they had to mature faster and had a stern look to them. even compare people form the 1970s to today.