User Controls
"Deadliest Varient Covid Yet" to hit UK by October
-
2023-08-27 at 4:03 PM UTCSay you design a vaccine that's 70% effective. Intentionally not 100%. 30% of the vaccinated still die, but it improves your odds of surviving. You can exercise relatively fine control over the population level that way - it doesn't have to be 30%. It can be 80%. 90%. My theory is essentially your theory, except inverted in such a way that the bad guys don't make the same big stupid mistake like they do in all the stories: the good guys just lose. The good guys are dead before the fighting even starts.
Both strategies use the vaccine as a selection mechanism, except in your version of the story the NWO for some reason decides to adopt a strategy that preserves the good guys. If this were a Hollywood movie, that'd 100% be their plan, because nobody wants to watch a movie where the good guys die of coof in the first 15 minutes and the remaining 80 minutes of runtime are just George Soros and Jeff Bezos drinking pina coladas while their robot butlers whip disobedient peasants. Real life isn't a movie. If the NWO is going to depopulate, they aren't going to do it in such a way that there's a compelling narrative for rebels to play the hero in. They're just going to sneakily kill you off before you have a chance to fight back.🤷🏻♀️
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The Plan is simple: kill everybody. Both the slaves and the rebels. What don't you understand about that?
THEY AREN'T ANPRIMS. Who's going to clean their toilets? Who's going to design the machine that cleans their toilets? They want peasants. -
2023-08-27 at 4:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai The part about "none of the elites getting vaxxed". I mean whatever, believe what you want, but again: the plot as I've spelled it out ITT makes a fuckload more sense than the one that intentionally leaves you alive to resist the NWO. Nobody ever seems to have an answer for why the NWO would go with the plan that *doesn't work on their enemies*.
I believe in facts, and i woulda thought you did to.
So let me give you one here.
Pfizer employees getting a "special batch". I must warn you though, its extremely painful to watch. Turn up the speed for your own sake.
Prior to this date i was also in possession of a few links to reports of nurses being asked to use saline on high profile individuals who was to be injected in front of a live audience. These files seems to have been removed from youtube by the ministry of truth. It hardly matters though as you probably wouldn't believe anecdotal reports anyway. Take it from the horses mouth. If pfizer seems to think their employees deserves a "special batch", why wouldn't the elites deserve the same?
That being said though, i don't think any one of the elites got a jab with the exception of those who was doing it in public for good showmanship, and that was most likely saline. I don't think you get it. These people don't care about us. At this moment in time, they just want to depopulate and introduce a new world order along with all the draconian measures required for such a thing.
The west as we know it is a thing of the past. Democracy is no more and haven't been for a while. The new show is fascism.
Look to china, the west will be remarkably similar in 10 years.
Unless we resist.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-08-27 at 4:11 PM UTC
-
2023-08-27 at 4:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Say you design a vaccine that's 70% effective. Intentionally not 100%. 30% of the vaccinated still die, but it improves your odds of surviving. You can exercise relatively fine control over the population level that way - it doesn't have to be 30%. It can be 80%. 90%. My theory is essentially your theory, except the inverted in such a way that the bad guys don't make the same big stupid mistake like they do in all the stories: the good guys just lose. The good guys are dead before the fighting even starts.
Both strategies use the vaccine as a selection mechanism, except in your version of the story the NWO for some reason decides to adopt a strategy that preserves the good guys. If this were a Hollywood movie, that'd 100% be their plan, because nobody wants to watch a movie where the good guys die of coof in the first 15 minutes and the remaining 80 minutes of runtime are just George Soros and Jeff Bezos drinking pina coladas while their robot butlers whip disobedient peasants. Real life isn't a movie. If the NWO is going to depopulate, they aren't going to do it in such a way that there's a compelling narrative for rebels to play the hero in. They're just going to sneakily kill you off before you have a chance to fight back.🤷🏻♀️
THEY AREN'T ANPRIMS. Who's going to clean their toilets? Who's going to design the machine that cleans their toilets? They want peasants.
The rebels are "taken care of" in the next segment of the master plan. ie: cashless society, 15-minute concentration camps, re-education centers, etc., etc.. It's not like they don't plan to go after the people who've been paying attention. They have this meticulously planned out and strategized. Kill all the dummies off first, then bring out the big guns for the rest. Like, if you're starving and you come across an apple tree full of apples, you don't insist on getting those apples way up on the top branches first. You just grab as many apples from the easily accessible branches first. Same thing with this plan. Eliminate the bulk of mankind right off the bat, which is the dummies, then attack the rest after that. Dealing with a minority makes it all that much more manageable, as far as numbers, and humanity does outnumber them a million to one right now. The way it is right now, one more mistake and they could be finished. -
2023-08-27 at 4:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The rebels are "taken care of" in the next segment of the master plan. ie: cashless society, 15-minute concentration camps, re-education centers, etc., etc.. It's not like they don't plan to go after the people who've been paying attention. They have this meticulously planned out and strategized. Kill all the dummies off first, then bring out the big guns for the rest. Like, if you're starving and you come across an apple tree full of apples, you don't insist on getting those apples way up on the top branches first. You just grab as many apples from the easily accessible branches first. Same thing with this plan. Eliminate the bulk of mankind right off the bat, which is the dummies, then attack the rest after that. Dealing with a minority makes it all that much more manageable, as far as numbers, and humanity does outnumber them a million to one right now. The way it is right now, one more mistake and they could be finished.
WHY WAIT. Why preserve the rebels when you can just quietly off them as described? Why "bring out the big guns" to deal with you, if you'll kindly let them kill you with a bioweapon?
"They're going to kill everyone and have nobody to rule over and society will completely crumble until Jeff Bezos wanders the streets of a dilapidated post-apocalyptic Miami wearing nothing but a loincloth and eating a diet of fresh fruit picked by supermodels. George Soros will fish up his own caviar on a raft he made from logs all by himself."
No. Don't be retarded. Depopulation is not a voluntary extinction program, because cui bono? It's a program of control. There's no point if there's nobody left to rule over. -
2023-08-27 at 4:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai "They're going to kill everyone and have nobody to rule over and society will completely crumble until Jeff Bezos wanders the streets of a dilapidated post-apocalyptic Miami wearing nothing but a loincloth and eating a diet of fresh fruit picked by supermodels. George Soros will fish up his own caviar on a raft he made from logs all by himself."
No. Don't be retarded. Depopulation is not a voluntary extinction program, because cui bono? It's a program of control. There's no point if there's nobody left to rule over.
No, they leave 500 million of the dummies, as personal slaves. Those they give placebos to. -
2023-08-27 at 4:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ No, they leave 500 million of the dummies, as personal slaves. Those they give placebos to.
Yeah, so why would stage one of the plan be "kill a bunch of people in such a way that there are a ton of rebels we have to use tanks to take out"? They can kill you with the coof, and then cull the credulous slaves with famine. The famines will create more rebels, the big guns will come out either way, but why inflate the rebel numbers by implementing a plan that leaves a bunch of people alive who are already in semi-open rebellion?
It makes no fucking sense. -
2023-08-27 at 4:31 PM UTCLike, lets say 10 million "elites":490 million slaves. If your plan is implemented, a greater proportion of those slaves are likely to be wily rebels because there was a greater number of rebels to begin with. Killing you by essentially allowing you to walk into a biological war zone with no protection of your own [manipulated] volition is way more effective at reducing the number of rebels. You are low hanging rebel fruit, and if the goal is getting rid of the rebellious instinct and domesticating humanity under elite rulership, they will pick you off the vine first because that is optimal play.
-
2023-08-27 at 4:31 PM UTCCUMVID69
-
2023-08-27 at 4:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Yeah, so why would stage one of the plan be "kill a bunch of people in such a way that there are a ton of rebels we have to use tanks to take out"? They can kill you with the coof, and then cull the credulous slaves with famine. The famines will create more rebels, the big guns will come out either way, but why inflate the rebel numbers by implementing a plan that leaves a bunch of people alive who are already in semi-open rebellion?
It makes no fucking sense.
Thats where the immigrants come in. In the name of inclusivity the borders will stay open.
In europe's case, we're getting a shitload of sharia drivin muslims who's religion's sole purpose is to rule the world, as it is the only true religion.
In the case of states, you're getting shitload of mexican cartel members with itchy fingers and bad drug habits.
Crime will explode. Civil war will be fought. All those rebel's you're talking about will fight, die, submit, or leave.
Once all that is over, china will come and clean up.
This is already happening. You don't have to look far to see a rise in crime all over. -
2023-08-27 at 4:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Yeah, so why would stage one of the plan be "kill a bunch of people in such a way that there are a ton of rebels we have to use tanks to take out"? They can kill you with the coof, and then cull the credulous slaves with famine. The famines will create more rebels, the big guns will come out either way, but why inflate the rebel numbers by implementing a plan that leaves a bunch of people alive who are already in semi-open rebellion?
It makes no fucking sense.
I've already fully explained that, killing off the majority of the population right away, the dummies, makes things a lot more manageable for them. Instead of managing 7.8 billion people, they're only managing a few hundred million. -
2023-08-27 at 4:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I've already fully explained that, killing off the majority of the population right away, the dummies, makes things a lot more manageable for them. Instead of managing 7.8 billion people, you're only managing a few hundred million.
It really doesn't explain that though: they'd be killing off everyone in comparable timeframes, it's just that my way of doing things actually selects against rebels instead of selecting for their preservation for totally inexplicable reasons (well, they're totally explicable in the sense that it just flatters your ego, but it's inexplicable for them to care about that). -
2023-08-27 at 4:41 PM UTCUsing vaccines as a vector for attack is dumb because vaccines = loyalty. Using ineffective vaccines or saline not-actually-vaccinations against (in the case of saline, most of) the public and releasing a bioweapon gives you way more control over the final makeup of the slave population than injecting everyone except rebels with deadly poison.
Also: having to fight a million simultaneous insurgencies across the globe is not "manageable". With the stage 3 famine method of depopulation, you can better control where the insurgencies spring up. -
2023-08-27 at 4:43 PM UTCYou could divide the world into sectors (no travel because travel spreads disease), and depopulate the coof survivors with famine going sector by sector, crushing insurgent forces as they spring up in each region. 🤔
(Whereas leaving a bunch of antivaxx rebels alive in every region is liable to lead to a SHIT TON of simultaneous fires they need to put out. It's easier to cull sheep than wolves.) -
2023-08-27 at 5:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai It really doesn't explain that though: they'd be killing off everyone in comparable timeframes, it's just that my way of doing things actually selects against rebels instead of selecting for their preservation for totally inexplicable reasons (well, they're totally explicable in the sense that it just flatters your ego, but it's inexplicable for them to care about that).
Practically eryone would become a rebel. Stick to things you know. Like highlighters... -
2023-08-27 at 6:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Using vaccines as a vector for attack is dumb because vaccines = loyalty. Using ineffective vaccines or saline not-actually-vaccinations against (in the case of saline, most of) the public and releasing a bioweapon gives you way more control over the final makeup of the slave population than injecting everyone except rebels with deadly poison.
Also: having to fight a million simultaneous insurgencies across the globe is not "manageable". With the stage 3 famine method of depopulation, you can better control where the insurgencies spring up.
The jabs not only serve depopulation, they serve as a clear metric of the control factor. This is the Silent War: The War For Your Mind. -
2023-08-27 at 7:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The jabs not only serve depopulation, they serve as a clear metric of the control factor. This is the Silent War: The War For Your Mind.
It'd be completely useless metric if everyone who gets the jab is supposed to die, you fucking ninny.
Originally posted by Meikai
Think, Tards! THINK! -
2023-08-27 at 7:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai It'd be completely useless metric if everyone who gets the jab is supposed to die, you fucking ninny.
No, when they compare the numbers who are stupid enough to take it against the entire population, it gives them an idea of how effective their brainwashing and clever schemes are working. -
2023-08-27 at 7:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ No, when they compare the numbers who are stupid enough to take it against the entire population, it gives them an idea of how effective their brainwashing and clever schemes are working.
Let's call it 80/20 because that's the rule. Of the remaining 20%, how effective are their brainwashing and clever schemes? Who fucking knows?
And are 80% of that 20% equally susceptible? Are 80% of the 20% remaining from that initial 20% also equally susceptible? Follow that trend to its logical conclusion and everyone is susceptible! No useful data to be gleaned. Moron. -
2023-08-27 at 11:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai Let's call it 80/20 because that's the rule. Of the remaining 20%, how effective are their brainwashing and clever schemes? Who fucking knows?
And are 80% of that 20% equally susceptible? Are 80% of the 20% remaining from that initial 20% also equally susceptible? Follow that trend to its logical conclusion and everyone is susceptible! No useful data to be gleaned. Moron.
If you have ten rats in a box and eight chew their own legs off, you know those eight rats are crazy. You realize the vast majority of the rats in the box are crazy.
