what is zk-snarks??? Idk man I don't fucking understand half this shit to be honest, I am starting to think I might be actual skitzo and maybe banks are right just encrypt everything with 8bits and store it on a central server I mean IF IT AINT BROKE DON"T FIX IT has a bank ever been hacked????? also you can't "hack a bank" as the money touches acccounts and system they control totally so they can just presss a button and lock you out of the account/s forever and catch your crime easily
and it will never change , upgrade or improve becuase it works perfectly and anyone that disagrees is a communist or skitzo
I think they solved the problem that OSIRIS web portal frames had though where instead of loading a site the site just exists and you only load packets as they are all sent through the network jumpbled like tor but in reverse also kinda like BBS's with store foward, but in reverse.
a number of privacy-centric tokens and techniques have appeared and are getting more popular each day. Today, the most popular privacy coins are Monero, Zcash, Dash, and PIVX.
Today we are going to dig into the technology that protects Zcash, as well as the hard fork of Zcash known as Zclassic, and it’s impending change into Bitcoin Private. Introducing zk-SNARKs
Contents [Show]
zk-SNARKs works on what is known as zero-knowledge proofs. Zero knowledge proofs have been directly promoted by famed former CIA contractor Edward Snowden in a Twitter post late last year. The idea of zero-knowledge proofs comes from several MIT researchers back in the 1980s.
In simple terms, zero-knowledge proofs means that between two parties of a transaction, each party is able to verify to the other that they have a specific set of information, without revealing what that information is. This is significantly different than other systems of proof where at least one party needs to know all the information. An example of this would be a password stored on a server in plain text.
In this case, if you were logging into the server, you need to have the password and the server needs to check if the password you entered is correct. With zero knowledge proofs, the person logging into the server could essentially demonstrate through mathematical proof that they have the correct password without revealing what that password is. Of course today most websites do not store user passwords in plain text and instead, store what is called a hash. Still, hashes can be stolen and under some circumstances can be computed out.
the starkware starkwave industries is valued at billions of dollaars btw , this will probably be how fedcoin functions in like 200 years
You run your server setup configured for your needs, but it is hosted by the p2p network, and presented as a normal web page. DDoSing is dealt with because it would be like pushing a bubble around under wall-paper. Your site is just served from somewhere else, or even multiple somewhere elses.
I haven't had a chance to play with this, but I thought I should bring it to your attention. Potentially we can end bandwidth, storage, and geographic limitations.
I knew this was technically possible, but now I can stop trying to convince you lot, and just show a working site. The home page hosts several forums using it, and is itself running on the backbone of p2p.
Re: Osiris (Serverless Portal System)
Post by Feralidragon » Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:49 pm It's a highly insecure system. There's a reason why sites aren't hosted in P2P, and that's the extremely high insecurity of whole concept behind it. To put things in perspective: hosting a site in P2P is actually more insecure than having a regular centralized site open to SQL injection, XSS and all sorts of attack vectors. The only thing P2P is better at is that is impossible to do a DDoS to the service, other than that is a failed concept when it comes to a website.
the starkware starkwave industries is valued at billions of dollaars btw , this will probably be how fedcoin functions in like 200 years
