User Controls

What if you took every privacyNET, Darknet, i2p and layered them to create a supernet

  1. #1
    Infinityshockrates Tuskegee Airman
    Would this combined with being able to "be your own ISP" make it so it's finally impossible to "control" the internet? Because okay if you connect normally , you are watched (like in that one book where they have the population limit on kids but the illegal kids all becomes hackers)

    but there's so many of these networks, I just keep finding them and they are all independent to get away from the internet and stay in their little echo chamber, but I thought the point of the internet was so you could connect with people outside your local community, or something. All the privacy nets should join up and start their own UN approved privacy network that tells everyone to get fucked, it will probably be easier to ban if that happened though

    but like it's not even changing how they work, the tech is still secure it's just used as an alternative when it should be a replacement
    like all mail and software should be PGP encyrpted just as like another layer, I know you can use things with certain email clients that do it all automatically. Privacy features like that should be the default in my opinion
    apparently this company is in Ontario? tf i'm gonna work for them fuck this shit. also cryptocurrency Garlic Mix all this and throw another layer on top of that and have it all work together
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freenet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Onion_routing
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InterPlanetary_File_System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mix_networks
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_P2P https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZeroNet
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darknet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_web
    I don't know what "PirateBrowser" is but im gonna fork it and make THE ULTIMATE BOWSER https://sizeof.cat/post/lainring/
    check out the lainring folx
  2. #2
    cryptographiccontrarian African Astronaut
    its all fake anyways
  3. #3
    Infinityshockrates Tuskegee Airman
    No actually those are real cool people from lainchain. You are a fake lil "og TOTSEAN" yeah sure who the fuck cares, everyone from that cringe community should neck

    Lainchain has their own fucking privacy 🔏 webring. I'm sure they have a few nonces in the mix too but every site I've visited has had god tier downloadable files, warez , archives to Terry Davis (how I found this) and they seem to have been around for a while and got into BBSing years ago , they literally have MULTIPLE BBSs right now you can dial into

    This community aint shit but hoes and tricks like you. That's why the real ones left and we will make software that auto pushes and pulls people in various directions called THE WEIGHT PUSHER BOT and it's weighted on randomized abstract goals defined by the random number generator aka VOICE OF GOD in templeOS as that is built to interpret the bible perfectly
    The people who deny God cannot understand this

    Tables of random numbers have probably been used for multiple purposes at least since the Industrial Revolution. The first published table appears to be by the English statistician L.H.C. Tippett. In the digital age, algorithmic random number generators have largely replaced these tables. The NIST Randomness Beacon expands the use of randomness to multiple scenarios in which the latter methods cannot be used. The extra functionalities stem mainly from three features. First, the Beacon-generated numbers cannot be predicted before they are published. Second, the public, time-bound, and authenticated nature of the Beacon allows a user application to prove to anybody that it used truly random numbers not known before a certain point in time. Third, this proof can be presented offline and at any point in the future. For example, the proof could be mailed to a trusted third party, encrypted and signed by an application, only to be opened if needed and authorized.

    Retard-nigger nonscientists.
    https://sizeof.cat/project/terry-davis-quotes/
  4. #4
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    you can pipe anonymity networks through each other but then each layer both increases latency and potential points of failure; it's generally not worth the trouble
  5. #5
    cryptographiccontrarian African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Infinityshockrates who the fuck cares

    literally everyone lol
  6. #6
    Infinityshockrates Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by aldra you can pipe anonymity networks through each other but then each layer both increases latency and potential points of failure; it's generally not worth the trouble

    Well if you don't need all of them and can only be connected by one idk and latency schmatency I'm sure that can be solved , and having a webpage that auto plays a 4k video every time I'd rather have the laggyiest connection in the world and telenet through space or something

    But for games and like important stuff and most stuff that's important. Yeah sometimes I use these networks and they are like a dog's ass but lots of people are getting into it, I think it was hardcore network nerds experimenting, and privacy goys/hackers . Now it seems like it's just another cowboy 🤠 technology. St hiki was right!
  7. #7
    Infinityshockrates Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by cryptographiccontrarian literally everyone lol

    Well I want to make a BBS too and those can be set up to run on all kinds of shit. Im learning network and shit the good old fashioned way. They should teach this in school god damnit I learned fucking html CSS and how to build a computer. Everything else I learned myself
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIRVANAnet
    I'm getting visions from Jeff hunter himselfn! Build the Third Temple of Totse and connect it to the FIDONET protocol. We must connect the darknet and lainchain to the FIDONET and share files! This is the way of our ancestors *Huff's spraypaint*
  8. #8
    The internet is a series of onions
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. #9
    Pete Green African Astronaut
    glass onion.

    its a riddle that the beatles were sending us.
  10. #10
    Ghast Houston
    Originally posted by I Live In Your Crawlspace Secretly4 The internet is a series of onions

    deeeeeep

    Originally posted by Pete Green glass onion.

    its a riddle that the beatles were sending us.

    shallow

    Hey fuys GARLIC ROUTING ... sounds delicious yes???
  11. #11
  12. #12
  13. #13
    Ghast Houston
    Originally posted by Blunt Wrap Supreme Think yall are looking for GNUnet or something, the whole stack redone to address errything or somthing

    I'm just wondering if it's possible and if not, why. The latency thing makes sense, but when everything is built from top to bottom and OH WELL your PC can't load this webpage? Sounds like a YOU problem. When they used to have a totally different philosophy, that seems to have been abanadoned with the assumption that 99% of society is buying the newest iphone every year.. Which is actually only a fraction % of the market and for some reason people think that's cool and call you a faggot if you don't UPGRADE

    These privacy networks aren't quite there yet, but "there" is becoming an ever further goalpost that I don't even want to arrive at with top of the line hardware "oh wow it's fucking nothing!" I see people dropping hundreds, thousands of dollars on things and they get bored of them I NEED ANOTHER LOOTBOX MAN WHENS THE NEXT UPDATE. Meanwhile i'm trying to figure out how to set up a virtual fax machine AND HAVING FUN while this person that was all excited about their new PC is sad because nobody else can run the TOP SHELF GAMES , like...uh yeah? maybe play something not cucked. I just don't understand the mentality at all. Like people who cry when a game isn't 4k 200fps like bruh im thanksful to get 20fps on minecraft these days because of how fucked the client is from bloat
  14. #14
  15. #15
    Ghast Houston
    Designers were encouraged to stick to these 216 "web-safe" colors in their websites because there were a lot of 8-bit color displays when the 216-color palette was developed. David Lehn and Hadley Stern discovered that only 22 of the 216 colors in the web-safe palette are reliably displayed without inconsistent remapping on 16-bit computer displays. They called these 22 colors "the really safe palette"; it consists largely of shades of green, yellow, and cyan

    THis was for WEB DESIGN mind you, now fucking people can't even stick to "runs on anything besides your cooked linux supercomputer /iphone" every new software that isn't open source it seems follows this jedi design philosophy where it needs to hook into 600 different things and can't just excecute run assembly machine code, the fuck are you talking about? Or sure it runs bytecode..on the VIRTUAL MACHINE and those aren't even the problem ,those are cool when used for the stuff that's cool and seems to be a problem with these new fangled high level cuck languages and people become isolated by these high barrier walls that demand you spend thousands of dollars before you can be considered even at the most base level of doing anything it seems.

    also don't forget to get a license YOU WANT TO MAKE PDFs??? BRUH the digital media
Jump to Top