Is it possible to be a Stalinist-Anarchist

1. 2023-07-10 at 6:34 PM UTC

   #1
   

   That forum guy that helps you understand sarcasm Tuskegee Airman
   Isn't that basically just Trotskyism where you hold a gun to Stalins head and say "SERVE THE PEOPLE BETTER!! OR ELSE!"
   
   or if you shoot Stalin in the head. Can you still be a Stalinist? Or a Maoist or Leninist? or does it "technically" just end that being considered a political movement right there. People still identify as marxist or even lenin/maoist today though.
   
   Seems like a misstep in ideology to me but I am not very well versed on actual real communism IT'S A LOT OF READING OKAY. It's like eastern philosophy/religion, I have to really pay attention or it just goes over my head
   
   isn't juche just the same idea but upgraded so if the dude dies you don't have to worry about this?
   

   In contemporary political discourse on North Korea, Juche has a connotation of "self-reliance", "autonomy", and "independence". It is often defined in opposition to the Korean concept of Sadae, or reliance on the great powers

2. 2023-07-10 at 6:47 PM UTC

   #2
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
   Anarchists always support American/Western/CIA proxies in their regime change efforts. They want violent revolution for those governments, but for we will fight The Great Satan by feeding the homeless peanut butter sandwiches. So they're similar to Trotskyists and Maoists in this way. Generally Marxist Leninists are Stalinists I guess you would say.
   
   There's not much wrong with Mao but rather Maoists like them being against China. Idk what CPUSA considers itself but it's its just imperialist controlled opposition. The US has a legitimate communist party that's aligned with the communist party of Russia and stuff like that. PCUSA.
3. 2023-07-10 at 6:50 PM UTC

   #3
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
   Like Anarchists support the PKA or whatever it's called. The Kurdish terrorists that the US is behind in Syria.
4. 2023-07-10 at 7:03 PM UTC

   #4
   

   That forum guy that helps you understand sarcasm Tuskegee Airman

   Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Like Anarchists support the PKA or whatever it's called. The Kurdish terrorists that the US is behind in Syria.

   
   Yeah, Kurds are pretty funny though I mean I think anarchists probably just default to supporting anyone destabilizing power in any particular area. I've never heard of African anarchism probably because they are too busy supporting the DRK FRC the ZZP ZAMBIAN LORDS ARMY al shabib they got like 1000 fractions, you could almost say it's too decentralized.
   
   When the police decide to start wiping out villages and shit, like in Nigeria, where the government going against the people is not uncommon.
   
   
   

   Originally posted by Cowboy2013 There's not much wrong with Mao but rather Maoists like them being against China. Idk what CPUSA considers itself but it's its just imperialist controlled opposition. The US has a legitimate communist party that's aligned with the communist party of Russia and stuff like that. PCUSA.

   they probably let cointelpro in on purpose. lol they believe you can vote out the workers proletariat like uhh no BROTHER we communist now GET BACK TO WORK THAT SOUNDS COUNTER REVOLUTIONARY TO ME
   
   

   Originally posted by Infinityshockrates There is no real American communism except LANNYISM
   

5. 2023-07-10 at 7:26 PM UTC

   #5
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
   One thing all these people have in common is they want revolutions everywhere except the place that needs one the most. They're imperialists because the whole idea is to install US proxies. Their foreign policy wouldn't be any different than the US state department. CPUSA tells people to vote for Hillary Clinton lol. PCUSA was founded by people kicked out of CPUSA.
   
   http://partyofcommunistsusa.net
   
   Idk the history of CPUSA but yeah at some point it was compromised. I don't think it was like that to begin with.
6. 2023-07-10 at 7:29 PM UTC

   #6
   Cowboy2013 African Astronaut
   Something else to be aware of is the weaponized term "nazbol". Ig that's an alt-right but people like this will use it to label any communist with more socially conservative views which was really always the case before and still is with socialist nations today.
7. 2023-07-10 at 7:54 PM UTC

   #7
   

   Meikai Heck This Schlong

   Originally posted by Cowboy2013 Something else to be aware of is the weaponized term "nazbol". Ig that's an alt-right but people like this will use it to label any communist with more socially conservative views which was really always the case before and still is with socialist nations today.

   
   
   
   Nazbol is a thing. It's not just a weaponized term, and it's not about being "socially conservative" - it essentially describes communists of the mind that "communists can do a little imperialism too, as a treat". Ironically, of all the potential flavors of commie, this is the kind the alt-right is most sympathetic toward - it's not a slander that they created.
8. 2023-07-10 at 9:05 PM UTC

   #8
   

   That forum guy that helps you understand sarcasm Tuskegee Airman
   Poltiical theory on both side confuses the fuck out of me and goes way too hard
   
   now I know how pol pot felt