why Kite first? because kite is something controlled from the ground on a string. the Plane was a kite. it was controlled by remote control. the hijackers were just there for the visual effect. something to blame on. they may have been trying to hijack it or they may have thought it was a dry run but they didn't take control. that was done by treasonous in our Government and outside of our Government and paid for by Saudi Arabs and Bolshevik Mossad breakoff from KGB aided Sauds.
"We're Cousins". I never said jedis I am stating Bolshevik.
it's obvious af.
how many Hollywood predictive programming has to happen before people just flat out say "Not coincidence but obviously trying to mock truth up front so people will be laughed at if they bring up the connections as nothing more than coincidence"
"the hijackers were just there for the visual effect"
Hijackers? You mean the ones we know about because we found their passports in the burning rubble of WTC? lmao fuck how do you schizopost this hard? Why even believe there were hijackers "for the visual effect"? What visual effect? YOU NEVER SAW THE HIJACKING. You were told the planes were hijacked, and that Flight 97 bravely fought off their hijacker before reaching their target, and maybe there are even some blackbox recordings of alleged hijackers speaking in the cockpit, but there's no "visual effect" the hijackers bring to this story. If you think they were controlled from the ground, then the hijackers (and indeed the presence of passengers on the plane at all) are completely unnecessary to the conspiracy narrative.
Originally posted by Meikai
"the hijackers were just there for the visual effect"
Hijackers? You mean the ones we know about because we found their passports in the burning rubble of WTC? lmao fuck how do you schizopost this hard? Why even believe there were hijackers "for the visual effect"? What visual effect? YOU NEVER SAW THE HIJACKING. You were told the planes were hijacked, and that Flight 97 bravely fought off their hijacker before reaching their target, and maybe there are even some blackbox recordings of alleged hijackers speaking in the cockpit, but there's no "visual effect" the hijackers bring to this story. If you think they were controlled from the ground, then the hijackers (and indeed the presence of passengers on the plane at all) are completely unnecessary to the conspiracy narrative.
Fuck.
Im not sure you're arguing against or for what I am saying, Weirdo.
Your brain is glitched. They saw the hijackers boarding the planes. so they were there. you're right as far as them not ever being hijackers in the first place but just guys chosen. black sheep or just random cunts to easily make a story stick.
but we know that the Saudis paid for this shit too. the rabbit hole runs deep and wide like the tracking your highlighter-pen cap went into
I didn't read any of the thread but I just skimmed the utube title and the lone gunman used to be on fox at 10pm on Sundays and I remember watching it with my dad who really enjoyed the show for some reason, despite not being a big fan of the X files.
Originally posted by Pete Green
Im not sure you're arguing against or for what I am saying, Weirdo.
Your brain is glitched. They saw the hijackers boarding the planes. so they were there. you're right as far as them not ever being hijackers in the first place but just guys chosen. black sheep or just random cunts to easily make a story stick.
but we know that the Saudis paid for this shit too. the rabbit hole runs deep and wide like the tracking your highlighter-pen cap went into
lmao "there's video footage of them walking onto the plane" aka "there's video footage of some guys in a hallway"
Plus, who saw them "getting on the plane(s)"? I sure af didn't. "They"? The government? The one who flew the supposed kites?
