User Controls
World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast
-
2023-07-05 at 2:49 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 2:52 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 2:59 PM UTCanecdotal claim begets anecdotal refutation
-
2023-07-05 at 3:02 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 3:03 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 3:04 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 3:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/421-010-CasesInNotFullyVaccinated.pdf
Stay in school kid.
"not fully vaccinated" ?
we are talkimg about the un-vaccinated. -
2023-07-05 at 3:20 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 3:20 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 5:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It was global cooling for decades.
About That 1970s Global Cooling...Today, climate scientists tell us the Earth is warming. Some people deny that, and point out that in the 1970s, climate scientists said the Earth was cooling, perhaps headed into another ice age. Today's scientists counter that it wasn't climate scientists who said that, it was the media.
… the fundamental observation that dominates today's climate science — that global warming is happening and is driven by manmade carbon dioxide emissions — was as real then as it is today.
Originally posted by Obbe
-
2023-07-05 at 5:23 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 8:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe About That 1970s Global Cooling...
Where did the media get their information? -
2023-07-05 at 9:07 PM UTC
-
2023-07-05 at 9:17 PM UTCWhat's ironic is you have an institute which calls itself the Climate Change Institute. Real science isn't based on predeterminations, forgone conclusions and pre-settled suppositions, but pseudoscience always is. They start right off with the conclusion, then manufacture the "facts" to suit the narrative. How could that be considered credible, in any sense of the word? Well, it can't.
-
2023-07-05 at 9:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ What's ironic is you have an institute which calls itself the Climate Change Institute. Real science isn't based on predeterminations, forgone conclusions and pre-settled suppositions, but pseudoscience always is. They start right off with the conclusion, then manufacture the "facts" to suit the narrative. How could that be considered credible, in any sense of the word? Well, it can't.
You're the only one relying on "manufactured facts" in this debate. Don't forget to wake me up once you find someone who cares what you think about all this. -
2023-07-05 at 9:46 PM UTC
-
2023-07-06 at 12:22 PM UTCGlobal ocean roiled by marine heatwaves, with more on the way
“No doubt, we’re in hot water,” said Dillon Amaya, a PSL research scientist and a co-lead of NOAA’s June 2023 marine heatwave experimental outlook. “In our 32-year record, we have never seen such widespread marine heatwave conditions.”
-
2023-07-06 at 1:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ What's ironic is you have an institute which calls itself the Climate Change Institute. Real science isn't based on predeterminations, forgone conclusions and pre-settled suppositions, but pseudoscience always is. They start right off with the conclusion, then manufacture the "facts" to suit the narrative. How could that be considered credible, in any sense of the word? Well, it can't.
yea, thats just like expecting an organizatin calling itself "Tobacco Safety Institute" to ever discover, and found the dangers of smoking.
-
2023-07-06 at 4:57 PM UTCYou guys seem really upset.
Maybe find someone who cares? -
2023-07-06 at 5:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Global ocean roiled by marine heatwaves, with more on the way
NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, entirely funded by the partisan hacks, chronic liars and frauds in the United States Department of Commerce. Such lovely "sources" you like to use a lot.
